Consumer Law Library

The Martin-Senour Company

Volume 61 · 61 F.T.C. 425

Citation
61 F.T.C. 425
Docket
C-209
Decision
not printed in the source
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
plastic metal menders
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labeling

Cite this decision

The Martin-Senour Company, 61 F.T.C. 425 (1962). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v061-0048

Report an error in this record (decision id v061-0048)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE ~1A TTER OF TI-IE ~L\.R.TIN-SENOUR COi\ipany CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TILo\DE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-209. Complaint, Aug. 1962-Decision, At~g. , 196B Consent order requiring a Cleveland distributor of plastic metal menders designated "Blu-Flex" and "Fuse-Tite" to wholesalers, to cease such unfair practices as stating in catalogs "Blu-Flex * * * It' s non-toxic" when fact such product could cause itching or skin irritation; to disclose conspicuously on labels such danger in use and treatment therefor and the fact of the product's flammability; and to mal\:e similar disclosures on labels of its "Fuse-THe" product, as well as the importance of avoiding its vapors. , 426 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIO~S Complaint 61 F. CO:\IPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions or the Federal Trade Commission Acl and by virtue or the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that The ~iartin-Senour Company, a corporation, hE;reinarter rererred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that. a proceeding by it in respect thereor ,yould be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as rollows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent The j\Iartin-Senour Company is a corporation, organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue or the laws or the State of Ohio, with its principal office and place of business located at 101 Prospect Avenue, N.\Y., in the city or Cleveland, State or Ohio.

PAR. 2. Responde.nt is now, and ror some time last past. has been engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution of among other things, plastic metal menders designated "BIn-Flex and "Fuse- Tite" to wholesalers ror resale to retailers. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct or its business, respondent nmy causes, and ror some time last past has caused, its said products \\"hen sold, to be shipped from its place or business in the State of Ohio to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States, and maintains, and at all times mentioned herein has maintained, a substantial course or trade in said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of its business, and ror the purpose or inducing the sale or its plastic metal mender designated "Blu- Flex" respondent has made the, rollowing statement in catalog sheets and by other media: "BIn-Flex * ~: '" It's non-toxic PAR. 5. By and through the use or the aroresaid descriptive statement, respondent represented, directly or by implication, that the plastic metal mender designated "Blu-Flex" is non-toxic. \R. 6. In truth and in fact, the metal mender designated "Bl11- Flex" is not non-toxic as the cream hardener, a. component or said product, contains cyc1ohexanone peroxide which is a primary irritant and sensitizer to the skin and ,yhen the cream hardener is combined with the putty, the other component or said product, to m.ake said metal mender, the product resulting thererrom is not non-toxic. and may cause itching or skin irritation. Thererore, the statement and representation set rorth in paragraph 4 was, and is, false, misleading and deceptive.

THE MARTIN-SENOUR CO. 427 42.) Complain t PAR. 7. The labels on the products composing the respondent's plastic metal menders designated "Blu-Flex:' and "Fuse- Tite~' are misleading in the following respects:

(a) The cyclohexanone peroxide contained in the cream hardener \\which is a component of the plastic metal mender designated "Blu- Flex, may be flammable if coming in contact ,,'ith heat or flame and may through prolonged or repeated contact \with the skin irritate sensitize the skin and, therefore, in case of contact should be flushed from the skin. Because it contains cyc1ohexanone peroxide, the cream hardener is toxic if taken internally and, therefore, should be kept out of reach of children. If said cream hardener containing cyclohexanone peroxide is ingested, vomiting should be induced and a physician consulted. The label on the respondent's cream hardener is misleading in that it fails to reveal these material facts with respect to the consequences which may result from the use of said product. directed on the label for the putty, \which is a component of ;'Blu- Flex, and with respect to conditions of storage of the cream hardener. (b) The label on the respondent's putty used in the plastic metal mender designated "BIn-Flex" is misleading in that it fails to reveal the material fact that after it is mixed \\ith the cream hardener the product resulting therefrom may through prolonged or repeated contact \with the skin irritate or sensitize the skin and, therefore, in case of contact should be flushed from the skin. (c) The label on the respondent's liquid hardener, which is a component of the plastic metal mender designated "Fnse- Tite\ contains only a statement as to storing it in a cool place and cautionary statements as to the product being irritating to the skin, that the product should be flushed from the skin and that it should be kept a\\ay from children. Because it contains methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, the liquid hardener is toxic and if taken internally, vomiting should be induced and a physician consulted. The methyl ethyl ketone peroxide in the liquid hardener may be flammable if coming in contact with heat or flame. The vapors from the methyl ethyl ketone peroxide in the liquid hardener may be harmful if inhaled and, therefore, the product should be used in a \yell ventilated area and the yapors avoided. The label on the responde,nt's liquid hardener is misleading in that it fails to reveal these material facts with respect to the consequences \which may result from the use of the said product as directed on the label for the putty, which is a, component of "Fuse-Tite, and with respect to conditions of storage of the liquid hardener. (d) After the putty used in the plastic metal mender designated Fuse- Tite" is combined \with the liquid hardener, the product result- ,\ Decision and Order 61 F.

