Consumer Law Library

Mccann Co., the John J

Volume 23 · 23 F.T.C. 724

Citation
23 F.T.C. 724
Docket
2926
Complaint
1936-09-22
Decision
1936-11-02
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
artificial limb appliances
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Order term (years)
2
Commission counsel
James M. II ammond
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingwarranty

Cite this decision

Mccann Co., the John J, 23 F.T.C. 724 (1936). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v023-0072

Report an error in this record (decision id v023-0072)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOHN J. McCANN COMPANY COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 2!J26. Complaint, Sept. 22, 1936-Decision, Nov. 2, 1936 "'WlH'J"e a corporation engaged In manufacture of artificial limb appliances, in· eluding stump socks, as to which there is a marked preference for articl(>S composed of wool, safe from attack by moths, and capable of great durabflity- •(a) Represented and advertised that Its "Comfort Stump Socks, used properly, should literally never wear out," facts being that while said products, used Interchangeably with a reasonable number of others, might remain service· able for a period of a year or longer, they were susceptible to ordinary wear and tear, and would not last Indefinitely, and would wear out; .(b) RE'presented and advertised, among other things, that "If any moth Is un· fortunate enough to come Into contact with a Comfort Stump Sock, he die!! before he can do any harm," and that said sock had been mothproofed, and that thereafter all such socks would be insured against moth damage for two years from date of purchase by a named insurance company, and that any socks thus damaged within said period would be replaced by said company free, and that such was its method of denying the charge that its said socks were not mothproofed; facts being they were not Impervious to such damage, and neither retailers nor members of purchasing and con· snming public were protected by insurance, as aforesaid, for two years, or any other period;

With capacity and tendency to deceive and mislead ultimate purchasers into buying such socks from It as and for articles which will last indefinitely and which have been so treated as to render same entirely impervious to moth damage, and which are further Insured against such damage, as above set forth, and to mislead and deceive retailers and consuming public so as to induce purchase of aforesaid product in preference to that of other manufacturers, or to pay a higher price therefor than would have been paid but for reliance upon aforesaid representations; and with effect of unfairly diverting trade from competitors engaged in sale of such socks, and who truthfully represent the wearing qualities of their products, their ability to withstand moth-damage, and extent to which purchasers are insured, if at all, against such damage; to the substantial injury of competition In commerce:

]Icld, That such acts and practices were to the prejudice of the public and competitors, and constituted unfair methods of competition. Mr. James M. II ammond for the Commission. Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress, approved Sep· tember 26, H>14, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Com· mission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes," the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that The .John THE JOHN J. McCANN CO. 725 Complaint .J. McCann Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the respondent, has been and is using unfair methods of competition in ·commerce, ns "commerce" is defined in said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges .in that respect, as follows :

PARAGRAPHl. The respondent, The John J. McCann Company, is a -corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State 'O:f New Jersey, having its office and principal place of business at 454 Lawrence Street, Burlington, N. J. It is now, and has been, for more than one year last past, engaged in the business of manufacturing, among other artificial limb appliances, an article known as "'Stump Socks", and of shipping said product, when sold, io the purchasers thereof, some located in the State of Ne,.,. Jersey, and others !ocated in various other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. There is now, and has been for more than one year last past, a constant current of trade and commerce by respondent in the aforesaid stump socks. In· the course and conduct of its business the respondent is now, and has been,.in substantial competition with '()ther corporations, and with partnerships and individuals likewise engaged in the sale of stump socks in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of ·Columbia.

PAn. 2. A stump sock is an article used by persons who have suffered the amputation of a limb, to cover the stump in order to ease the Pressure or friction caused by attaching an artificial appliance. ''these stump socks are generally made from a durable but soft material, and freedom from seams is a highly desirable feature. Since Wool is usually the principal article used in their manufacture, ~bility to withstand damage or destruction by moths is also a highly lmportant feature to both retail dealers who carry the same in stock nnd to the purchasing public. This marked preference on the part of ~onsumers for a soft, durable, seamless and moth-proof stump coverlug has been, and is, ad>ertised and exploited by the respondent herein. Respondent markets its stump socks under the name ''Comfort Stump Socks" which name is printed on the containers in which the said stump socks are sold, on tags affixed to the same, and on its letterheads, literature and other advertising matter. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its business as described in Paragraph 1 hereof, and for more than one year last past, the respondent herein, in soliciting the sale of and in selling its stump socks in commerce as herein set out, states in its correspondence, ad- 'V'ertisement~, or trrtde literature, or on its labels and tags, among other thing~, that:

