Consumer Law Library

Charles Reynolds, Inc

Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 1471

Citation
83 F.T.C. 1471
Docket
C-2504
Complaint
1974-03-20
Decision
1974-03-20
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
hair replacement services
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
William P. McDonough. _
Respondent counsel
Pro se. 1472 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Charles Reynolds, Inc, 83 F.T.C. 1471 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0145

Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0145)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES REYNOLDS, INC., TRADING AS CHARLES REYNOLDS HAIR CENTER, ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2504. Complaint, Mar. 20, 1974—Decision, Mar. 20, 1974 Consent order requiring a Cambridge, Mass. promoter of a hair replacement “System,” among other things to cease misrepresenting that after application of its hair replacement “System,” the hair looks and can be cared for like natural hair, and can be eared for by the individual without professional or skilled assistance or additional costs. The order further requires clear and conspicuous disclosures involving surgical procedure, discomfort and pain, risk of infection, skin disease and scarring, continuing special care which may involve additional costs; prior consultation with a physician; and right of recission of contracts. ° Appearances For the Commission: William P. McDonough.

_ For the respondents: Pro se.

Complaint 83 F.T.C.

COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Charles Reynolds, Inc., a corporation, trading as Charles Reynolds Hair Center, and Raymond M. Paron, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Charles Reynolds, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Georgia with its principal office and place of business located at 89 First Street, Cambridge, Mass. . Respondent Raymond M. Paron is an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent. The aforementioned respondents cooperate and act together in carrying out the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. PAR. 2. Respondents operate the Charles Reynolds Hair Center and promote on their own behalf, among others, a hair replacement system (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “System”). The system involves a surgical procedure whereby a stainless steel thread, treated with teflon, is used to stitch from five to nine hollow metal cylinders or clips into the scalps of respondent’s customers. A mesh-type base to which wefts of hair have been sewn is then affixed to the cylinders or clips. Charles Reynolds Hair Center (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Center) sells, installs, and maintains the system, except that the surgical procedure itself is performed by a medical doctor. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business, respondents promote the system by advertising in newspapers of general circulation which are distributed across state lines, and by mailing promotional literature to prospective customers who respond to such advertising. As a result of such newspaper advertising, and literature mailing, respondents have maintained a substantial course of trade in commerce, as “commerce” .is used in Sections 5 and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and as a result of such newspaper advertising and mailing of promotional literature, have disseminated and caused to be disseminated false advertisements by United States mails, within the meaning of Section 12(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business, and for the CHARLES REYNOLDS HAIR CENTER, ET AL. 14738 1471 _ Complaint purpose of inducing the purchase of the hair replacement system, respondents, directly have made numerous statements and representations in advertisements inserted in newspapers of general circulation and in other promotional literature. Typical of the statements and representations contained in said advertisements and promotional literature, but not all inclusive, are the following: Quickly, simply, permanently! Safe, secure, permanent.

Comb it, brush it, tug it.

Medically tested, Medically perfected * * * Entirely new surgical! implant method.

Now in less than three hours you can have a full head of hair again. Swim, sleep, shower, towel dry. , Your second head of hair.

Think of it, in just 3 hours you can look your old self again. : You can treat your second head of hair just like your first! Brush it, comb: it, shampoo it, towel dry it and style it just like your very own. Written Guarantee - Bach is completely guaranteed upon completion to satisfy you or there’s absolutely no cost or obligation. Only Charles Reynolds offers a guarantee this comprehensive. PAR. 5. Through the use of the above advertisments, and others of similar import and meaning but not expressly set out herein, and by oral statements and representations made by employees and agents of the respondents, respondents have represented directly or by implication that:

1. The hairpiece applied has characteristics of natural hair, including the following:

(a) The same appearance as natural hair upon normal observation and upon extreme closeup examination.

(b) It may be cared for like natural hair, particularly in that actions such as washing, combing, brushing and shampooing may be performed on it in the same manner as might a person with natural hair. (c) The wearer may engage in physical activities with as much disregard for his hairpiece as might a person with natural hair. 2. After the system has been applied, the wearer can care for it himself, and will not have to seek professional or skilled assistance in maintaining the system, and that the customer will not ineur charges over and above the charge for installing the system. 3. Respondents’ products and the system are sold with a satisfaction guarantee; without condition or limitation for an indefinite period of time.

