Marcus A. Weinberg and Belle Weinberg, trading as Pacific China Company
Volume 41 · 41 F.T.C. 1
deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons
Cite this decision
Marcus A. Weinberg and Belle Weinberg, trading as Pacific China Company, 41 F.T.C. 1 (1945). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v041-0001
Report an error in this record (decision id v041-0001)
Cited by 1 later FTC decisions
- WALTER W. GRAMER cited_neutral
Cites
- 28 F.T.C. 618 — STORYK BROS., INC cited_neutral
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THE Marrer oF MARCUS A. WEINBERG AND BELLE WEINBERG, TRAD- ING AS PACIFIC CHINA COMPANY; AND RAY Y. CLIFFE, TRADING AS PACIFIC CHINA COMPANY MODIFIED CEASE AND DESIST ORDER Docket $885. Order, July 5, 1945 Modified order in proceeding in question, in which original order issued on Feb. 17, 1939, 28 F.T.C. 618, requiring respondents, their representatives, etc., in connection with the offer, etc., of earthenware or so-called chinaware products and so-called sales plans, including redeemable cards, eoupons, ete., to cease and desist from using the terms “free,” “without cost,” ete., to describe products offered to holders of “punch cards,” or “certificates” in redemption thereof; and from representing that the offer of any of said products is “introductory,” or constitutes a “special” offer; or that respondents manufacture the products sold by them. Mr. J. W. Brookfield, Jr. for the Commission. Hickey, Hall & Junge, of Chicago, IIl., for respondents. Moprrtep OrprErR TO CEASE AND DESIST This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answer of respondents, in which answer respondents admitted all material al- _legations of fact set forth in said complaint and waived all intervening procedure and further hearing as to said facts, and the Commission having duly made and issued its findings as to the facts, conclusion, and order to cease and desist dated February 17, 1939, and the Commission having further considered said order to cease and desist heretofore issued and having on July 13, 1944, in the case of Marcus A. Weinberg, February 16, 1945, in the case of Ray Y. Cliffe, and May 2, 1945, in the case of Mrs. Belle Weinberg served upon each of said respondents due notice to appear and show cause at a time and place fixed why this case should not be reopened for the Order 41 F.T.C. purpose of modifying said order to cease and desist in the manner and to the extent set out in said notice, to which notice respondents failed to make a return; and having considered’ the matter and the record herein and having concluded that the public interest requires such action, the Commission issues this its modified order to cease and desist:
It is ordered That the respondents Marcus A. Weinberg, Belle Weinberg, and Ray Y. Cliffe, their representatives, agents, and employees, individually and directly, or trading as the Pacific China Company, or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of earthenware or so-called chinaware products and so-called sales plans, inclusive of redeemable cards, coupons, certificates, bonds, and literature relating to said products, in interstate commerce and in the District of Columbia, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. Using the terms “free,” “without cost,” or any other terms of similar import or meaning, to describe, designate, or refer to products offered or delivered to holders of so-called “punch cards” or “certificates” in redemption thereof.
2. Representing that the offer of any of said products is “introductory,” or for the purpose of advertising and introducing the same, when in fact said offer is made for the purpose of selling the particular items or set of products included in said offer, and constitutes an offer regularly and continuously made and used in the course of offering for sale and selling said products. 3. Representing that the offer of any of said products, or any catalog prices listed in connection, therewith, constitutes or partakes of the nature of a “special” offer or opportunity provided by respondents for a limited time only, when in fact the same constitutes an offer or prices regularly and continuously made or used in the course of offering for sale and selling such products. 4. Representing that the respondents, or any of them, are the manufacturers of the products sold by them, unless and until such respondents actually own and operate, or directly and absolutely control,'a manufacturing plant wherein such products are manufactured by them.
It is further ordered 'That the respondents shall, within 60 days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.
STANDARD CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY 3 Syllabus