726 FEDERAL TRADE COl\Il\USSION DECISIONS Complaint 23F. T.C.

One of the most important features of the Comfort Stump Sock is the "finish", which refers particularly to the shaping of the bottom. Until this new finish was developed and patented for exclusive use in Comfort Stump Socks, it was difficult to provide a bottom that was both strong and smooth. The new finish, being seamless is just RS smooth as the previous finish of Comfort Stump Socks and by actual tests it doubles the strength just where the greatest strain comes.

Comfort Stump Socks, used properly, should literally never wear out. Said statements serve as representations on the part of respondent to a substantial portion of the purchasing public, that the respondent's stump socks are, in fact, seamless, and will withr.land ordinary wear and tear indefinitely.

In truth and in fact, respondent's stump socks are not seamless and do have seams in the enclosed end or bottom thereof. Said stump socks will not v•ear indefinitely, but have an average life, under ordinary circumstances, of approximately one year. PAn. 4. In the course and conduct of its business, as described in paragraph 1 hereof, and for more than one year last past, the respondent herein, in soliciting the sale of and in selling its stump socks in commerce, as herein set out, states in its correspondence, advertisements or trade literature, or on its labels and tags, among other things tpa t :

Now, if any moth is unfortunate enough to come Into contact with a Comfort Stump Sock, he dies before he can do any harm. This Comfort Stump Sock has been moth proofed. Hereafter, All Wool Comfort Stump Socks will be in~ured against dn.mage by moths for a period of two years from the date of purchase, by the American Eagle Insurance Co.

Any All Wool Comfort Stump Socks damaged by moth within two years from the date of sale will be replaced by the American Eagle Insurance Co., free of charge.

This is our method of denying the charge that All Wool Comfort StmnP SociH! are not moth-proof.

Said statements serve as representations on the part of respondent to a substantial portion of the purchasing public, that the respondent's stump socks are, in fact, moth-proof, and that moths do die when they come in contact therewith before they can do any harru, and that the said stump socks are insured for a period of two years after purchase by a reliable insurance company. In truth and in fact, respondent's stump socks are not moth-proof and are, in fact, susceptible of consumption or damage, in whole or in part, by moths, and retail dealers and other purchasers of respondent's said stump socks are not protected from damage from moths by insurance issued by the American Eagle Insurance Company, the American Eagle Fire Insurance Company, or any other insurancecompany, or companies, and such moth insurance, if any, only covers THE JOHN J. J.IIcCANN CO. 727 724 Complaint said stump socks while they remain in the possession of the respondent company.

PAR. 5. There are among the competitors of respondent, as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, other corporations, firms, partnerships, and individuals who do sell stump socks in interstate commerce, who do not misrepresent their product to be "seamless", or to "literally never wear out", or that the same have been "moth-proofed" or that the purchasers thereof are insured against damage by moths for two Years, or any other time, and who do not in any manner misrepresent the character or quality of their product. • PAR. 6. The acts and practices of respondent in falsely represent- ~ng, advertising, marking, and branding its products or falsely marktng, branding or representing in its circulars or advertising that the enclosed ends or feet of its stump socks are "seamless"; that they "should literally never wear out"; that they have been "moth- Proofed"; or that a moth "will die after coming in contact therewith before he can do any harm"; or that the purchasing public or the retail trade is insured against damage by moths for a period of two Years, or any other period, are all, or any of such or similar representations, calculated to mislead and deceive, and have, and have had, the capacity, tendency and effect of misleading and deceiving, and have misled and deceived, a substantial portion of the purchasing and consuming public into the e~Toneous belief that all of said repre- ~entations are true and into the purchase of respondent's stump S"cks 111 reliance on said representations. Respondent has also placed in the hands of wholesalers, jobbers, and retailers, the means of making false and misleading representations as above described to the purchasing p~blic, by which means, or any of them, it has increased its own sales of said stump socks, so dishonestly advertised or represented, t.hereby lessening the market for similar goods sold by other manufacturers, merchants, or dealers, the true nature of which is honestly stated.