PAR. 6. In truth and in fact, 1. The hairpiece applied does not have the characteristics of natural hair. The system involves stainless steel teflon-coated sutures which are

CHARLES no tivuuew Complaint SUNDAY--HERALD“ADVERTIS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM LECHMERE SALES .

: PLENTY OF FREE PARKING” :

ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS ACCEPTED - Bo we OVO EVONCY OV GVO VOTE VOY =e ECIAL GET-ACQUAINTED OFFER “HAIR WEAVE TIGHTENING."

ONLY $16.00 ALSO INCLUDES: HAIRCUT, SHAMPOO. AND STYLE. pen of ot iapetant, ER, MAY: 20,° P ° Perhaps you presently wear a:hairpiece, “ Halrweave, or‘ havea ‘surgical implant.

°. Maybe you're “just: thinking about-one:i you are, then. YOU Owe IT TO:YOURi SELF 10, Call us today: Why? Because “Charles Reynolds has just:developed the ¥ new Surgical Implant ‘and: Mistrand 5 1 15 1 8 2 1558 1069 63 17 49.143330 jethiod®5 1 15 1 8 3 1627 1069 88 22 91.505280 Medically5 1 15 1 8 4 1720 1069 61 22 95.061089 tested;5 1 15 1 8 5 1787 1066 87 20 75.947609 medically,5 1 15 1 8 6 1879 1073 36 14 79.705498 per-4 1 15 1 9 0 1539 1091 395 23 -1 5 1 15 1 9 1 1539 1094 57 16 20.736923 fected:5 1 15 1 9 2 1607 1092 41 17 31.509865 ands 1 15 1 9 3 1652 1092 87 22 72.548759 ‘medically,5 1 15 1 9 4 1748 1089 112 25 32.670891 apphed,it's5 1 15 1 9 5 1872 1091 48 17 66.300385 sate.5 1 15 1 9 6 1932 1110 2 3 22.136070 ¥4 1 15 1 10 0 1522 1113 393 23 -1 5 1 15 1 10 1 1522 1113 12 16 39.747932 #5 1 15 1 10 2 1539 1118 101 16 45.910156 securé.ands 1 15 1 10 3 1647 1119 109 17 68.984413 permanent;5 1 15 1 10 4 1761 1112 85 20 95.257309 Available5 1 15 1 10 5 1853 1116 39 18 95.413239 only5 1 15 1 10 6 1900 1118 15 14 96.669601 at4 1 15 1 11 0 1539 1138 377 21 -1 5 1 15 1 11 1 1539 1140 74 23 14.297211 Charles5 1 15 1 11 2 1612 1141 93 21 0.000000 ‘Reynolds5 1 15 1 11 3 1714 1139 60 16 55.373184 Studio:5 1 15 1 11 4 1784 1139 32 20 55.373184 For5 1 15 1 11 5 1827 1138 89 22 15.205627 'Men:For.4 1 15 1 12 0 1539 1153 377 36 -1 5 1 15 1 12 1 1539 1161 64 26 86.249413 quality,5 1 15 1 12 2 1610 1162 155 25 23.621651 ‘appearance:ands 1 15 1 12 3 1771 1153 64 36 33.041527 ‘sataty,5 1 15 1 12 4 1847 1158 29 20 31.694122 no5 1 15 1 12 5 1882 1162 34 15 31.694122 “hair4 1 15 1 13 0 1540 1181 401 35 -1 5 1 15 1 13 1 1540 1181 115 35 95.068306 replacements 1 15 1 13 2 1660 1187 72 17 71.933113 methods 1 15 1 13 3 1738 1183 52 22 96.046959 