Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Volume 53 · 53 F.T.C. 852
deceptive advertisingproduct labeling
Cite this decision
Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., 53 F.T.C. 852 (1957). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v053-0138
Report an error in this record (decision id v053-0138)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In Tae Matter oF PROPPER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL. CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6665. Complaint, Oct. 26, 1956—Decision, Apr. 18, 1957 Consent order requiring an importer of unmarked parts of hypodermie syringes in Long Island City, New York, to cease offering the completed hypodermic syringes assembled therefrom for sale to the purchasing public without disclosing that the barrels and plungers were imported from Japan. Mr. Kent P. Kratz for the Commission.
Mr. Milton Friedman, of New York, N.Y., for respondents. Initrau Decision By ABNER E. Lirscoms, Hpartinc Examiner ' The complaint herein was issued on October 26, 1956, charging Respondents with violation of the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act by failure to disclose that essential and material parts of the hypodermic syringes which they assemble and thereafter offer for sale and sell in commerce are of foreign origin, being imported from Japan.
On February 11, 1957, Respondent Seymour Schuman, individually and as President of Respondent Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., his counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist, which was approved by the Director and the Assistant Director of the Commission’s Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter submitted tc the Hearing Examiner for consideration.
Respondent Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., is identified in the agreement as a New York corporation, with its office and principal place of business located at 10-34 44th Drive, Long Island City, New York, and individual Respondent Seymour Schuman as President-Treasurer and sole stockholder of said corporate Respondent, with his office and principal place of business at the same address. Respondent Beatrice Schuman is identified as the wife of Respondent Seymour Schuman, merely a norminal, figurehead Vice-President of the corporate Respondent, and not a stockholder thereof. The agreement, and an affidavit executed by Respondent Seymour Schuman, which is expressly made a part thereof, state that Respondent Beatrice Schuman neither formulates, directs nor controls the policies, acts and practices of the corporate Respondent, and all parties agree that the complaint should be dismissed as to her.
PROPPER MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL. 853 852 Order Respondent Seymour Schuman, individually and as President of the corporate Respondent, admits all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint; agrees that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been duly made in accordance with such allegations; and waives any further procedure before the Hearing Examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all the rights he or the corporate Respondent may have to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement. All parties agree that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; that the order to cease and desist as contained in the agreement shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing, and may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the complaint herein may be used in construing the terms of said order; and that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint.
After consideration of the allegations of the complaint and the provisions of the agreement and the proposed order, the Hearing Examiner is of the opinion that such order constitutes a satisfactory disposition of this proceeding. Accordingly, in consonance with the terms of the aforesaid agreement, the Hearing Examiner accepts the Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease And Desist; finds that the Commission has jurisdiction over the Respondents and over their acts and practices as alleged in the complaint; and finds that this proceeding is in the public interest. Therefore, It is ordered, That the Respondents Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., a corporation, and its officers, and Seymour Schuman, individually and as an officer of said corporation, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of hypodermic syringes, or similar products, which are composed in substantial part of imported materials, in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Offering for sale, selling or distributing said products made in whole or in substantial, material and essential part in Japan without clearly disclosing such Japanese origin on said products in such manner that it cannot readily be hidden or obliterated. Decision 53 E.T.C.
It is further ordered, That the complaint herein, insofar as it relates to Beatrice Schuman, individually or as an officer of Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 13th day of April, 1957, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly :
It is ordered, that respondents Propper Manufacturing Company, Inc., a corporation, and its officers, and Seymour Schuman, individually and as an officer of said corporation, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist. COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 855 Decision