Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., Inc

Volume 79 · 79 F.T.C. 635

Citation
79 F.T.C. 635
Docket
6534
Complaint
1956-03-22
Decision
1971-10-19
Document type
dismissal
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
raincoat manufacturing
Outcome
dismissed
Relief
set_aside
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., Inc, 79 F.T.C. 635 (1971). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v079-0117

Report an error in this record (decision id v079-0117)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In rar Matrer or ISRAEL RETTINGER, ET AL. porne BUSINESS AS RETTINGER RAINCOAT MFG. CO., INC.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 65384. Complaint, March 22, 1956—Decision Oct. 19, 1971 Order and decision reopening the proceeding as to two respondents, rescinding an order-to cease and desist (53 F.T.C. 182) as modified (75 ¥.1.0. 944), and dismissing the complaint.

Orver anp Decision Reorrninc Procrepine, Rescinpine ORbDER AND DismMissinG Complaint The Commission having issued an order to cease and desist, as modified by its order of May 27, 1969 [75 F.T.C. 944], against the respondents David Rettinger and Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., Inc., a corporation; and The Commission having issued its order to show cause why this proceeding should not be reopened for the purpose of rescinding its said order to cease and desist and dismissing its complaint; and The respondents not having responded to said Order To Show Cause within 80 days after service of said order on each of them; and The Commission, for the reasons set forth in its Order to Show Cause, being of the opinion that the public interest will best be served by reopening the proceedings herein, rescinding its order to cease and desist, and dismissing its complaint, hereby issues its order as follows: Zt is ordered, That this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened as to respondents named herein.

It is further ordered, That the Commission’s Order to Cease and Desist as modified by the Commission’s order of Mey 27, 1969, be, and it hereby is, rescinded as to the respondents Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., Inc., a New York corporation, and David Rettinger, individually and as a former copartner in Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., 2 partnership now dissolved, and as a former officer and active stockholder of Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co., Inc., a New York corporation, which corporation, is the successor and assign of said partnership, and that the complaint as to such respondents be, and it hereby is, dismissed without prejudice to the right of the Commission to take such further action as circumstances may warrant. Complaint . 79 F.T.C.

← 79 F.T.C. 629 · 79 F.T.C. 636 →