Consumer Law Library

Stone, J. R

Volume 23 · 23 F.T.C. 744

Citation
23 F.T.C. 744
Docket
2866
Complaint
1936-07-03
Decision
1936-11-03
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
jewelry
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Mr.. George Foulkes
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Stone, J. R, 23 F.T.C. 744 (1936). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v023-0074

Report an error in this record (decision id v023-0074)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF .J. R. 'STONE TRADING AS SPANISH DIAMOND CO., CHINESE RING CO., AND NATIONAL JEWELRY CO. COMP.LAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 15 OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Boc"ket '!866. Complaint, July 3, 1936-Decision, Nov. 3, 1936 Where ·an individual, engaged in the sale of imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, ;and variously doing business as Spanish Diamond Co., Chinese Ring Co., and National Jewelry Co.; in advertising said products in newspapers ana Jleriodicals, and in booklets, testimonials, and other advertising literature-- (a) Referred to -said imitation and simulated diamonds as "gems" "which look like diamonds worth $150.00" and other substantial amounts, and cannot be told from the genuine costing many hundreds of dollars," and ;as·'~Spanish" or "Spanish Imitation," and as possessing "fire" and "fiawles:J.'' :ana ·as "scientific reproductions of the genuine, which will wear a life- 'time," and as "Spanish Imported," or "Laboratory Made;" the facts being ·said diamonds were made or glass and other cheap compositions, did not ·baffie or deceive experts or have any such appearance, no such thing is lmown to the jewelry trade as a "Spanish" or "Spanish Imitation" din• 'lllond, they were not Imported from Spain or "Luboratory Made," and :said varlow~ representations were false;

(b) Represented that his said ring mountings had a "Platinum Efrect Finish" or were "White Gold-Appearing," or "Sterling," or "Chromium" reproduc· tions of a $300.00 diamond ring, and were finished In 18 Kt. white gold; the facts being said mountings were not finished with a material simulating platinum, and did not have any such appearance as above set forth; With tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public Into the erroneous belief that all said representations were true, and with the result that a number of the consuming publlc pur· -chnsed a substantial volume of his said imitation and simulated diamonds :and 'rings, and trade wus unfairly dh·erted to him from those engaged in ·sale of diamonds and rings and who truthfully advertise their products; to the substantial Injury of competition In rommerce: Held, That surh acts and practices were to the prejudice of the public and competitors, and constituted unfair methods of competition. :nefore Jfr. Roberts. Hall, trial examiner. Mr.. George Foulkes for the Commission.

Complaint "Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved Sep· tember 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Com· mission, :to ,defin~ its powers and duties, and for other purposes," the SPANISH DIAMOND CO., ETC. 745 744 Complaint Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that J. R. Stone, an individual, trading as Spanish Diamond Co., Chinese Ring Co., and National Jewelry Co., hereinafter referred to as respondent, has been and now is using unfair methods of competition in commerce as "commerce" is defined in said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, J. R. Stone, is an individual with his principal office and place of business located in the city of Wheeling, State of 'Vest Virginia. Respondent is now, and for more than five years last past has been, engaged in the business of selling imitation and simulated diamonds and rings which respondent distributes to purchasers, many of whom reside in States other than the State of West Virginia. When orders are received therefor they are filled by respondent by shipping said imitation and simulated diamonds and rings from the said city of Wheeling, West Virginia, into and through other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia, and there is now, and has been during the time hereinbefore mentioned, a constant current of trade and commerce in said imitation and simulated diamonds and rings so distributed and sold by respondent between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

In the course and conduct of his said business, said respondent was~ and is, in substantial competition with other individuals, firms, partnerships, and corporations likewise engaged in the sale and distribution of diamonds and rings between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. PAR. 2. In the course of the operation of said business, and for the purpose of inducing individuals to purchase said imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, respondent has caused advertisements to be inserted in newspapers and magazines of general circulation throughout the United States. The advertising placed by respondent in newspapers, magazines, and periodicals is variously devised to show representations of diamond rings, and contains statements and representations, such as the following:

LOOKS $250 FOR $1.48 Beautiful Spanish Imitation Diamond Bames Experts. White-Gold-Appearing Sterling. Ladies' or Gents', in Gift Box. SEND NO 1\IONEY. Pay Postman $1.48 plus postage. Money back if not delighted! State Size. Order Now I Address: SPANISH DIAMOND CO., Dept. H, Wlu•~ltn~, W. Va. 746 FEDEr..AL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 23F. T.C.

