Surprise Brassiere Co., Inc.
Volume 71 · 71 F.T.C. 868
Cite this decision
Surprise Brassiere Co., Inc., 71 F.T.C. 868 (1967). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v071-0072
Report an error in this record (decision id v071-0072)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE iatter OF SURPRISE BRASSIERE CO., INC., ET AL.
ORDER , OPI IONS , ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECTION 2 (d) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket 8581,. Cmnplnint, June 1963-Decision, June 1967. Order requiring a New York City manufacturer of brassieres, girdles and corselettes to cease discriminating among its customers in the payment of promotional allowances in violation of Section 2 (d) of the Clayton Act. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the parties respondent named in the caption hereof, and hereinafter more particularly designated and clescribecl, have violated and are now violating the provisions of subsection (d) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act (L. , Title 15, Sec. 13), as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, appl'veci June 19, 1936 , hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges with respect thereto as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Surprise Brassiere Co. , Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Xew York with its principal offce and place of business located at 102 iaclison Avenue New York City, Xew York.
Samuel Dosik, an individual, is president of the above corporation and Eugene Newman, an individual, is secretary-treasurer of the same corporation. These individuals formulate, direci and control the policies, acts and practices of the above named corporate respondent.
PAH. 2. Respondents are now, and for many years past have been, engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of women s brassieres, girdles and corselettes \with an annual gross Complaint 71 F.
that the Commission should issue its Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order consistent with said Opinion. Now therefore, it is hen;by ordered That the initial decision and proposed order of the hearing examiner be and they hereby are set aside in their entirety;
A nd it is further ordered That the attached Findings of Fact Conclusions and Order be and they hereby are entered and issued by the Commission in final disposition of this proceeding.