today5 1 15 1 13 4 1797 1190 89 14 94.957520 measures5 1 15 1 13 5 1894 1190 23 18 0.000000 up4 1 15 1 14 0 1516 1206 408 24 -1 5 1 15 1 14 1 1516 1215 43 12 52.153862 to5 1 15 1 14 2 1566 1212 29 15 94.038971 thes 1 15 1 14 3 1603 1210 66 17 80.642670 all-news 1 15 1 14 4 1676 1211 76 19 80.596375 Surgical5 1 15 1 14 5 1762 1207 113 21 0.000000 Impiant’and'5 1 15 1 14 6 1883 1205 41 19 52.523769 Mil:4 1 15 1 15 0 1528 1232 413 21 -1 5 1 15 1 15 1 1528 1235 70 16 0.000000 Strands 1 15 1 15 2 1605 1233 81 18 89.002937 Method?5 1 15 1 15 3 1695 1234 34 16 14.311516 Gets 1 15 1 15 4 1736 1235 28 14 96.008224 thes 1 15 1 15 5 1772 1233 48 19 83.096237 story5 1 15 1 15 6 1828 1230 89 23 13.771591 firsthand4 1 15 1 16 0 1541 1253 376 41 -1 5 1 15 1 16 1 1541 1272 3 3 0.000000 .5 1 15 1 16 2 1566 1254 50 36 82.881752 from:5 1 15 1 16 3 1619 1259 69 25 85.147011 Charles5 1 15 1 16 4 1697 1253 82 41 0.000000 Reynolds5 1 15 1 16 5 1790 1253 35 37 76.879410 ‘ands 1 15 1 16 6 1831 1257 50 18 0.000000 Athens 1 15 1 16 7 1884 1260 33 15 0.000000 ‘you2 1 16 0 0 0 1626 1297 199 19 -1 3 1 16 1 0 0 1626 1297 199 19 -1 4 1 16 1 1 0 1626 1297 199 19 -1 5 1 16 1 1 1 1626 1297 199 19 95.000000 2 1 17 0 0 0 1656 1332 89 10 -1 3 1 17 1 0 0 1656 1332 89 10 -1 4 1 17 1 1 0 1656 1332 89 10 -1 5 1 17 1 1 1 1656 1332 89 10 95.000000 2 1 18 0 0 0 1703 1302 5 80 -1 3 1 18 1 0 0 1703 1302 5 80 -1 4 1 18 1 1 0 1703 1302 5 80 -1 5 1 18 1 1 1 1703 1302 5 80 95.000000 2 1 19 0 0 0 1619 1358 137 14 -1 3 1 19 1 0 0 1619 1358 137 14 -1 4 1 19 1 1 0 1619 1358 137 14 -1 5 1 19 1 1 1 1619 1358 137 14 95.000000 2 1 20 0 0 0 1663 1303 6 97 -1 3 1 20 1 0 0 1663 1303 6 97 -1 4 1 20 1 1 0 1663 1303 6 97 -1 5 1 20 1 1 1 1663 1303 6 97 95.000000 2 1 21 0 0 0 1514 1479 402 72 -1 3 1 21 1 0 0 1539 1479 377 67 -1 4 1 21 1 1 0 1690 1479 64 21 -1 5 1 21 1 1 1 1674 1481 36 20 82.211990 olutely5 1 21 1 1 2 1740 1475 14 35 0.000000 '0)4 1 21 1 2 0 1534 1498 382 36 -1 5 1 21 1 2 1 1534 1503 53 27 6.922562 stones 1 21 1 2 2 1599 1498 52 36 0.000000 Oniy5 1 21 1 2 3 1651 1496 70 22 63.639549 Charles.5 1 21 1 2 4 1736 1498 87 23 62.011848 Reynolds5 1 21 1 2 5 1836 1500 66 20 23.621994 -offers5 1 21 1 2 6 1907 1505 9 11 23.621994 .a4 1 21 1 3 0 1514 1516 355 35 -1 5 1 21 1 3 1 1514 1516 125 35 13.130302 guarantee this ‘comprehensive...

ALL OR VISIT FOR FREE INFORMATION.

OPEM WEOMESOAY AND FRIGAY EVENINGS. UNTIL PM : PLENTY oF FREE PARONG.

