Consumer Law Library

Chester-Kent, Inc.

Volume 52 · 52 F.T.C. 419

Citation
52 F.T.C. 419
Docket
6374
Complaint
1955-06-27
Decision
1955-10-26
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
Food and drug products
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Hearing examiner
ABNER E. LIPSCOMB (Hearing Examiner)
Commission counsel
r. Morton N es7nith
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Chester-Kent, Inc., 52 F.T.C. 419 (1955). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v052-0055

Report an error in this record (decision id v052-0055)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF CHESTER-KENT, INC.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6371r. Complaint, J1me 27, 1955-Dectsion, Oct. , 1955 Consent order requiring a seller in St. Paul, Minn., to cease disseminating false advertising concerning the health-giving properties of its products "Yo- Zyme" and "Vinol Tonic.

Before Jrlr. Abner E. Lipscomb hearing examiner. r. Morton N es7nith for the Commission. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Chester-Kent, Inc.. a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Chester-I(ent, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota, with its office and principal place of business located at 96-102 South Wabasha Street, St. Paul, Minnesota. PAR. 2. Respondent is now and for more than one year last past has been engaged in the advertising and sale of food and drug products as "food" and "drugs~' are defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

The designation used by respondent for its said products and the formulas and directions for use thereof are as follows: Designation: Yo-Zyme Formula:

Cheese Whey 670/0 Yogurt 200/0 Brewers Yeast 130/0 Vanillin as flavor Directions for use:

2 or 3 tablets with each meal.

Complaint 52 F. T. C.

Designation: Vinol Tonic Formula:

2 fluid ounces contains:

1900 mg. Ferrous Gluconate 6 mcg. Vitamin B 3 mg. Vitamin B with glycerophosphates of magnesium and calcium in base of Muscatel and Tokay wines providing alcohol of 160/0. Directions for use: Adults and children over 12 years, 1 tablespoonful, 4 times daily. Children 6-12 years, 1 tablespoonful, 3 times daily. Respondent has caused said products, when sold, to be transported from its place of business in the State of Minnesota, to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States. Respondent maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a course of trade in said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, between and among the various States of the United States.

. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of its aforesaid business, respondent has disseminated and caused the dissemination of advertisements concerning said products by the United States mails and by various means in conmlerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, including but not limited to advertisements inserted in newspapers and magazines of general circulation and in circulars and leaflets, for the purpose of inducing and which were likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of said products; and respondent has also disseminated and has caused the dissemination of advertisements concerning said products by various means, including but not limited to the means aforesaid, for the purpose of inducing and which were likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of its said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 4. Through the use of statements appearing in said advertisements respondent represented and now represents, directly or implication, that the use of Yo-Zyme is effective in: (1) supplanting noxious bacteria in the intestines; (2) checking the growth of putrefying bacteria in the intestines; (3) promoting a healthy intestinal flora;

(4) maintaining lactic acid producing organisms in the intestines; (5) aiding the digestion of other food by supplying protein-splitting enzymes;

(6) improving digestion and intestinal health; (7) aiding in the absorption of alkaline minerals; (8) protecting vitamins;

CHESTER-KENT, INC. 421 4.19 . Complaint (9) establishing body resistance to disease; and (10) the treatment of weak kidneys, gall bladder troubles, constipation, headaches, nervousness, lack of pep, ulcers, gas, stOlnach upsets, diarrhea, nausea, eczema, hemorrhoids, and migraine. Through the use of the statements appearing in said advertisements respondent also represented, and does now represent, directly or by implication, that the use of its product designated Vinol Tonic will give pep and energy to young children and older people, and that every pregnant woman will develop iron deficiency anemia unless she receives vigorous iron therapy.

PAR. 5. The said advertisements were and are misleading in material respects and constitute "false advertisements " as that term defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. In truth and in fact the use of Yo-Zyme, as directed, will not be effective in : (1) supplanting noxious bacteria in the intestines; (2) checking the growth of putrefying bacteria in the intestines; (3) promoting a healthy intestinal flora;

( 4) maintaining lactic acid producing organisms in the intestines; ( 5) aiding the absorption of alkaline minerals; (6) protecting vitamins;

(7) the treatment of constipation or headaches; for the reason that a daily intake of lactose of from 30 to 40 times that supplied by the Cheese ~Vhey in Yo-Zyme is required to be effective in bringing about. the foregoing results.

Further, the use of Yo-Zyme without regard to the amount taken will not be effective in:

(8) aiding the digestion of other food, by supplying protein-splitting enzymes or otherwise;

(9) improving digestion or intestinal health; (10) establishing body resistance to disease; and (11) the treatment of weak kidneys, gall bladder troubles, nervousness, lack of pep, ulcers, gas, stomach upsets, diarrhea, nausea, eczema hemorrhoids.

In truth and in fact, respondent' s product Vinol Tonic will not give young children or older people pep and energy unless those persons lack such pep and energy due solely to iron deficiency. Although many pregnant women will develop an iron deficiency anemia unless they receive vigorus iron therapy, this condition will not develop in all cases in the absence of such therapy.