Beautiful Life-Time White-Gold-Appearing Chromium Reproduction of a ~300 Diamond Ring. Duffles Experts. Ladies' or Gents' in Which Gift Ilox. SEND NO 1\IONEY. lay Postman l)l)~ plus postage (or, reruit $1 with order and we will pay postage). 1\foney back if not uelighted! Ordrr at Once! SPANISH DIAl\IOND CO., Dept. 16, Wheeltng, West Ya.

FREE RING OFFER 1'o introduce our blue-white rainbow flash Gems, we will send free a 1 Kt. Spani~h Imitation Diamond Ring (looks like $1;)0 stone), for this ad and 15¢ to help pay ad\"', :md bundling expense. National Jewelry Co., Dept. 25-D, WllePling, West Ya. (2 for 23¢) All of said statements, together with many similar statements appearing in respondent's advertising literature, purport to be descriptive of respondent's product. In all of his advertising literature, respondent represents~ through statements and representations herein set out, and other statements of similar import and effect, that the sets or stones in said rings (1) are gems, (2) baffie and deceive experts, (3) look like diamonds worth $250 or $300 or $150, (4) cannot be told from genuine diamonds costing many hundreds of dollars, ( 5) are "Spanish Diamonds" or "Spanish Imitation Diamonds", (6) do not lose their fire, (7) are flawless, (8) are scientific reproductions of genuine diamonds, (9) will wear a lifetime, ( 10) are Spanish imported gems, and (11) are "Laboratory l\Iade". Further, in his advertising literature, respondent represents, through statements and representations herein set out, and other statements of similar import and effect, that the ring mountings (1) have a "Platinum Effect Finish", (2) are "White Gold-Appearing ~terling", (3) are White Gold Appearing Chromium reproductions of a $300 diamond ring, and ( 4) are finished in 18 Kt. White Gold. PAR. 3. The representations made by respondent with respect to his product are grossly exaggerated, false, misleading, and untrue. In truth and in fact the sets or stones sold by respondent as afore· said, are not gems but are made of glass and other cheap compositions, and said sets or stones do not baffie and deceive experts, nor have they the appearance of diamonds worth $250 or $300 or $150, or of any other substantial amount. Said sets or stones can be easily distinguished from genuine diamonds costing many hundreds of dollars. Respondent's products are not "Spanish Diamonds" nor are they "Spanish Imitation Diamonds" in that no such thing as a Spanish or a Spanish Imitation diamond has any existence or is known by the jewelry trade. Respondent's imitation and simulated diamonds are not flawless, and being composed chiefly of glnss do not possess nny "fire" as the term is used in the jewelry trade. Said SPANISH DIAMOND CO., ETC. 747 744 Findings sets or diamonds are not scientific reproductions of genuine diamonds, nor will they wear a lifetime, but are, as aforesaid, an ordinary glass product. Said products are not imported from Spain nor are they "laboratory made".

The representations made by respondent in connection with the sale of the ring mountings are also false, misleading, and untrue. Said ring mountings are not finished with a material simulating platinum, nor do they have the appearance of white gold or 18 kt. white gold. Said rings do not have the appearance of diamond rings worth $300 or any other substantial amount. PAR. 4. Each and all of the false and misleading statements and representations made by respondent ]n designating and describing the imitation and simulated diamonds, as hereinaboye set forth, in his advertising in newspapers, magazines, booklets, pamphlets, testimonials, and other ad vert ising literature, in offering for sale, and selling, his imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, have had, and now has, a tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous belief that all of said representations are true. Further, as a direct consequence of the mistaken and erroneous belief induced by the advertisements and misrepresentations of respondent, as hereinabove detailed, a number of the consuming public purchased a substantial ~·volume of respondent's imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, With the result that trade has b"een unfairly diverted to respondent from individuals, firms, partnerships, and corporations likewise engaged in the business of selling diamonds and rings, and who truthfully advertise their products. As a result thereof, substantial injury has been, and is now being done, by respondent to competition in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 5. The above alleged acts and practices of respondent are each and all of them to the prejudice of the public and respondent's com- . Petitors, and constitute unfair methods of competition in commercl'l Within the meaning of Section 5 of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Comlhission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes." REPORT, FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes," the Federal Trade Commission, on July 3, ll.l36, issued and served its complaint in this proceeding upon respondent J. R. Stone, an indi- Findings 23F. '.r. C. vidual trading as Spanish Diamond Co., Chinese Ring Co., and National Jewelry Co., charging him with tlle use of unfair methods of competition in commerce in violation of the provisions of said act. After the issuance of said complaint and the filing of respondenes answer thereto, testimony and other evidence in support of the allegations of said complaint were introduced by George Foulkesr attorney for the Commission, before Robert S. Hall, an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, and in defense of the allegations of the complaint by respondent; and said testimony and other evidence was duly recorded and filed in the office of the Commission. Thereafter, the proceeding re.gularly came on for final hearing before the Commission on the said complaint, the answer thereto, testimony and evidence, the right of counsel of the Commission and the respondent to file briefs and the presentation of arguments being expressly waived, and the Commission having duly considered the same, and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public, and makes this its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom: FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. J. R. Stone, respondent herein, is an individual with his principal office and place of business located in the city of Wheeling, State of 'Vest Virginia. Respondent is: now, and :for more than five years last past has been, engaged in the business of selling imitation and simulated diamonds and rings which respondent distributes to purchasers, many of whom reside in States other than the State of West Virginia.