“SEND FOR FREE BROCHURE JODAY p= malt —— cnarnres. reunolds ‘naircenter .- 89 First Street, Cambridge, Mass,'02141 Please ‘send.me information ina plain white envelope. ere Name... i Address City.

t DAPE Ti vve BA-5:70 Complaint 83 F.T.C.

stitched into the scalp by a surgical procedure and which may be rejected by the body. The hairpiece differs from natural hair in many respects, including the following:

(a) It does not have the same appearance as 5 natural hair in a substantial number of instances. It is often discernible as a hairpiece or toupee upon normal observation, and upon extreme close-up examination. (b) It cannot be cared for like regular hair, but requires special care and handling. Strong pulling on the hair, such as may be expected to occur in washing, combing, brushing, and shampooing, can cause pain because of the pressure exerted on the sutures in the scalp, may cause bleeding, and may cause the sutures to pull out. As a consequence, washing the hair and scalp requires extra care. Unless extra care is taken while washing the hair and scalp, foreign particles and dead skin tissue may accumulate beneath the base and become a significant source of irritation. The hair styles into which the hairpiece may be combed or brushed without professional treatments are limited. (c) The wearer may not engage in physical activities with as much disregard for his hairpiece as might a person with natural hair. The ' wearer must at all times be careful that the hair does not pull or get pulled, or become tangled, or strained. Discomfort and pain may be caused by common actions, such as rolling the head on a pillow during sleep.

2. The wearer cannot in most instances care for the hairpiece himself; he must seek professional or skilled assistance on many occasions. Medical problems associated with the surgical procedure, or the continuing presence of stainless steel thread in the scalp, may require subsequent visits to a medical doctor. Wearers having some natural hair under the hair applied by respondents would have to have a haircut at regular intervals and such hair would be difficult to cut without. skilled assistance. A substantial additional charge for services would be incurred. Respondents’ applied hair is subject to bleaching in sunlight and other discoloration normally associated with hairpieces, and where the hairpiece has been color-dyed, loss of dye through washing and normal wear; thus, replacement wefts of hair or hairpieces are required at intervals in order to maintain a color match with any natural hair the wearer may have. Because of the difficulty in washing the hair and scalp described previously in Paragraph Six, assistance is often required to | wash the hair. ;

3. Respondents’ products and the system are not guaranteed without condition or limitation for an indefinite period of time. Such guarantee as may be provided is subject to numerous terms, conditions, and limitations and it fails to set forth the real nature and extent of the CHARLES REYNOLDS HAIR CENTER, ET AL. 1477 1471 Complaint guarantee and the manner in which the guarantor will perform thereunder.

The statements and representations set forth in Paragraphs Four and Five were and are false, misleading and deceptive. PAR. 7. In the course and conduct of their‘business, respondents, have represented in advertisements the asserted advantages of their system, as hereinbefore described. In no case have respondents’ newspaper advertisements disclosed:

(a) That clients may experience discomfort and pain as a result of the surgical procedure, from the teflon-coated stainless steel sutures themselves, and from pulling normally incident to wearing the hairpiece; (b) That clients will be subject to the risk of irritation, infections and skin diseases as a result of the surgical procedure and as a result of the stainless steel thread remaining in the scalp; and ; (c) That permanent scarring to the scalp may result from the required surgical procedures, and as a result of the stainless steel thread remaining in the scalp.

The consequences described in this paragraph have in fact occurred, and to a reasonable medical certainty can be expected to occur, and respondents knew, and had reason to know, that they could be expected to occur. Furthermore, the surgical procedure has not been used in conjunction with respondents’ system for a sufficient experimental period to determine the extent of seriousness of the above side effects, and whether there are any other side effects, including, but not limited to, rejection of the teflon-coated stainless steel thread through the human body’s natural rejection process.

Therefore, the advertisements referred to in Paragraph Seven are false and misleading and the acts and practices referred to in said paragraph are unfair and deceptive.