PAR. 6. The use by the respondent of the foregoing false and misleading statements and representations contained in said advertisements has had and now has the capacity and tendency to mislead and deceive a subtantial portion of the purchasing public into the errone- Decision 52 F. T. C.

ous and mistaken belief that such statements and representations are true and into the purchase of said products because of such erroneous and mistaken belief.

PAR. 7. The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent, as herein alleged, are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade' Commission Act. INITIAL DECISION BY ABNER E. LIPSCOMB, HEARING EXAMINER On June 27, 1955, the Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint in this proceeding, charging the Respondent with unfair and deceptive acts and practices in connection with the sale in commerce of a drug preparation designated "Yo-Zyme " in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Thereafter, on July 28, 1955, the Respondent filed with the Commission its answer to the complaint, and on Augui;t 24, 1955, entered into an agreement with counsel supporting the complaint, and, pursuant thereto, submitted to the hearing examiner an Agreement Containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist, disposing of all of the issues involved in this proceeding.

Respondent is identified in the agreement as a Minnesota corporation, with its principal office and place of business located at 96-102 South Wabasha Street, St. Paul, Minnesota. alleged in the com- Respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts plaint, and agrees that the record herein may be taken "as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly met in accordance with such allegations " which is interpreted to mean that Respondent agrees that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations. Respondent waives any further procedure before the hearing exof fact or con- aminer and the Commission; the making of findings challenge or con- clusions of law; and all of the rights it may have to test the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement. All parties agree that Respondent' s answer shall be considered as having been withdrawn; that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; and that this agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondent that it has violated the law as alleged in the complaint.

The agreement sets forth that the order to cease and desist contained after a full therein shall have the same force and effect as if entered CHESTER-KENT, INC. 423 419 Order hearing; that the order to cease and desist may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; and that the ,complaint herein may be used in construing the terms of the order. In his memorandum the Agreement Containing Consent Order to 'Cease and Desist, counsel in support of the complaint states that the agreement has been submitted to and approved by the Division of Scientific Opinions, and that the order contained therein covers all of the substantive charges of the complaint and provides an appropriate :basis for settlement and disposition of this proceeding. In the light of the aforesaid statement and from an examination of the order and the complaint herein, it appears that such order will ;safeguard the public interest to the same extent as could be accomplished by the issuance of an order after full hearing and all other adjudicative procedure waived in said agreement. Therefore, in consonance with the terms of the aforesaid agreement, the hearing -examiner accepts the Agreement Containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist and finds that the Commission has jurisdiction over the Respondent and over its acts and practices as alleged in the complaint, and that this proceeding is in the public interest. Accordingly, It is ordered That the Respondent, Chester-I\:ent, Inc., a corporation, and its officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly ,or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the ,offering for sale, sale or distribution of Yo-Zyme and Vinol Tonic or any other products of substantially the same composition or possessing substantially similar properties, whether sold under the same name or under any other name, do forthwith cease and desist from directly or indirectly:

1. Disseminating, or causing to be disseminated, by means of the United States mails, or by any means in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, any advertisement which represents, directly or by implication: (a) That the use of Yo-Zyme as directed: (1) will be effective in supplanting noxious bacteria in the intestines ;

(2) will be effective in checking the growth of putrefying bacteria in the intestines;

(3) will be effective in promoting healthy intestinal flora; (4) will be effective in maintaining lactic-acid-producing organisms in the intestines;

(5) will be effective in aiding the absorption of alkaline minerals; (6) will be effective in protecting vitamins; (7) will be effective in the treatment of constipation or headaches; (b) That the use of Yo-Zyme, without regard to the amount taken: 424 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ' DECISJONS 52 F. T. C. Decision (1) will be effective in aiding the digestion of other food, by supplying protein -splitting enzymes or otherwise; (2) will improve digestion or intestinal health; (3) will establish body resistance to disease; (4) will be effective in the treatment of weak kidneys, gall~bladder troubles, nervousness, lack of pep, ulcers, gas stomach upsets, diarrhea nausea, eczema and hemorrhoids; .

((J) That the use of Vino~ Tonic will give young children or older people pep and energy unless those persons lack such pep and energy due solely to iron deficiency;

(d) That all pregnant women will develop an iron deficiencyanemia unless they receive vigorous iron therapy; 2. Disselninating, or causing to be disseminated, any advertisements, by any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase in commerce, as "com~ merce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of the food and drug preparations "Yo-Zyme" and "Vinol Tonic " which advertisement contains any of the representations prohibited in paragraph 1 of this order.

DECISION OF THE CO~f1tnSSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 26th day of October, 1955, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :

I t is ordered That respondent Chester- ICent, Inc., a corporation file shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has conlplied with the order to cease and desist.

GENERAL PRODUCTS CORP. ET .AL. 425 Complaint.

← 52 F.T.C. 413 · 52 F.T.C. 425 →