'Vhen respondent receives orders :for said imitation and simulated diamonds and rings he fills same by shipping said diamonds and rings from the said city of Wheeling, West Virginia, into and through other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia, and there is now, and has been during the time herein-· before mentioned, a constant current of trade and commerce in said imitation and simulated diamonds and rings so distributed and sold by respondent between and among the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

In the course and conduct of his said business, said respondent was1 and is, in substantial competition with other individuals, firms, and partnerships, and corporations likewise engaged in the sale and distribution of diamonds and rings between and among the various: States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. PAR. 2. The respondent in the operation of his said business, and for the purpose of inducing individuals to purchase said imitation SPANISH DIAMOND CO., ETC. 7491 744 Findings and simulated diamonds and rings, has caused advertisements· to be· inserted in newspapers and magazines of general circulation throughout the United States.

The advertising placed by respondent in newspapers, magazines,, and periodicals is variously devised to show representations such as; the following :

LOOKS $250 FOR $1.48 BEAUTIFUL SPANISH Imitation Diamond Baffies Experts. White-Gold-Appearing Sterling. Ladies' or- Gents' in Gift Box. SEND NO MONEY. Pay Postman $1.48 plt!S' postage. l\Ioney bFick If not Delighted! State Size. Order Now!: Address: SPANISH DIAMOND CO., Dept. 14, Wheeling, W. Va .• Beautiful 'Life-Time White-Gold-Appearing Chromium Reproduction of a $300 Diamond Ring. Baffles Experts. Ladies' or Gents' in. Rich Gift Box. SEND NO MONEY. Pay Postman 99¢ plus postage (or, remit $1 with order and we will pay postage). Monet back if not Delighted! Order at Once! SPANISH DIAl\IONJ), CO., Dept. 16, Wheeling, West Va.

FREE RING OFFER To introduce our blue-white rainbow flash Gems, we will send free a 1 kt. Spanish Imitation Diamond Ring (looks like $150 stone), for this ad and 15¢ to help pay adv. and handling expense. National Jewelry Co., Dept. 25-D, Wheeling, West Va. (2 for 25¢) The above statements, together with many similar statements appearing in respondent's advertising literature, purport to be descriptive of respondent's product.

In all of his advertising literature, respondent represents, through statements and representations herein set out, and other statements. of similar import and effect, that the sets or stones in said rings (1). are gems, (2) baffle and deceive experts, (3) look like diamonds worth $250 or $300 or $150, ( 4) cannot be told from genuine diamonds costing many hundreds of dollars, ( 5) are "Spanish Diamonds" or "Spanish Imitation Diamonds", (6) do not lose their fire, (7) are flawless,. (8) are scientific reproductions of genuine diamonds, (9) will weara lifetime, {10) are Spanish imported gems, and (11) are "Laboratory Made".

Further, in his advertising literature, respondent represents, through statements and representations herein set out, and other starements of similar import and effect, that the ring mountings {1) have· a "Platinum Effect Finish", (2) are "White Gold-Appearing Ster-ling", (3) are "White Gold-Appearing Chromium" reproductions of' a $300 diamond ring, and ( 4) are finished in "18 Kt. 'White Gold":. 750 FEDERAL TRADE COl\IMISSION DECISIONS Il'indings 23F. T.C. PAR. 3. The representations made by respondent with respect to his product are grossly exaggerated, false, misleading1 and untrue. In fact the sets or stones sold by respondent, as aforesaid, are not gems but are made of glass and other cheap compositions, and said sets or stones do not baffle and deceive experts, nor have they the appearance of diamonds worth $250 or $300 or $150, or of any other substantial amount.

