Frozen Food Forum, Inc

Volume 84 · 84 F.T.C. 221

Citation: 84 F.T.C. 221
Docket: 8890
Decision: 1974-08-05
Document type: interlocutory order
Case type: procedural
Outcome: other
Commission counsel: William E. Mumford, Lewis F. Parker, Joel S. Thwaites, Ronald C. Cougill and Charles C. Murphy, Jr
Respondent counsel: Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, Ga. and W. A. Bentley, Chickering & Gregory, San Francisco, Calif. In view of the Commission’s request to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to dismiss the subpoena enforcement proceeding against respondents, with the result that the evidence called for by the subpoenas will not be produced, the Commis- sion has determined to consider whether to dismiss this proceeding: Accordingly, It is ordered, That complaint counsel shall within thirty (30) days from the date of this order serve and file a brief (not to exceed
Source: Original volume PDF
Original PDF: This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Frozen Food Forum, Inc, 84 F.T.C. 221 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v084-0017

Report an error in this record (decision id v084-0017)

Order status: dismissed_no_order. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF FROZEN FOOD FORUM, INC., ET AL.

Docket 8890. Interlocutory Order, Aug. 5. 1974 Order establishing periods of time for filing and length of briefs by counsel supporting the complaint and respondent respectively, on the question of whether, in view of the unavailability of evidence, this proceeding should be dismissed. Appearances For the Commission: William E. Mumford, Lewis F. Parker, Joel S. Thwaites, Ronald C. Cougill and Charles C. Murphy, Jr. For the respondents: Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, Ga. and W. A. Bentley, Chickering & Gregory, San Francisco, Calif. In view of the Commission’s request to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to dismiss the subpoena enforcement proceeding against respondents, with the result that the evidence called for by the subpoenas will not be produced, the Commission has determined to consider whether to dismiss this proceeding: Accordingly, It is ordered, That complaint counsel shall within thirty (30) days from the date of this order serve and file a brief (not to exceed fifty (50) pages) with the Commission limited to the following question: whether, in view of the unavailability of evidence, this proceeding should be dismissed. Upon receipt of complaint counsel’s brief, respondents may within twenty (20) days serve and file a reply brief (not to exceed (50) pages) limited to the same question. Complaint 84 F.T.C.

← 84 F.T.C. 215 · 84 F.T.C. 222 →