Bulova Watch Company, Inc
Volume 78 · 78 F.T.C. 556
Cite this decision
Bulova Watch Company, Inc, 78 F.T.C. 556 (1971). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v078-0065
Report an error in this record (decision id v078-0065)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THe Marrer or BULOVA WATCH COMPANY, INC.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-1887, Complaint, Apr. 1, 1971—Decision, Apr. 1, 1971 Consent order requiring a New York City manufacturer and distributor of watch and clock products to cease fixing the resale prices of its products, refusing to extend guarantees to certain purchasers, refusing to sell to retailers who discount, refusing to sell Bulova brand watches to retailers who refuse to handle other respondent products, and requesting its customers in nonfair trade States to report discounting dealers. CompLaIntT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (Title 15 U.S.C. Section 41 e¢ seg.) and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the party identified in the caption hereof and more particularly described and referred to hereinafter as respondent, has violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the interest of the public, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges as follows: ParacrarH 1. Respondent Bulova Watch Company, Inc. (hereafter sometimes referred to as “Bulova”), is a corporation organized 556 | FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 78 EVTL.C.
with distribute a copy of this order to each of their operating divisions. a It is further ordered, That the complaint served on American Management and Business Service Corporation and Richard B. Rosenkeimer, hereinbefore named as respondents in the caption to this proceeding, said complaint having been withdrawn from adjudication by the Commission by order dated November 10, 1970, be and the same is hereby dismissed, without prejudice to the Commission to institute such future proceedings against said named parties as the Commission in its discretion may deem warranted. Lt is further ordered, ‘That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.