Consumer Law Library

Green & Rothman

Volume 75 · 75 F.T.C. 405

Citation
75 F.T.C. 405
Docket
C-1502
Complaint
1969-03-11
Decision
1969-03-11
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
Fur Products Labeling Act
Industry
fur manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labeling

Cite this decision

Green & Rothman, 75 F.T.C. 405 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v075-0042

Report an error in this record (decision id v075-0042)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF GREEN & ROTHMAN, ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FUR PRODUCTS LABELING ACTS Docket (;-1502. Complaint, Mar. 1969-Decision, Mar. , 1969 Consent order requiring a New York City manufacturing furrier to cease misbranding and falsely invoicing its fur products, and furnishing' false guaranties that its fur products are not misbranded or falsely invoiced. 394 Syllabus thereafter distributes any of said products under any of respondent' s brand names or labels.

It is further ordered That within sixty (60) days after this order becomes final, and annually thereafter, respondent shall furnish to the Federal Trade Commission a verified written report setting forth the manner and form in which it intends to comply, is complying, or has complied with paragraph I this order.

It is further ordered That in the event the Commission issues any order or rule which is less restrictive than the provisions of paragraph I of this order, in any proceeding involving the merger or acquisition of a snack food or miling or cereal company, then the Commission shall, upon the application of General Mils reconsider this order and may reopen this proceeding in order to make whatever revisions, if any, are necessary to bring the foregoing paragraph into conformity with the less stringent restrictions imposed upon respondent' s competitors. It is further ordered That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions.

It is further ordered That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

← 75 F.T.C. 394 · 75 F.T.C. 405 →