ing therefrom ma.y through prolonged or repeated contact with the skin irritate or sensitize the skin and, therefore, in case of contact should be flushed froln the skin. After the liquid hardener is combined ",ith the putty to make the plastic metal mender designated Fuse- Tite, the vapors from the methyl ethyl ketone peroxide contained in the liquid hardener may be harmful if inhaled and, therefore the plastic metal mendeT should be used in a well ventilated area and the va pots avoided. The label on the respondents putty used in the plastic met al mender designated "Fuse- Tite" is misleading in that fails to reveal these material facts with respect to the consequences which may result from the use of the product as directed on its label. PAR. 8. In the course and conduct of its business, at all times mentioned herein, respondent has been in substantial competition, in commerce, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of plastic metal rnenders of the same general kind and nature as those sold by respondent.

PAR. 9. The use by respondent of the aforesaid false, misleading and deceptive. statement, representation, and practice and failure to warn the purchasing public on the labels of the products of the dangers attenc1a.nt to the use of the products have had, and now have, the capacity and tendency to mislead members of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statement and representation was and is true and that there is no danger in use of the products and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondenfs products by reason of said erroneous and mistal::en beliefs. PAR. 10. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, were, and are, all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of the respondent's competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of coin petition in commerce and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a, draft of complaint ,,-which the Bureau of Deceptive Practices proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and ,which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent and c.ounsel for the Commission having thereafter exec.uted an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by THE MARTIN-SENOUR CO. 429 425 Decision and Order the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statenlent that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission rules; and The Commission, having reason to believe that the respondent. has violated the Federal Trade Commission Act, and having determined that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, hereby issues its complaint, accepts said agreement makes the follmying jurisdictional findings and enters the follo"wing order: 1. Respondent, The ~lartin-Senour Company, is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, with its office and principal place of business oflocatedOhio.at 101 Prospect Avenue N:YV., in the city of Cleveland, State 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject mattet of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondent The :Martin-Senour Company, a corporation, and its officers, representatives, agents and employees directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution in commerce, as "commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of plastic metal menders designated "Blu-Flex" and "Fuse-Tite, or any other product or products of similar composition or possessing substantially siInilar properties under whatever name or names sold, do forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Representing, directly or by implication, that the plastic metal mender designated "BIn-Flex, or any other product of similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties is non-toxic or will not cause itching or skin irritation. 2. Using a label on the container for the cream hardener "which does not set forth in a clear and conspicuous manner the following statements: "CAUTION: I\::eep rnvay from heat or flame. Keep out of reach of children. If taken internally, induce vomiting; consult physician. A. void prolonged or repeated contact with skin. In case of contact, flush skin with ,yater. 3. Using a label on the container for the putty u(;::ed in the plastic metal meneler designated " Blu- Flex :' or any other product Complaint 61 F.

of similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties, ,yhieh does not set forth in a dear and conspicuous manner the following statements: "CAUTION: After mixing with cream hardener, avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin. In case of contact, flush skin ,with "-after.

4. Using a label on the container for the liquid hardener which does not set forth in a dear and conspicuous manner the following statements: "CAUTION: Keep away from heat or flame. Keep out of reach of children. If taken internally induce vomiting; consult physician. A yoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin. In case of contact, flush skin with ,vater. Use in well yentilated area; avoid yapors.

5. Using a label on the container for the putty used in the plastic. metal mender desig11ated "Fuse-Tite, or any other product of similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties, ,vhieh does not set forth in a dear and conspicuous manner the follo\ving statements: "CAUTION: After mixing ,with liquid hardener, avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin. In case of contact, flush skin with ,,-ateI'. Use in ,,-ell-yen- . tilated area; avoid vapors~ It is fuJ'thel' oTCZe7' That the respondent herein shall, ,,-within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and

← 61 F.T.C. 421 · 61 F.T.C. 430 →