Consumer Law Library

Haddad Brothers, Inc., E al

Volume 82 · 82 F.T.C. 1069

Citation
82 F.T.C. 1069
Docket
C-2366
Decision
1973-03-20
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Flammable Fabrics Act
Industry
children's apparel manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting; notice_to_customers; recordkeeping
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labeling

Cite this decision

Haddad Brothers, Inc., E al, 82 F.T.C. 1069 (1973). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v082-0069

Report an error in this record (decision id v082-0069)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF HADDAD BROTHERS, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS - Docket. C-2366. Complaint, Mar. 20, 19783—Decision, Mar. 20, 1973. Consent order requiring a New York City manufacturer and seller of children’s garments, including but not limited to infant christening sets, among other things to cease manufacturing for sale, selling, importing, oy distributing any product, fabric, or related material which fails to conform to an applicable standard of flammability or regulation issued under the provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Haddad Brothers, Complaint 82 F.T.C.

Inc., a corporation, and Mac A. Haddad, Joseph A. Haddad, David A. Haddad and Sam A. Haddad, individually and as officers of the said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents have violated the provisions of the said Acts and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Haddad Brothers, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. Respondents Mac A. Haddad, Joseph A. Haddad, David A. Haddad and Sam A. Haddad are officers of the said corporate respondent. They formulate, direct and control the acts, practices and policies of the said corporation.

Respondents are engaged in the manufacture and sale of children’s garments, including but not limited to infant’s christening sets, with their office and principal place of business located at 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York. Par. 2. Respondents are now and for some time last past have been engaged in the manufacturing for sale, sale and offering for sale, in commerce, and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported and caused to be transported in commerce, and have sold or delivered after sale or shipment in commerce, products, as the terms “commerce” and “product,” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which products fail to conform to an applicable standard or regulation continued in effect, issued or amended under the provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended.

Among such products mentioned hereinabove were infant’s christening sets.

Par. 3. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents were and are in violation of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and as such constituted, and now constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

HADDAD BROTHERS, INC., ET AL. 1071 1069 Decision and Order DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Division of Textiles and Furs, Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Haddad Brothers, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York.

Respondents Mac A. Haddad, Joseph A. Haddad, David A. Haddad and Sam A. Haddad are officers of the corporate respondent. They formulate, direct and control the acts, practices and policies of the said corporation.

Respondents are engaged in the manufacture and sale of children’s garments, including but not limited to infant’s christening sets, with the office and principal place of business of respondents located at 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the sub- Decision and Order 82 F.T.C.

ject matter of the proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered, That respondent Haddad Brothers, Inc., a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, and respondents Mac A. Haddad, Joseph A. Haddad, David A. Haddad and Sam A. Haddad, individually and as officers of the said corporation and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device do forthwith cease and desist from manufacturing for sale, selling, offering for sale, in commerce, or importing into the United States, or introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting or causing to be transported in commerce, or selling or delivering after sale or shipment in commerce, any product, fabric, or related material; or manufacturing for sale, selling, or offering for sale, any product made of fabric or related material which has been shipped or received in commerce, as “commerce,” “product,” “fabric” and “related material” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which product, fabric or related material fails to conform to an applicable standard or regulation continued in effect, issued or amended under the provisions of the aforesaid Act. It ts further ordered, That respondents notify all of their customers who have purchased or to whom have been delivered the products which gave rise to this complaint, of the flammable nature of said products and effect the recall of said products from such customers.

It is further ordered, That the respondents herein either process the products which gave rise to the complaint so as to bring them into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or destroy said products.

It is further ordered, That respondents herein shall, within ten (10) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a special report in writing setting forth the ‘respondents’ intentions as to compliance with this order. This special report shall also advise the Commission fully and specifically concerning (1) the identity of the products which gave rise to the complaint, (2) the identity of the purchasers of said products, (3) the amount of said products on hand and in the HADDAD BKULHEKS, ING. BL AL. LUIS > 1069 Decision and Order channels of commerce, (4) any action taken and any further actions proposed to be taken to notify customers of the flammability of said products and effect the recall of said products from customers, and of the results thereof, (5) any disposition of said products since April 28, 1970, and (6) any action taken or proposed to be taken to bring said products into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or to destroy said products, and the results of such action. Such report shall further inform the - Commission as to whether or not respondents have in inventory any product, fabric, or related material having a plain surface and made of paper, silk, rayon and acetate, nylon and acetate, rayon, cotton or any other material or combinations thereof in a weight of two ounces or less per square yard, or any product, fabric or related material having a raised fiber surface. Respondents shall submit samples of not less than one square yard in size of any such product, fabric, or related material with this re-, port.

It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least 30 days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. _ It ts further ordered, That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions.

It is further ordered, That the individual respondents named herein promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of their present business or employment and of their affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondents’ current business or employment in which they are engaged as well as a description of their duties and responsibilities.

It is further ordered, That respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. Complaint 82 F.T.C.

← 82 F.T.C. 1065 · 82 F.T.C. 1074 →