Consumer Law Library

The Elwell-Parker Electric Company

Volume 53 · 53 F.T.C. 226

Citation
53 F.T.C. 226
Docket
6329
Complaint
1955-04-15
Decision
1956-09-06
Document type
dismissal
Case type
antitrust
Industry
industrial trucks manufacturing
Outcome
dismissed
Commission counsel
William H. Smith
Respondent counsel
Stage & Butler, of Cleveland, Ohio
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

The Elwell-Parker Electric Company, 53 F.T.C. 226 (1956). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v053-0036

Report an error in this record (decision id v053-0036)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In THE MatTrer oF THE ELWELL-PARKER ELECTRIC COMPANY ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 2(&) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket 6829. Complaint, Apr. 15, 1955—Decision, Sept. 6, 1956 Order dismissing, for lack of proof of the effect on competition required by the statute, complaint charging a manufacturer of industrial trucks, with principal place of business in Cleveland, Ohio, with discriminating in price by means of cumulative and non-cumulative quantity discount plans, in violation of Sec. 2(a) of the Clayton Act. Mr. William H. Smith for the Commission. Stage & Butler, of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Inittat Decision Dismisstnc Compiaint By Frank Hier, Hoearrnc Examiner ‘ Counsel in support of the complaint in this proceeding, having moved, before any evidence taken, to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, on the ground that he is unable to prove the effect on competition prescribed by the statute under which the complaint is brought, and nothing to the contrary appearing, and counsel for respondent obviously having no objection, said motion is granted, and, accordingly, it is ordered, That the complaint herein be, and the same hereby is, dismissed without prejudice.

DECISION OF THE COMMISSION Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 6th day of September, 1956, become the decision of the Commission. Commissioners Gwynne and Mason not participating. LEWIS-SHEPARD CO. ET AL. 227 Decision

← 53 F.T.C. 218 · 53 F.T.C. 227 →