Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Corning Glass Works

Volume 82 · 82 F.T.C. 1675

Citation
82 F.T.C. 1675
Docket
8874
Complaint
1972-01-13
Decision
1973-06-05
Document type
opinion
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
glass household products
Outcome
cease and desist
Relief
cease_and_desist
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

resale price maintenance

Cite this decision

Corning Glass Works, 82 F.T.C. 1675 (1973). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v082-0132

Report an error in this record (decision id v082-0132)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF CORNING GLASS WORKS ORDER, OPINION, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 8874. Complaint, January 13, 1972—Decision, June 5, 1978. Order and opinion requiring a Corning, New York manufacturer, advertiser, seller, and distributor of Pyrex, Corning Ware, and Corelle Livingware brands of glass household products for food preparation, serving, and storage, among other things in connection with any fair trade programs of those products, to cease illegal price-fixing and refusal-to-deal activities. The respondent is also required to abrogate Wholesaler Fair Trade Contracts where resale is in free trade jurisdictions, and to abrogate fair trade contracts with retailers in signer-only states which were obtained by wholesalers in free trade states subject to the illegal boycott provision. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Corning Glass Works, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has been and is now in violation of Section 5(a) (1) of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges as follows: COUNT I PARAGRAPH 1. Unless otherwise required by context, the follow- GREAT LAKES CARBON CORP. , ET AL. 1675 1529 Complaint IX.

It is further ordered That the provisions of this order shah not apply to any contract relating to the sale of petroleum coke pro­ duced at the refineries designated in the complaint when said coke is to be used as fuel substitute for coal, heating oil or natural gas. This order shah terminate and cease to be effective twenty years from the date of entry of this order.

Chairman Engman not participating.

← 82 F.T.C. 1529 · 82 F.T.C. 1675 →