Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Avon Publications, Inc.

Volume 55 · 55 F.T.C. 619

Citation
55 F.T.C. 619
Docket
6911
Complaint
1957-10-07
Decision
1958-10-21
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
book publishing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Charles S. Cox Esq
Respondent counsel
JiViUia1n Gold Esq., of Ne,v York, N
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Cite this decision

Avon Publications, Inc., 55 F.T.C. 619 (1958). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v055-0116

Report an error in this record (decision id v055-0116)

Order status: dismissed_no_order. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF AVON PUBLICATIONS, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6911. Complaint, Oct. 1957-Deci$ion, Oct. , 1958 Consent order requiring three affiliated concerns in New York City to cease selling abridged books or newly titled reprints without disclosing the abridgment and the original title clearly and conspicuously on the front cover and title page in a position readily apparent to the buyer. Charles S. Cox Esq., for the Commission. JiViUia1n Gold Esq., of Ne,v York, N. , for respondents. INITIAL DECISION BY ROBERT L. PIPER HEARING EXAMINER The Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint against the above-named respondents on October 7, 1957, charging them with having violated the Federal Trade Commission Act by misrepresenting the books they sell in commerce. Respondents appeared by counsel and at the conclusion of the case-in-chief entered into an agreement, dated August 25, 1958, containing a consent order to cease and desist, disposing of all the issues in this proceeding without further hearing, which agreement has been duly approved by the Director of the Bureau of Litigation. Said agreement has been submitted to the undersigned, heretofore duly designated to act as hearing examiner herein, for his consideration in accordance with 93.25 of the Rules of Practice of the Commission. Respondents pursuant to the aforesaid agreement, have adn1itted all of the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint and agreed that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had been made duly in accordance with such allegations. Said agreement further provides that respondents waive all further procedural steps before the hearing examiner or the Commission, including the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law and the right to challenge or contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with such agreement. It has also been agreed that the record herein shall consist solely of the complaint and said agreement, that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission that said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not Decision 55 F.

constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint, that said order to cease and desist shall have the same force and effect as if entered after a full hearing and may be altered, modified, or set aside in the manner provided for other orders, and that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order. This proceeding having now come on for final consideration on the complaint and the aforesaid agreement cont.aining the consent order, and it appearing that the order and agreement cover all of the allegations of the complaint and provide for appropriate disposition of this proceeding, the agreement is hereby accepted and ordered filed upon this decision and said agreement becoming part of the Commission s decision pursuant to ~~3.21 and 3. of the Rules of Practice, and the hearing examiner accordingly makes the following findings, for jurisdictional purposes, and order:

1. Respondents Avon Publications, Inc. , Avon Publishing Co., Inc., and Avon Book Sales Corporation are each a corporation existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, except that heretofore on December 13, 1956 Avon Publishing Co. Inc., was duly merged into Avon Publications, Inc. Individual respondents Joseph 1'1:. Mann, Harry Rebell and William Gold are vice president, treasurer and secretary, respectively, of each of said corporate respondents. All of said respondents except Harry Rebell and William Gold have an office and principal place of business located at 575 1'1adison A venue, in the city of New York, State of Ne,v York. Harry Rebell maintains his office at 39 Broadway, New York City, and William Gold maintains his office at 236 East 49th Street, New York City. 2. Subsequent to the issuance of the complaint herein, individual respondent Joseph Meyers departed this life on November 3, 1957, at Cedars of Lebanon Hospital, Los Angeles, Calif. Individual respondent William Gold is an attorney at law and is regularly and actively engaged in the practice of law in New York City. As the attorney for the said corporate respondents he agreed, at the request of said J osephMeyers, to serve as secretary to each of said corporate respondents. Furthermore, at no time did said \Villiam Gold OV.in any shares of stock or, other financial interest in said corporate respondents, and had no part in the running or operation of the business or in formulating the acts and policies of said corporate respondents. Accordingly, the , AVON PUBLICATIONS, INC., ET AL. 621 619 Decision parties agreed that the complaint should be dismissed as to individual respondents William Gold and Joseph Meyers. 3. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subj ect matter of this proceeding and of the respondents hereinabove named. The complaint states a cause of action against said respondents under the Federal Trade Commission Act, and this proceeding is in the interest of the public. ORDER It is ordered That respondents Avon Publications, Inc. , a corporation, Avon Publishing Co., Inc., a corporation, and Avon Book Sales Corporation, a corporation, and their officers, and respondents Joseph M. l\1ann and Harry Rebell, individually and as officers of said corporate respondents Avon Publications, Inc., Avon Publishing Co., Inc., and Avon Book Sales Corporation, and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribution of books in commerce, as "commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Offering for sale or selling any abridged copy of a book unless one of the following words Abridged abridgement condensed" or "condensation " or any other word or phrase st.ating with equal clarity that said book is abridged appears in clear conspicuous type upon the front cover and upon the title page of the book, either in immediate connection with the title or in another position adapted readily to attract the attention of a prospecti ve purchaser;

2. Using or substituting a new title for, or in place of, the original title of the reprinted book unless the original title of the book as previously published appears in clear and conspicuous type upon the front cover and upon the title page of the book either in immediate connection ,with the title or in another position adapted readily to attract the attention of a prospective purchaser.

It is further ordered That this proceeding be and the same hereby is dismissed as to respondents Joseph Meyers and William Gold.

DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice Decision 55 F.

the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 21st day of October 1958 become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly:

It is ordered That the above-named respondents except respondents Joseph Meyers and Willian1 Gold, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist.

EDUCATORS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 623 Order

← 55 F.T.C. 616 · 55 F.T.C. 623 →