Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Blackhurst, J. Herbert -

Volume 32 · 32 F.T.C. 574

Citation
32 F.T.C. 574
Docket
4375
Complaint
1940-11-13
Decision
1941-01-29
Document type
final order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
books and printed matter
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
L. E. Creel, Jr; ent herein and ,V. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel
Respondent counsel
Scott Rowley, of Des Moines, Iowa
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Cite this decision

Blackhurst, J. Herbert -, 32 F.T.C. 574 (1941). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v032-0064

Report an error in this record (decision id v032-0064)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MA'ITER OF J. HERBERT BLACKHURST, DOING BUSINESS AS UNIVERSITY PRESS COMPLAINT, FINDINGS, AND ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF AN ACT 011' CONGRESS APPROVED SEPT. 26, 1914 Docket 4375. Complaint, Nov. 1!1, 1940-De&ision, Jan. 1!9, 1941 Where an individual engaged, under trade name "University Press," in sale of books and other printed matter used in classroom instruction, to pur· chasers in various other States and in the District of Golumbia- Represented, directly or by inference, through use of words "University Press" in trade name under which he conducted his business and which he fea· tured on printed matter above referred to, and on stationery and other advertising matter disseminated among prospective customers in various States and in said District, that his business was owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other Institution of higher learning, facts being it was not thus owned, controlled, or supervised ; With tendency and capacity, through use of word "University" by said indi· vidual as part' of his trade name, to mislead and deceive members of purchasing public situated in the various States and in said District into mistaken and erroneous belief that his business was owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other institution of higher learning, and to cause them, as result of such erroneous belief, engendered as above set forth, to purchase his said products :

Held, That such acts and practices, under the circumstances set forth, were all to the pt•ejudice and injury of the public, and constituted unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce. Mr. L. E. Creel, Jr., for the Commission. Mr. Scott Rowley, of Des Moines, Iowa, for respondent. Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that J. Herbert Blackhurst, an individual, trading and doing business under the name University Press, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provi~ions of said act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the publio interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows :

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, J. Herbert Blackhurst, is an individual trading and doing business under the name University Press. His UNIVERSITY PRESS 575 574 Complaint principal office and place of business are at Des Moines, Iowa. Respondent is now, and for more than 1 year last past has been, engaged in the sale of books and other printed matter used ill classroom instruction.

In the course and conduct of his business, respondent causes said printed matter, when sold, to be transported from his place of business in the State of Iowa to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a course of trade in said printed matter in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

PAR. 2. In the course of the operation of his business as aforesaid, respondent has used the words "University Press" as and for the trade name under which he has conducted his business. He has featured this trade name on said printed matter, and on stationery and other advertising matter which have been disseminated among prospective customers located in various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia.

By means of the use of the word "University" in his said trade name, the respondent represents that his business is owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other institution of learning. By means of the use of the word "Press" in his said trade name, respondent represents that he owns, operates, or controls a printing establishment wherein the printed matter he sells is printed. PAR. 3. In truth and in fact, the respondent's business is not owned, controlled, or supervised by any university or institution of learning. Respondent does not own, operate, or control a printing press or printing establishment.' The printed matter which he offers for sale is printed for him under contract by a printing establishment which he does not own, operate, or control. PAR. 4. The use by respondent of the aforesaid false, misleading, and deceptive trade name has the tendency and capacity to, and does, mislead and deceive members of the purchasing public situated in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia into the mistakt:>n and erroneous belief that his trade name truthfully describes his business.

PAR. 5. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practict:>s in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Findings 32F.T.C.

REPORT' FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS, AND ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Trade Commission, on the 13th day of November 1940, issued and subsequently served its complaint in this proceeding upon said respondent, J. Herbert Blackhurst, an individual trading and ~doing business under the name University l)ress, charging him with the use of unfair and decept~ve acts and practices in commerce in "1violation of the provisions of said act. On December 3, 1940, the respondent filed his answer in this proceeding. Thereafter a stipulation was entered into whereby it was stipulated and agreed that a statement of facts signed and executed by the respondent, J. Herbert Blackhurst, and 1V. T. Kelley, chief counsel for the Federal Trade Commission, subject to the approval of the Commission, may be taken 11s the. facts in this proceeding and in lieu of testimony in support of the charges stated in the complaint, or in opposition thereto, and that the said Commission may proceed upon said statement of facts to make its report, stating its findings as to the facts and its conclusion based thereon and enter its order disposing of the proceeding without the presentation of argument or the filing of briefs. Thereafter, this proceeding regularly came on for final hearing before the. Commi.ssion on said complaint, answer, and stipulation; said stipulation having been approved, accepted, and filed, and the Commission having duly considered the same and being now fully advised in the premises, finds that this proceeding is in the interest of the public and makes its findings as to the facts and its conclusion drawn therefrom.

FINDINGS AS TO THE FACTS PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, J. Herbert Blackhurst, is an individual, formerly trading and doing business under the name University Press. His principal office and place of business are located in the city of Des Moines, State of Iowa. Respondent is now and has been since October 31, 1940, operating by means of a corporation designated Blackhurst Book Sales, Inc., an Iowa corporation. Respondent is now and for more than 1 year last past has been engaged in the sale of books and other printed matter used in classroom instruction. In the course and conduct of his business respondent has caused said books and printed matter when sold to be transported from his place of business in the State of Iowa to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent at all times mentioned herein has maintained a course of trade in said printed matter in commerce among UNIVERSITY PRESS 577 574 Order and between the vanous States of the United States and in the District o£ Columbia.

PAR. 2. In the course of the operation of his business as aforesaid, respondent has used the words "University Press,' as and for the trade name under which he has conducted his business. He has featured this trade name on said printed matter and on stationery and other advertising matter which has been disseminated among prospective customers located in various States o£ the United States and in the District of Columbia. The trade name University Press was used by respondent up to and including October 31, 1940, but was discontinued on that date.

By means of the use of the word "University" in his said trade name· the respondent represented directly or by inference that his business. was owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other insti~ tution of higher learning.

PAR. 3. In truth and in fact, the respondent's business was not owned, controlled, or supervised by any university or institution of learning.

PAR. 4. The use by respondent of the word "University" as part of his trade name had the tendency and capacity to mislead and deceive members of the purchasing public situated in the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia into th~ mistaken and erroneous belief that respondent's business was owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other institution of higher learning, and to cause them to purchase respondent's products as a result of such erroneous belief engendered as above set forth. CONCLUSION The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent as herein found are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and prn.ctices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act. ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Conllllission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answer of the respondent, and a stipulation as to the facts entered into between the respondent herein and ,V. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel for the Commission, which provides, among other things, that without further evidence or other intervening procedure the Commission may issue and serve upon the respondent herein findings as to the facts and conclusion based thereon and an order disposing of the proceeding, and the Order 32F. T. C.

Commission having made its findings as to the facts and conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

It is ordered, That the respondent, J. Herbert Blackhurst, his representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of classroom books or other printed matter in commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Representing in any :manner or by any means· that his business is owned, conducted, or supervised by a university or other institution of higher learning;

2. Using the word "University," or any other word or words of similar import and meaning, as part of any trade or corporate name under which said products are sold.

It ia further ordered, That the respondent shall, within 60 days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a. report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order.

SHAPIRO FELT RUG CO., ETC. ET AL. 579 Syllabus

← 32 F.T.C. 564 · 32 F.T.C. 579 →