PAR. 8. For the purpose of inducing the purchase of their hair replacement system, respondents entice members of the purchasing public to their center with advertisements, such as, “Your second Head of Hair,” as a solution to baldness and like advertisements to attract members of the purchasing public concerned about their hair loss, and with offers of free information without any obligations. In most cases respondents do not disclose details of their system unless and ‘until a prospect visits their center. When members of the purchasing public have visited the center, they have been subjected to sales pressure, for the purpose of persuading them to sign a contract for the application of the system, and to,make a substantial down payment, without being afforded a reasonable opportunity to consider and comprehend the scope and extent of the contractual obligations involved, the seriousness of the surgical procedure and the possibilities of discomfort, pain, dis- Decision and Order 83 F.T.C.

ease, or disfigurement related to the continued presence of the stainless steel thread in the scalp. Persons are urged to sign such contracts and make such down payments, through the use of sales presentations employing the following practice, among others: Inducing prospects to sign contracts and/or make downpayments before they have consulted a medical doctor and freely and openly discussed with such doctor the medical risks and consequences of the surgical procedure, and of the stainless steel thread being embedded in their scalp.

Such consultations typically occur immediately before the commencement of surgery, by which time the client is likely to feel pressured to go through with the application. ; Therefore, the advertisements referred to in Paragraph Eight were and are false and misleading, and the acts and practices set forth in such paragraph were and are false and deceptive. PAR. 9. In the course and conduct of their business, and at all times mentioned herein, respondents have been and are in substantial competition in commerce with corporations, firms, and individuals, in the sale of cosmetics, devices and treatments for the concealment of baldness. PAR. 10. The use by respondents of the above unfair and deceptive representations and practices has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to mislead consumers, without affording them reasonable opportunity to consider and comprehend the scope and extent of the contractual obligations involved, or the seriousness of the surgical procedure, and the possibilities of discomfort, pain, disease or disfigurement related thereto, and related to the continual presence of the teflon-coated stainless steel thread in the scalp, or to compare prices, techniques, and devices available from competing corporations, firms, and individuals selling baldness concealment cosmetics, devices, and treatments to the purchasing public. | PAR. 11. The respondents’ acts and practices alleged herein are to the prejudice and injury of the purchasing public, and to respondents’ competitors, and constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and false advertise ments disseminated by United States mails, and in commerce, in violation of Section 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Boston Regional Office proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued CHARLES REYNOLDS HAIR CENTER, ET AL. 1479 1471 Decision and Order :

by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Charles Reynolds, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Georgia with its office and principal place of business located at 89 First Street, Cambridge, Mass.

Respondent Raymond M. Paron is an officer of said corporation. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of said corporation, and his principal office and place of business is located at the above-stated address.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered, That respondents Charles Reynolds, Inc., a corporation, trading as Charles Reynolds Hair Center or under any other trade name or names, its successors and assigns, and Raymond M. Paron, individually and as an officer of said corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “respondents”), and respondents’ officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any hair replacement product or process involving surgical implants (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the “System”), in commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, or by the United States mails within the mean- Decision and Order 83 F.T.C.

ing of Section 12(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing, directly or by implication: 1. That after the system has been applied, the hair applied has the following characteristics of natural hair; a. The same appearance in all applications as natural hair, upon normal observation, and upon extreme close-up examination;

b. It may be cared for like natural hair where such care involves possible pulling on the hair;

c. The wearer may engage in physical activity and movement with the same disregard for his hair as he would if he had natural hair. :

2. That after the system has been applied, the wearer can care for it himself, and will not have the seek professional or skilled assistance in maintaining the system, and that the customer will . not incur maintenance costs over and above the cost of applying the system.

3. That respondents’ products and the system are guaranteed unless the nature, extent and duration of the guarantee, the idenity of the guarantor and the manner in which the guarantor will perform thereunder are clearly and conspicuously disclosed; and unless respondents promptly and fully perform all of their obligations and requirements, directly or impliedly represented, under the terms of each such guarantee.

It is further ordered, That respondents, in advertising and in all oral sales presentations, offering for sale, selling or distributing the system, disclose clearly and conspicuously that:

1. The system involves a surgical procedure resulting in the implantation of stainless steel sutures in the scalp, to which hair is affixed.

' 2. By virtue of the surgical procedure involving implantation of teflon coated stainless steel sutures in the scalp, and by virtue of the teflon coated stainless steel sutures remaining in the scalp, there is a high probability of discomfort and pain, and a risk of infection, skin disease and scarring.

3. The system has been in use for too short a period of time to determine to a reasonable medical certainty the extent or seriousness of the above-described side effects, or whether there are other side effects.

