General Products Corporation
Volume 55 · 55 F.T.C. 765
deceptive advertisinghealth claimspricing comparisons
Cite this decision
General Products Corporation, 55 F.T.C. 765 (1958). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v055-0143
Report an error in this record (decision id v055-0143)
Cited by 1 later FTC decisions
- AVNET, INC applied
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF GENERAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 7102. Complaint, Mar. 1958-Decision, Nov. , 1958 Consent order requiring distributors in Los Angeles, Calif., of drug preparations containing vitamins and minerals, to cease representing falsely in advertising, including radio broadcasts, that their " VCS" preparation was cheaper than competing products, that the price was specially reduced for a limited time only a,nd available to selected customers only, that the product supplied users with all the essential vitamins and minerals and was of value in conditions resulting from vitamin and mineral deficiensies; and that their "Pounds-Off" preparation contained a newly discovered antihunger ingredient, and that by its use once a day a specific weight loss would be achieved in a prescribed period. MT. John J. McNally for the Commission. Mr. Lee J. Myers of Long Beach, Calif. , for respondents. INITIAL DECISION BY J. EARL Cox, HEARING EXAMINER The complaint charges respondents with the dissemination of false advertisements of their drug and food preparations designated "VCS Formula" and "Pounds-Off", including, but not limited to, radio broadcasts transmitted by the west coast stations of the CBS network, covering the States of Washington, Oregon, and California, which advertisements are misleading in material respects and constitute unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. After the issuance of the complaint, respondents, their counsel and counsel supporting the complaint entered into an agreement containing consent order to cease and desist, which was approved by the director and an assistant director of the Commission Bureau of Litigation, and thereafter transmitted to the hearing examiner for consideration.
The agreement identifies Respondent General Products Corporation as a California corporation, with its office and principal place of business located at 541 North Le Brea, Los Angeles Calif., and respondents David Ormont and Alan Mann individuals and officers of the respondent corporation, having the same offices and places of business as respondent corporation. The agreement provides, among other things, that respondents Order 55 F.
admit all the jurisdictional facts alleged in the complaint, and agree that the record may be taken as if findings of jurisdictional facts had. been duly made in accordance with such allegations; that the record on which the initial decision and the decision of the Commission shall be based shall consist solely of the complaint and this agreement; that the agreement shall not become a part of the official record unless and until it becomes a part of the decision of the Commission; that the complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order agreed upon, which may be altered, modified or set aside in the manner provided for other orders; that the agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that they have violated the law as alleged in the complaint; and that the order set forth in the agreement and hereinafter included in this as if entered after adecisionfullshallhearing.have the same force and effect Respondents waive any further procedural steps before the hearing examiner and the Commission, the making of findings of fact or conclusions of law, and all of the rights they may have to challenge or. contest the validity of the order to cease and desist entered in accordance with the agreement. The order agreed upon fully disposes of all the issues raised in the complaint, and adequately prohibits the acts and practices charged therein as being in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Accordingly, the hearing examiner finds this proceeding to be in the public interest, and accepts the agreement containing consent order to cease and desist as part of the record upon 'which this decision is based. Therefore, It is ordered That respondents, General Products Corporation, and its officers, and David Ormont, and Alan Mann, individually and as officers of said corporation, and respondents' representatives, agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection ,\with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of "VCS Formula" and "Pounds-Off", or any preparations of substantially similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties, whether sold under the same nan1es or any other names, do forthwith cease and desist from, directly or indirectly:
. Disseminating or causing to be disseminated any advertise- GENERAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, ET AL. 767 765 Decision n1ent by means of the United States mails or by any means in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, which advertisement represents, directly or indirectly: (a) That significant savings in 1110ney may be realized through the use of "VCS Formula" in preference to other vitamin and mineral products, unless such is the fact; (b) That the price at which "VCS Formula" is being offered is a special or reduced price when the price is in fact the regular . and customary price at which the product is sold by respondents or that the offer is for only a limited time; (c) That the price at which "VCS Formula" is being offered is available to selected customers only; (d) That "VCS Formula" supplies all of the essential vitamins and minerals to the users thereof;
(e) That "VCS Formula is of value in the correction of a tired-out, run-down feeling, or any other symptom or condition resulting from a vitamin or mineral deficiency, unless expressly limited to instances resulting from a deficiency of one or more of the vitamins supplied in amounts exceeding the minimum daily requirements when taken according to directions; (f) That through the use of the "Pounds-Off" plan, or product, specific or predetermined loss of weight will be achieved within a prescribed period of time;
(g) That "Pounds-Oft'" contains a newly discovered antihunger ingredient;
(h) That in using the "Pounds-Off" plan you need take Pounds-Off" only once each day;
2. Disseminating or causing the dissen1ination of any advertisement by any means for the purpose of inducing or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase in commerce as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act of said preparations, which advertisement contains any of the representations prohibited in paragraph 1 hereof. DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND ORDER TO FILE REPORT OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Section 3.21 of the Commission s Rules of Practice the initial decision of the hearing examiner shall, on the 19th day of Novmeber 1958, become the decision of the Commission; and, accordingly:
Decision 55 F.
It is o1'dered That respondents General Products Corporation a corporation, and David Ormont and Alan Mann, individually and as officers of said corporation, shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist. C. F. BUELOW COMPANY, ET AL. 769 Complaint