As a result thereof, trade is unfairly diverted to the respondent from competitors engaged in the sale in interstate commerce of similar stump socks who truthfully represent their respective products. Further, as a result thereof, substantial injury has been and is being done by respondent to the purchasing public and to competition in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and the District of Columbia .

• PAR. 7. The above and foregoing acts, practices, and representations of the respondent have been and are all to the prejudice of the Public and respondent's competitors, as aforesaid, and have been, ~nd are, unfair methods of compe:tition within the meaning and lntent of Section 5 of an Act of Congress entitled "An Act to create 728 FEDERAL TRADE COl\IMISSION DECISIONS Findings 23 F .. T. Or a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes."

REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND Onder Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes," the- Federal Trade Commission, on September 22, 1936 issued, and on September 23, 1936 served, its complaint in this proceeding upon the respondent, The John J. McCann Company, charging it with the .useof unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the· provisions of said act. After the issuance of said complaint aml the filing of respondent's answer, the Commission, by order entered herein, granted respondent's motion for permission to withdraw said answer and to substitute therefor an answer admitting all of thematerial allegations of the complaint to be true, with the exception of the allegation contained in said complaint to the effect that respondent's stump socks are not seamless, and waiving the taking of further evidence, and all other intervening procedure, in reference to the allegations so admitted to be true, which substituted answer was duly filed in the office of the Commission. Thereafter, this proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the said complaint and the substituted nnswer, briefs and oral arguments of counsel having been waived, and the Commission having duly considered the same and being now fully ad vised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in theinterest of the public and makes this its findings ns to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom: • FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. The respondent, The John J. McCann Company, ig a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New Jersey, having its office and principal place of business at 454 Lawrence St., Burlington, N. J. It is now, and has been, for more than one year last past, engaged in the business of manufacturing, among other artificial limb appliances, an article knmvn as "stump socks", and of shipping said product, when sold, to the purchasers thereof, some located in the State of New Jersey, and others located in various other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. There is now, .and has been for more than one year last past, a constant current of trade and commerce by respondent in the aforesaid stump socks. In the course and con· duct of its business the respondent is now, and has been, in substantial competition with other corporations, and with partnerships and THE JOHN J. McCANN CO. 7:l9 724 Findings individuals likewise engaged in the sale of stump socks in commerce between and among the various States of the United States and in. the District of Columbia.

PAn. 2. A stump sock is an article used by persons who have suffered the amputation of a limb to cover the stump, in order to ease the pressure or friction caused by attaching an artificial appliance .. These stump socks are made from soft material and are generally composed of wool. Because of this fact, the ability of the articleto withstand damage or destruction by moths is a highly important feature to both retail dealers, who carry the same in stock, and tothe purchasing public. This marked preference on the part of consumers for a stump sock composed of a woolen fabric safe from attack by moths and capable of great durability has been, and is, advertised and exploited by the respondent herein. The respondent l11n.rkets its stump socks under the name "Comfort Stump Socks',.,. Which name is printed on the containers in which the said stump socks are sold, on tags affixed to the same, and on its letterheads,. literature, and other advertising matter.

PAn. 3. In soliciting the sale of and in selling its stump socks in commerce as herein set out, respondent states in its correspondence,. advertisements, or trade literature, or on its labels and tags, among other things, that said stump socks are seamless. Respondent's. :oturnp socks are, in fact, seamless.

. PAn. 4. !Q. soliciting the sale o·f and in selling its said stnmp ~o~.:ks In commerce, the respondent has also advertised and represe11t~dr lllnong other things, ~hat:

Comfort Stump Socks, tised properly, should literally never wear out. Respondent's stump socks are susceptible to ordinary wear and tear, will not last indefinitely, and will wear out; but when used inter<.:hangeably with a reasonable number of other stump socks may remain serviceable for a period of one year or longer . . PAR. 5. In soliciting the sale of and in selling its said stump socks In commerce, respondent has also advertised and represented, among other things, that:

Now, if any moth Is unfortunate enough to come Into contact with a Comfort Stump Sock, be dies before be can do nny harm. 'I'his Comfort Stump Soc!' bas been mothproofed. Hereafter, All Wool Comfort Stump Socks will be insured against damage hy moths !or n pet·fod ot' two years t't·om the date of purchase, by the American lDagle Insurance Company.