Respondent's sets or stones can be easily distinguished from gen· uine diamonds costing hundreds of dollars. Respondent's products are not "Spanish Diamonds" nor are they "Spanish Imitation Diamonds" in that no such thing as a Spanish or a Spanish Imitation Diamond has any existance or is known by the jewelry trade.

Respondent's imitation and simulated diamonds are not flawless, and being composed chiefly of glass do not possess any "fire" as the term is used in the jewelry trade.

Respondent's sets or diamonds are not scientific reproductions of genuine diamonds, nor will they wear a lifetime, but are, as aforesaid, an ordinary glass product.

Said sets or diamonds are not imported from Spain and are not "laboratory made".

The representations made by respondent in connection with the sale of the ring mountings are also false, misleading, and untrue. Said ring mountings are not finished ",·ith a material simulating platinum, and do not have the appearance of white gold or 18 Kt. white gold. Said rings do not have the appearance of diamond rings worth $300 or any other substantial amount.

PAR. 4. Each and all of the false and misleading statements and representations made by respondent in designating and describing the imitation and simulated diamonds, as hereinabove set forth, in his advertising in newspapers, magazines, booklets, pamphlets, testimonials, and other ad vert ising literature, in offering for sale, and selling, his imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, have had, and now has, a tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive a substantial portion of the purchasing public into the erroneous belief that all of said representations are true.

Further, as a direct consequence of the mistaken and erroneous belief induced by the advertisements and misrepresentations of respondent, as hereinabove detailed, a number of the consuming public purchased a substantial volume of respondent's imitation and simulated diamonds and rings, with the result that trade has been unfairly diverted to respondent from individuals, firms, partnerships, and corporations likewise engaged in the business of selling diamonds SPANISH DIAMOND CO., ETC. 751 744 Order and rings, and who truthfully advertise their products. As a result thereof, substantial injury has been, and is now being clone, Ly respondent to competition in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent, J. R Stone, an individual, trading as Spanish Diamond Co., Chinese Ring Co., and National Je\velry Co., are to the prejudice of the public aml of respondent's competitors, and constitute unfttir methods of competition in commerce, within the. intent and meaning of Section 5 of an Act of Congress, approved September 26, 1914, entitled "An Act to create a Federal Trade Commission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes."

ORDER 'TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answer of respondent, testimony and other eviuence taken before Hobert S. Hall, an examiner of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, in support of the allegations of saiu complaint and in opposition thereto, the filing of briefs and oral arguments having been expressly waived by counsel for the Commission and by respondent, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that Raid. respondent has violated the provisions of an Act of Congress approyeJ September 26, 1914, entitleu "An Act to create a Federal Trade Com- :rnission, to define its powers and duties, and for other purposes." It is ordered, That the respondent, J. R. Stone, an individual trading as Spanish Diamond Co., Chinese Ring Co., and National Jewelry Co., his officers, representatives, agents and employees, in connection with the offering for sale, sale anti distribution of imitation and simulated diamonds and rings in interstate commerce or in the District of Columbia, do forthwith cease and desist from representing:

(1) That his imitation simulated diamonds and rings are (a) ge!...'1S, (b) baffle and deceive experts, (c) look like diamonds worth $150, $25() or $300, or any other substantial amount of money, (d) cannot be llld from genuine diamonds costing many hundreds of dollars, (e) are "Spanish Diamonds," or "Spanish Imitation Diamonds," (f) possess what is known in the jewelry trade as "fire," (g) are flawless~ (h) are sdentific reproductions of genuine diamonds, (i) will wea.r ·.752 :FEDERAL TRADE COl\IMISSION DECISIONS Order 23F. T. C.

a lifetime, l{'j) are Spanish imported gems, (k) are "Laborato:1ry Made."

'{2) That his ring mountings {a) have a "Platinum Effect Finish/' {b) are "1Vhite .Gold-Appearing Sterling," (c) are "White Gold-Appearing Chromium" reproductions of a $300 diamond ring, or reproductions of a diamond ring worth any substantial amount of money, (e) are finished in 18-carat white gold.

It is further 'Ordered, That the respondent shall, within 30 days .after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

CHARLES OF THE RITZ DISTRIBUTORS CORP. 753 Syllabus

← 23 F.T.C. 732 · 23 F.T.C. 753 →