Consumer Law Library

Benjamin Hallman, doing business as Reliable Suit Case Company

Volume 18 · 18 F.T.C. 126

Citation
18 F.T.C. 126
Docket
2109
Complaint
1933-07-26
Decision
1933-12-09
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
luggage manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist
Commission counsel
Alfred M. Craven
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Cite this decision

Benjamin Hallman, doing business as Reliable Suit Case Company, 18 F.T.C. 126 (1933). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v018-0019

Report an error in this record (decision id v018-0019)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATI'ER OF BENJAMIN HALLMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS RELIABLE SUIT CASE COMPANY COMPLAINT AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 2109. Oomplailnt, July 26, 1939-order, Dec. 9, 1939 Consent order requiring respondent, in connection with the sale and offer of luggage in interstate commerce, to cease and desist from labeling, stamping or otherwise advertising luggage manufactured in whole or in part from split leather, as being manufactured from genuine leather, and from in any manner indicutlng th:lt the material used in the manufacture is other than split leather.

Mr. Alfred M. Craven for the Commission.

Complaint Acting in the public interest pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes", the Federal Trade Commission charges that Benjamin Hallman has been and is using unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce in violation of the provisions of Section 5 of said act and states its charges in that respect as follows: P ARAGRAPII 1. Respondent, Benjamin Hallman, is now and has been for several years last past doing business in the city of New York under the trade name of Reliable Suit Case Co. The business of respondent is that of manufacturing and selling in interstate commerce to jobbers and retail dealers throughout the United States handbags, suitcases and other luggage. He causes said merchandise when sold to be shipped in interstate commerce from his said place of business in New York into and through various States of the United States to purchasers thereof at their respectiye points of location. In the course and conduct of his said business respondent is and has been in competition with many other persons, firms and corporations located in the United States engaged in the manufacture and sale in interstate commerce of handbags, suitcases and other luggage and in the shipment of same from their respective points of RELIABLE SUIT CASE CO, 127 126 Complaint location to purchasers throughout the various States of the United States.

PAR. 2. Many of respondent's competitors mentioned in paragraph 1 hereof make and sell luggage covered with leath-er made from the. outside or topside of sealskin or cowskin after same has been separated or split from the flesh side of the skin. Such leather is described by makers of luggage and generally known by manufacturers, tanners, dealers, and the purchasing public as " seal " or "genuine seal", "cowskin" or·" genuine cowskin ", as the case may be. The luggage covered by said skins is also known to the trade and usually branded or tagged by the manufacturer as " top grain cowhide" or" top grain seal", as the case may be. 'Vhen said competitors use as covering the leather manufactured from the flesh side of the skin, said leather as well as the luggage covered by it is ordinarily described, labeled and tagged by said manufacturers as "split seal " or "split cowhide", as the case may be. The split leather is very much inferior in quality, durability, and price to the top grain or genuine leather as described in this paragraph. PAR. 3. Respondent among other merchandise manufactures and sells in the course of business described in paragraph 1 hereof lnggage the covering of which is the material mentioned in paragraph 2 hereof as split leather, both seal and cowskin being used. This material is treated, embossed and finished by said respondent so as to imitate the genuine leather made from the top grain of cowskin and sealskin and in some cases the split cowskin leather is treated, embossed and finished so as to resemble genuine seal. Respondent by means of stamps, tags and other markings affixed to said luggage made of said split leather describes said luggage in the case of cowhide as "genuine cowhide leather " and in the case of seal as "genuine sealskin." Said descriptions made on or attached to said luggage reaches the public through the retail merchants and is used by said merchants in advertising and selling such spurious luggage to the public.

PAR. 4. Said descriptions, labels, and brandings made by respondent as to his merchandise are false and fraudulent in that the material described is not " genuine cowskin " or " genuine seal " as such descriptions are commonly understood by the purchasing public. The use of said descriptions, markings and representations has the capacity and tendency to deceive the purchasing public and induce purchasers to buy luggage thus described in and on account of the belief that the said luggage is made of genuine or top grain leather. Order 18F.T.C.

The said false brandings and markings also have the capacity and tendency unfairly to divert trade from respondent's competitors to the respondent.

PAR. 5. The above alleged acts and things done by respondent are all to the prejudice of the public and of respondent's competitors and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce within the intent and meaning of Section 5 of an act of Congress entitled "An act to create a Federal Trade Co.mmission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes", approved September 26, 1914. ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress approved Sep· t£>mber- 26, 1914, entitled "An act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes" (38 Stat. 719), the Federal Trade Commission, on the 26th day of July, 1933, issued and thereafter served its complaint against the respondent, Benjamin Hallman, doing business as Reliable Suit Case Co., charging him with the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act. Respondent thereafter filed an answer to said complaint, and thereafter, tendered to the Commission, for filing, a substituted answer, withdrawing the original answer, said substituted answer reading as follows: The respondent, Benjamin llallmann, doing business as Reliable Suit Case Co., having withdrawn his answer heretofore filed, for a substituted answer to the complaint of the Federal Trade Commission, states, that respondent refrains from contesting this proceeding and consents that the Commission may make, enter, and serve on the respondent an order to cease and desist from the violations of law alleged in the complaint. Thereafter, this proceeding came on regularly for disposition and decision by the Commission, under subdivision 2 of Rule III, of the Rules of Practice and Procedure adopted by the Commission; and the Commission being fully advised in the premises: It is ordered, That the substituted answer of the respondent be filed, and that the respondent, in connection with the sale and offer· ing for sale of luggage in interstate commerce between and among the several States of the United States and in the District of Columbia, do cease and desist from labeling, stamping or otherwise adver· tising luggage manufactured in whole or in part from split leather as being manufactured from genuine leather, and from in any manner indicating that the material used in the manufacture is other than split leather.

NATIONAL SILVER 00. 129 Complaint

← 18 F.T.C. 120 · 18 F.T.C. 129 →