Any All Wool Comfort Stump Socks damaged by moth within two years from the date ot' sale will be replaced by the American Engle Insurance Co., tree of ~'charge, S This is not our method of denying the charge that All Wood Coufort Stump OCks ore not mothproofed.

Conclusion 23F.T.C· The use by the respondent of these representations has a tendency and capacity to, and does create the impression and belief among the purchasing public that moths will not attack respondent's stump socks and that they are impervious to damage in that manner and that, should any stump sock purchased by a retailer or by a member of the public become in any way damaged by moths within two years after purchase, that the same will be replaced free of charge by the American Eagle Insurance Company or some other insurance company.

Respondent's said stump socks are not impervious to damage by moths and neither retail merchants nor members of the purchasing and consuming public are protected by insurance issued by the American Eagle Insurance Company, or any other insurance company, against damage by moths for two years after purchase, or for any other period of time.

PAR. 6. The use by respondent of the aforesaid representations, as herein related, are false and misleading and have the capacity and tendency to deceive and may deceive and mislead ultimate purchasers into buying stump socks from respondent in the belief that they are purchasing an article which will not wear out and which will last indefinitely, and which has been treated in such a manner as to render the same entirely impervious to damage by moths, and that the said stump socks so purchased are insured against damage by moths by the American Eagle Insurance Company, or other insur· ance' company, free of charge, for a period of two years following purchase of the same. These representations mislead and deceive or may mislead and deceive retail merchants and the consuming publio so as to induce them to purchase respondent's product in preference to the products of other manufacturers of stump socks or to pay a l1higher or greater price therefor than would have been paid had not the purchase been made in reliance upon these representations. PAR. 7. The use by respondent of the aforesaid practices has the tendency and capacity to, and does, unfairly divert trade from corn· petitors engaged in selling stump socks in commerce between and among the various States of the United States who truthfully repre· sent the wearing qualities of their products, their ability to withstand damage from moths, and the extent to which purchasers are insured, H at all, against damage by moths, and thereby respondent does -substantial injury to competition in interstate commerce. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent, The John J. McCann Company, except as to the matter set out in paragraph 3 above, are to the prejudice of the public and of respondent's com- THE JOHN J. McCANN CO. 731 724 Order Petitors, and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce, within the intent and meaning of Section 5 of an Act of Congress, approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes."

ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answer filed herein on October 26, 1936, by respondent, admitting all the material allegations of the complaint to be true with the exception of theallegation contained in said complaint to the effect that responde11t's. stump socks are not seamless, and waiving the taking of further evidence and all other intervening procedure as to said admitted allegations, and the Commission having made its findings as to thefacts and its conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes." It i8 ordered, That the respondent, The John J. McCann Com- Pany, its officers, representatives, agents, and employees, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of its stump socks in interstate commerce or in the District of Columbia, do forth- With cease and desist from representing, directly or by implication: 1. Through the use of the phrase "literally never \Year out", or any other word or words of similar import or effect that the life of said stump socks is indefinite and that they are impervious to ordinary wear and tear;

. 2. That said stump socks are mothproof or that a moth, coming lll contact with the same will die before it can do any harm; or that the said stump socks are impervious to damage by moths; 3. That purchasers of the saiu stump socks are insured against ~damage by moths for a period of two years or for any other period of hme from the date of purchase, by the American Eagle. Insurance Com- Pany, or any other insurance corr{pany, unless and until retail dealers and purchasers or consumers of said stump socks are so insured. It i8 further ordered, That the complaint in this proceeding be, and the same is hereby dismissed insofar as the same relates to an allegation contained therein to the effect that re.spondent's stump ~cks are not seamless.

It is further ordered, That the respondent shall, within GO days from the date of the service upon it of this order, file 'rith this ~011lmission, its report in writing, stating the manner aji(l form In which it shall have complied with this order. 732 FEDERAL TRADI<~ COMMISSION DECISIONS Syllabus 23F. T.C.

← 23 F.T.C. 714 · 23 F.T.C. 732 →