Eastman Kodak Company
Volume 44 · 44 F.T.C. 14
Cite this decision
Eastman Kodak Company, 44 F.T.C. 14 (1947). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v044-0002
Report an error in this record (decision id v044-0002)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In ror Marrer oF EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY ORDER SUSPENDING IN PART THE OPERATION OF CEASH AND DESIST ORDER ISSUED SEPTEMBER 9, 1944 Docket 4322. Order, July 3, 1947 Order in proceeding in question, in which original findings and cease and desist order are reported in 39 F. T. C. 154, and findings, as modified, and order, in 41 F. T. C. 187; and in which— : (a) The Commission found, for the reasons set forth, that respondent’s resale price agreements with retail dealer customers in some 44 States with fair trade acts, entered into pursuant to respondent’s resale price maintenance policy and system since 1938, did not fall within the saving provisions of the Miller-Tydings amendment to the Sherman Antitrust Act, approved August 17, 1987; and (bo) Said original order required respondent, among other things, in connection with the offer, sale, etc., of its “Kodachrome Film” to cease and desist from entering into any contract, etc., with its dealer-customers which provided that its said film or magazine film is not to be advertised, offered, or sold by them at prices less than those specified by it, or from enforcing or continuing in operation any such contract, ete., as there set out in detail, subject to the provision that “if conditions later change so that there are other commodities of the same general class produced or disrtibuted by others which are sold in free and open competition with respondent’s Kodachrome or Magazine Film, then, and in that event, the Commission will, upon proper showing by the respondent, reconsider the terms of this order in the light of such new conditions” ;
Suspending operation of said order to cease and desist as to Kodachrome Film— following Commission consideration of respondent’s petition and affidavits attached thereto, a certain stipulation, and the record in the matter, and its opinion that ‘“‘respondent’s Kodachrome Film is now being sold in free and open competition with color film manufactured, sold, and distributed by General Aniline & Film Corp. so as to bring in operation the provision contained in said order to cease and desist of September 9, 1944, insofar as Kodachrome Film is concerned for the period and during the time that Ansco Color Film manufactured by General Aniline & Film Corp. is sold in | free and open competition with respondent’s Kodachrome Film”; subject to the provision that nothing therein contained shall affect the operation of said order, insofar as it applies to respondent’s “Magazine Film.” Before Mr. John P. Bramhall, trial examiner.
Mr. Daniel J. Murphy for the Commission.
Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton & Devans and Mr. William F. Shepard, of Rochester, N. Y., and White & Case, of New York City, for respondent.
EASTMAN KODAK CO. 15 14 Order Order SUSPENDING IN Parr THE OPERATION oF CEASE AND DESIST Orper Issurp SepreMper 9, 1944 This cause coming on to be heard by the Commission on petition of respondent, Eastman Kodak Co., filed March 20, 1947, to reopen the above proceeding for the purpose of receiving evidence as to free and open competition in Kodachrome Film between the respondent and General Aniline & Film Corp. and that the order be suspended pending further order by the Commission upon said testimony and that the Commission direct its attorneys, agents, and representatives to withhold commencement of any further actions or proceedings to enforce said order or to recover penalties against the respondent with respect to Kodachrome Film; and It appearing that subsequent thereto a stipulation of facts and conclusions, dated April 2, 1947, was entered into between the respondent, by its attorneys, and Daniel J. Murphy, Assistant Chief Trial Counsel of the Federal Trade Commission, providing that the facts set out therein be considered as established in this proceeding in passing upon the petition filed by the respondent on March 20, 1947; and It appearing to the Commission that, by the terms of the stipulation of facts the General Aniline & Film Corp. of Delaware, operating a factory at Binghampton, N. Y., has, since March 1946, made color film, both still and motion picture, produced by it and sold under its brand name “Ansco,” generally available to dealers in photographic supplies in the principal cities of the United States for resale by them to amateur and professional photographers; and It further appearing that, by the terms of the order to cease and desist issued by the Commission on September 9, 1944, the respondent was prohibited in connection with the offering for sale, sale, and distribution of its Kodachrome Film from entering into any contract, agreement, or understanding, either directly or indirectly, with its dealer-customers, which provides that respondent’s Kodachrome Film or Magazine Film is not to be advertised, offered for sale, or sold by such dealer-customers at prices less than those specified or fixed by the respondent or from enforcing or continuing in operation any contract, agreement, or understanding with its dealer-customers to fix or maintain minimum resale prices at which respondent’s Kodachrome Film or Magazine Film is to be offered for sale or sold; and It further appearing that said order to cease and desist, issued Sep- 789940—50——5 Order 44¥F.T.C.
tember 9, 1944, contained, in addition to said prohibitions, the following proviso:
Provided, however, That if conditions later change so that there are other commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others which are sold in free and open competition with respondent’s Kodachrome or Magazine Film, then, and in that event, the Commission will, upon proper showing by the respondent, reconsider the terms of this order in the light of such new conditions. and The Commission having considered the petition of the respondent filed March 20, 1947, and affidavits attached thereto, the stipulation as to the facts dated April 2, 1947, and the record herein, including the terms of the order to cease and desist heretofore issued on September 9, 1944, and being now of the opinion that respondent’s Kodachrome Film is now being sold in free and open competition with color film manufactured, sold, and distributed by General Aniline & Film Corp. so as to bring in operation the proviso contained in said order to cease and desist of September 9, 1944, insofar as Kodachrome Film is concerned; and The Commission being now fully advised in the premises: It is ordered, That the operation of the order to cease and desist heretofore issued by the Commission on September 9, 1944, insofar as Kodachrome Film is involved, be suspended for the period and during the time that Ansco Color Film manufactured by General Aniline & Film Corp. is sold in free and open competition with respondent’s Kodachrome Film.
It is further ordered, That nothing herein contained shall affect the operation of the Commission’s order of September 9, 1944, insofar as it applies to respondent’s Magazine Film.
THE BOLTA CO; ET AL.” m" yd Syllabus