White Cross Laboratories, Inc.
Volume 21 · 21 F.T.C. 265
deceptive advertisingproduct labeling
Cite this decision
White Cross Laboratories, Inc., 21 F.T.C. 265 (1935). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v021-0033
Report an error in this record (decision id v021-0033)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF WHITE CROSS LABORATORIES, INC.
COMPLAINT AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 15 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 2492. Complaint, July 6, 1935-order, Sept. 17, 1935 Consent order requiring respondent corporation, its officers, etc., in connection with the manufacture, sale and distribution of so-called "Turtle Oil Cream" in interstate commerce, the District of Columbia, or any territory of the United States, to cease and desist from- (a) Using words "turtle oil" either independently or in connection or conjunction with any word or words as part of the trade or brand name for its product unless and until the oil, fatty substance and any derivative thereof used in the production of the said turtle oil cream is, in fact, wholly derived from turtles; or (b) Using said words either independently or in connection or conjunction with any word, words, or phrases, in advertisements, advertising literature, radio broadcasts, or by any of these agencies in any manner whatsoever to describe turtle oil cream unless and untll the oil, fatty substance anc! any derivative thereof used in the production of the said turtle oil cream is, in fact, wholly derived from turtles.
Mr. S. Brogdyne Teu, II for the Commission. Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled ''An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes", the Federal Trade Commission having reason to believe that White Cross ~aboratories, Inc., hereinafter referred to as respondent, has been and lS using unfair methods of competition in commerce as "commerce" is defined in said act, and it appearing to said Commission that a pro- ~eeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby Issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. 'Vhite Cross Laboratories, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois with its principal place of business in the city of Chicago, in the State of Illinois. It is now and for more than one year last past has been engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution in interstate commerce of a cosmetic designated as La Paz 'turtle Oil Cream. Said respondent has caused and still causes said Product when sold to be shipped from its place of business in the State of Illinois to purchasers thereof located in a State or States of the linited States other than the State of Illinois. In the course and conduct of its business 'Vhite Cross Laboratories, Inc., was and is at all Complaint 21 F.T.C. times herein referred to in competition with other individuals, part· nerships, firms, and corporations likewise engaged in the manufac· ture, sale and distribution to purchasers of like and similar products between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.
PAR. 2. In the course and conduct of its business as described in paragraph 1 above, White Cross Laboratories, Inc., caused and still causes its said facial cream product to be packed in containers with labels reading as follows, to wit:
LA PAZ TURTLm OIL CREAM WHITE CROSS LAOORATOIUES, INC.
CHICAGO 'The said product so marked, labeled and represented was and is still -sold and distributed by said respondent in interstate commerce as :hereinabove set forth. In truth and in fact the amount of turtle oil forming part of the oil content of the product of said respondent was and is not substantial, was and is not sufficient to warrant a marking, branding or representation that said product was or is a "Turtle Oil" -cream.
PAR. 3. There are among competitors of said respondent individuals, partnerships and corporations engaged in the manufacture, sale and -distribution of like and similar products as hereinbefore set out -among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia who truthfully and honesty represent their products. The false and misleading representations made by respondent, as herein· -above set forth, have a tendency and capacity to and do divert trade to respondent from those individuals, firms, and corporations who honestly advertise, sell and distribute to purchasers like and similar products between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.
PAn. 4. The above alleged acts and things done by the respondent .are all to the injury and prejudice of the public and the competitors of the respondent in interstate commerce and constitute unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce within the intent and meaning of Section 5 of an Act of Congress entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, .and for other purposes", approved September 26, 1914. WHITE CROSS LABORATORIES, INC. 267 265 Order ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding coming on for final hearing by the Federal Trade Commission upon the record, including the complaint of the Commission issued under Section 5 of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes", and respondent's answer thereto that respondent waives hearing on the charges set forth in the complaint, refrains from contesting the proceeding and pursuant to the provisions of the Commission's Rules of . Practice with respect to answers, consents that the Commission may make, enter, and serve upon respondent without a trial, without evidence, and without findings as to the facts or other intervening procedure, an order to cease and desist from the method or methods of competition alleged in the complaint and the Commission having duly considered the matter and being fully advised in the premises- / t is now ordered, That ·white Cross Laboratories, Inc., its officers,. directors, agents, representatives, servants, and employees in connect~on with the manufacture, sale, and distribution of so-called "turtle: 011 cream" in interstate commerce or in the District of Columbia or in any territory of the United States, cease and desist from: (I) The use of the words "turtle oil" either independently or in connection or conjunction with any word or words as part of the trade or brand name for its product unless and until the oil, fatty substance and any derivative thereof used in the production of the said turtle oil cream is, in fact, wholly derived from turtles. (2) Using the words "turtle oil" either independently or in connection or conjunction with any word, words, or phrases, in advertiselllents, advertising literature, radio broadcasts, or by any of these agencies in any manner whatsoever to describe turtle oil cream unless and until the oil, fatty substance and any derivative thereof used in the production of the said turtle oil cream is, in fact, wholly derived from turtles.
It is further ordered, That the respondent White Cross Laboratories, Inc., shall within 60 days after service upon it of this order file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form of its compliance with this· order. Complaint 21F.T.C.