Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Paris Sales Company

Volume 79 · 79 F.T.C. 226

Citation
79 F.T.C. 226
Docket
C-2009
Complaint
1971-08-17
Decision
1971-08-17
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Flammable Fabrics Act
Industry
wearing apparel
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; notice_to_customers; compliance_reporting; other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Paris Sales Company, 79 F.T.C. 226 (1971). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v079-0048

Report an error in this record (decision id v079-0048)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In toe Marter oF ALBERT MAGASIN trapine as PARIS SALES COMPANY CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS Docket C-2009. Complaint, Aug. 17, 1971—Decision, Aug. 17, 1971 Consent order requiring a Los Angeles, Calif., individual importing and distributing ladies’ and misses’ wearing apparei, including ladies’ scarves, to cease violating the Flammable Fabrics Act by importing and selling any fabric which fails to conform to the standards of said Act. : Complaint Pursuant to. the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Albert. Magasin, an individual trading and doing business as Paris Sales Company, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: Paracrarpy 1. Respondent Albert Magasin is an individual, trading and doing business under the name of Paris Sales Company, with his principal office and place of business located at 110 East 9th Street, Los Angeles, California.

Par. 2. Respondent is now, and for some time last past has been, engaged in the importation and distribution of ladies’ and misses’ wearing apparel, including, but not limited to, ladies’ scarves. Par. 3. Respondent is now and for some time last past has been engaged in the sale and offering for sale, in commerce, and has introduced, delivered for introduction, transported and caused to be transported in commerce, and has sold or delivered after sale or shipment in. commerce, products, as the terms “commerce,” and “preduct” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which products fail to conform to an applicable standard or regulation continued in effect, issued or amended under the provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended.

Among such products mentioned hereinabove were ladies’ and misses’ scarves.

226 Decision and Order Par. 4, The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent were and are in violation of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and as such constituted and now constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Decision AND OrpeEr The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption’ hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with acopy of a draft of complaint which the Los Angeles Regional Office: proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended; and ;

The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (80) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Albert Magasin is an individual, trading and doing business as Paris Sales Company. He is engaged in the importation and sale of women’s wearing apparel, including ladies’ scarves, with his office and principal place of business located at 110 East 9th Street, Los Angeles, California.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

Decision and Order 79 ¥F.T.C.

ORDER Lt is ordered, That the respondent, Albert Magasin, individually, and trading and doing business as Paris Sales Company, or any other name or names, and the respondent’s agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from selling, offering for sale, in commerce, or importing into the United States, or introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting or causing to be transported in commerce, or selling or delivering after sale or shipment in commerce, any product, fabric or related material; or selling or offering for sale, any product made of fabric or related material which has been shipped or received ‘in commerce as “commerce,” “product,” “fabric” and “related material” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which product, fabric, or related material fails to conform to an applicable standard or regulation issued, amended or continued in effect, under the provisions _of the aforesaid Act.

It is further ordered, That respondent notify all of his customers who have purchased or to whom have been delivered the products which gave rise to the complaint, of the flammable nature of said products, and effect the recall of said products from such customers. It is further ordered, That the respondent herein shall either process the products which gave rise to the complaint so as to bring them into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or destroy said products. It ts further ordered, That the respondent herein shall, within ten (10) days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a special report in writing setting forth the respondent’s intentions as to compliance with this order. This special report shall also advise the Commission fully and specifically concerning (1) the identity of the products which gave rise to the complaint, (2) the number of said products in inventory, (3) any action taken and any further actions proposed to be taken to notify customers of the flammability of said products and effect the recall of said products from customers, and of the results thereof, (4) any disposition of said products since August 27, 1970, and (5) any action taken or proposed to be taken to ‘bring said products into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or de- -stroy said products, and the results of such action. Such report shall further inform the Commission as to whether or not respondent has in ‘inventory any product, fabric, or related material having a plain ‘surface and made of paper, silk, rayon and acetate, nylon and acetate, srayon, cotton or any other material or combinations thereof in a weight 226 Complaint of two ounces or less per square yard, or any product, fabric, or related material having a raised fiber surface. Respondent shall submit samples of not less than one square yard in size of any such product, fabric, or related material with this report. It is further ordered, That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order.

← 79 F.T.C. 222 · 79 F.T.C. 229 →