4. Continuing special care of the system is necessary to minimize the probabilities and risks referred to in Subparagraph Two of the paragraph, and such care may involve additional costs for medications and assistance.

CHARLES REYNOLDS HAIR CENTER, ET AL. 1481 1471 Decision and Order 5. The purchaser is advised to consult with his personal physician about the implant process before deciding whether to purchase it.

Respondents shall set forth the above disclosures separately and conspicuously from the balance of each advertisement or presentation used in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale or distribution of the system, and shall devote no less than 15 percent of each advertisement or presentation to such disclosures. Provided however, That in advertisements which consist of less than ten column inches in newspapers or periodicals, and in radio or television advertisements with a running time of one minute or less, respondents may substitute the following statement, in lieu of the above requirements:

Warning: This application involves surgery whereby stainless steel sutures are placed in the scalp. Discomfort, pain, and medical problems may occur. Continuing cafe is necessary. Consult your own physician.

No less than 15 percent of such advertisements shall be devoted to this disclosure, such disclosure shall be set forth clearly and conspicuously from the balance of each of such advertisements, and if such disclosure is in a newspaper or periodical, it shall be in at least eleven point type.

It is further ordered, That respondents provide prospective purchasers with a separate disclosure sheet containing the information required in the immediately preceding paragraph of this order, Subparagraphs One through Five, thereof, and that respondents require that such prospective purchasers, subsequent to receipt of such disclosure sheet, consult with a duly licensed physician who is not associated, directly or indirectly, financially or otherwise, with the respondents regarding the nature of the surgery to be done, the probabilities of discomfort and pain, and risks of infection, skin disease and scarring. It is further ordered, That no contract for application of respondents’ system shall become binding on the purchaser prior to midnight of the third day, excluding Sundays and legal holidays, after the day of the purchasers’s above-described consultation with a duly licensed physician who is not associated, directly or indirectly, financially or otherwise, with the respondents, or after the day on which said contract for application of the system was executed, whichever day is later, and that:

1. Respondents shall clearly and conspicuously disclose, orally prior to the time of sale, and in writing on any contract, promissory note or other instrument, executed by the purchaser in connection with the sale of the system, that the purchaser may rescind or cancel any obligation incurred, by mailing or delivering a notice of Decision and Order 83 F.T.C.

cancellation to the office responsible for the sale prior to - midnight of the third day, excluding Sundays and legal holidays, after the day of the purchaser’s above-described consultation with a duly licensed physician or after the day on which said contract for application of the system was executed, whichever day is later. 2. Respondents shall provide a separate and clearly understandable form which the purchaser may use as a notice of cancellation. 3. Respondents shall not negotiate any contract, promissory note, or other instrument of indebtedness to a finance company or other third party prior to midnight of the fifth day, excluding Sundays and legal holidays, after the day of the purchaser’s above-described consultation with a duly licensed: physician, or after the day on which said contract for application of the system was executed, whichever day is later.

4. Respondents shall obtain from each purchaser a certificate signed by the physician who was consulted as required by this “order, such certificate specifying that the said physician has explained to the purchaser the nature of the surgery to be done, and has advised him of the probabilities of discomfort and pain, and risks of infection, skin disease and scarring, and specifying the date and approximate time of the consultation; and respondents shall retain all such certificates for three years. Itis further ordered, That respondents serve a copy of this order upon each physician participating in application of respondents’ system, and obtain written acknowledgement of the receipt thereof. Respondents shall retain such acknowledgements for so long as such persons continue to participate in the application of respondents’ system. It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent, such as dissolution, assignment, or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, licensees, or franchisees, or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. It is further ordered, That in the event that the corporate respondent merges with another corporation or transfers all or a substantial part of its business or assets to any other corporation or to any other person, said respondent shall require such successor or transferee to file promptly with the Commission a written agreement to be bound by the terms of this order; Provided, That if said respondent wishes to present to the Commission any reasons why said order should not apply in its present form to said successor or transferee, it shall submit to the Commission a written statement setting forth said reasons prior to the consummation of said succession or transfer.

← 83 F.T.C. 1467 · 83 F.T.C. 1491 →