Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

General Mower Corporation

Volume 55 · 55 F.T.C. 442

Citation
55 F.T.C. 442
Docket
7059
Complaint
1958-02-07
Decision
1958-09-24
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
power lawn mowers
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Hearing examiner
JOHN B. POINDEXTER (Hearing Examiner)
Respondent counsel
B. Walsh of Buffalo, N
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

General Mower Corporation, 55 F.T.C. 442 (1958). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v055-0071

Report an error in this record (decision id v055-0071)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF GENERAL l\LOWER CORPORATION ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7059. Complaint, Feb. 1958-Dec.ision, Sept. 24, 1958 Consent order requiring distributors of power lawn mowers in Buffalo, N.Y., to cease-in newspaper advertising and in letters, price lists, brochures, and circulars mailed to retailers in various States-representing as the prices at which their mowers were regularly sold at retail list prices which were in fact fictitious.

Mr. Ames W. vVillia.rns supporting the complaint. Jaeckle, Fleischmann, Kelly, S'WaTt Augspu' rge1' by 1111'. John B. Walsh of Buffalo, N. , for respondents. INITIAL DECISION BY JOHN B. POINDEXTER, HEARING EXAMINER On February 7, 1958 , the Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint alleging that General Mower Corporation, a corporation, Louis Faxstein, Harry Faxstein, Max Faxstein and Arthur Ganger, individually and as officers of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, had violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act by making fictitious pricing and savings claims for its power lawn mowers. After issuance and service of the complaint, the respondents their counsel, and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement for a consent order. The order disposes of the matters complained about. The agreement has been approved by the director and assistant director of the Bureau of Litigation. The pertinent provisions of said agreement are as follows: Respondents admit all jurisdictional facts; the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order; the order shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing and the said agreement shall not become a part of the official record of the proceeding unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; the record herein shall consist solely of the complaint and the agreement; respondents waive the requirement that the decision must contain a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; respondents waive further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission, and the order may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided GENERAL MOWER CORPORATION ET AL. 443 442 Order by. statute for other orders; respondents waive any right challenge or contest the validity of the order entered in accordance with the agreement and the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission alleged in the bycomplaint.respondents that they have violated the law as The undersigned hearing examiner having considered the agreement and proposed order and being of the opinion that the acceptance thereof will be in the public interest, hereby accepts such agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and issues the following order:

JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS 1. Respondent General Mower Corporation, is a corporation existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its office and principal place of N.business located at 1670 Jefferson Avenue, Buffalo 8, 2. Respondents Louis Faxstein, Harry Faxstein, Max Faxstein and Arthur Ganger are individuals and officers of the said corporate respondent, serving respectively as president, vice-president, treasurer and vice-president with their office and principal place of business located at the same place as that of the corporate respondent.

3. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is o'i'dercd That respondents General Mower Corporation, a corporation, and its officers and Louis Faxstein, Harry Faxstein, Max Faxstein and Arthur Ganger, individually and as officers of said corporation, their representatives, agents and employees directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of power lawn mowers, or any other product, in commerce, as "commerce defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forth\with cease and desist from:

1. Using prices, whether identified as " list prices" or otherwise identified, which are in excess of the prices at which their products are regularly and customarily sold at retail. 2. Providing retailers and distributors of their products with material by and through which they may mislead and deceive Decision 55 F.

the purchasing public as to the regular and customary retail prices of their products.

DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice, the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 24th day of September 1958, become the decision of the Commission; and accordingly:

It is. ordered That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

CAPITOL FUR SHOP, INC., ET AL. 445 Decision

← 55 F.T.C. 438 · 55 F.T.C. 445 →