Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Hugh Mooney

Volume 85 · 85 F.T.C. 507

Citation
85 F.T.C. 507
Docket
C-2645
Complaint
1975-03-06
Decision
1975-03-06
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
Cosmetics
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Jean F. Greene and Mark A. Heller
Respondent counsel
Cha' rles B. Chernofsky, Pearl River, N
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Hugh Mooney, 85 F.T.C. 507 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v085-0061

Report an error in this record (decision id v085-0061)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF HUGH MOONEY T/A ORGANIC MASQUE CO.

CONSENT, ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2645. Complaint, Mar. , 1.975 - Deci.qion, Mar. , 1975 Consent order requiring a Greenwich, Conn., seHer and distributor of a skin preparation known as Organic Masque, among other things to cease making false performance and effectiveness claims and misrepresenting the extent to which the product has been tested or the results of its use demonstrated. Appearances For the Commission: Jean F. Greene and Mark A. Heller. For the respondent: Cha' rules B. Chernofsky, Pearl River, N. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Hugh Mooney, individually and doing business as Organic Masque Co., hereinafter SOH FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint Hi) F.T. referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a pro ecding by it in respect thereof would he in the public interest, hereby issues this complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Hugh Mooney is an individual trading and doing business as Organic Masque Co., with his principal place of business at 28:3 Greenwich Ave., Greenwich, Conn. PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and for some time past has been, engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution of a skin preparation known as Organic Masque.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of his aforesaid business respondent now causes, and for some time last past has caused his said skin preparation, when sold, to be shipped from his place,cof business in the State of Connecticut to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States, and maintains and at all times mentioned herein, has maintained, a substantial course of trade in said prod-ucts in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of his aforesaid business respondent has disseminated, and is now disseminating, and has caused and is now causing the dissemination of false advertisements concerning the said product by the United States mails and by various other means in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act; and respondent has also disseminated and is now disseminating, and has caused and is now causing the dissemination of false advertising oncerning the said product by various means for the purpose of inducing and which are likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of the said product in commerce, as commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 5. In the course and conduct of his aforesaid business respondent has made, and is now making, numerous statements and representations in magazines, and elsewhere with respect to the ability of the said product to cleanse and cure blemished skin. Typical and ilustrative of the statements and representations contained in said advertising and promotional material, but not all inclusive thereof, is the following:

The most fabulous new cosmetic development in years! An incredible new organic face mask that really works * * * that really draws blackheads, hardened oils, tiny facial hairs and imbedded dirt right out of your pores safely, quiekly, easily, at once, right before your eyes! * * * in about fifteen minutes or so Organic Masque become firm and dry to the touch * * * look closely and you ll see blackheads, bits of hardened oil, imbedrled dirt old make-up, even facial hairs glued firmly to that mask * * *! 507 Complaint This has to be the most fantastic cosmetic product you ever used in your life because you see it work immediately.

PAR. 6. By and through the use of said statemcnts and representations made by respondent in his advertising and promotional materials respondent is representing and has represented, directly or by implication, that:

1. Organic Masque is a revolutionary development in facial masks; 2. The use of Organic Masque wil immediately remove all blackheads and unclog all porcs for each individual who uses thc product;

3. Organic Masque wil produce blcmish-free skin on every individual who uses it;

4. Tests or demonstrations which prove the representations numbered 1 , and :1 above have been conducted. PAR. 7. In truth and in fact:

1. Organic Masque is not a revolutionary development in facial masks;

2. The use of Organic Masque wil not immediately remove all blackheads and unclog all porcs for each individual who uses thc product;

3. Organic Masque wil not produce blcmish-free skin on every individual who uses it;

4. Tests or demonstrations which prove the representations numbered 1 , and a above have not been conducted. PAR. 8. In the course and conduct of his business as aforesaid, and at all times mentioned herein, respondent has been in substantial competition in commerce with corporations, firms, and individuals in the sale of skin preparations.

PAR. 9. The use by respondent of the aforesaid false, misle'iding and deceptive statements and representations has had, and now has, the tendency and capacity to mislead members of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondent's skin preparation by reason of said erroneous and mistaken belief.

PAR. 10. The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondent, as herein alleged, were and are to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondent's competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of Sections 5 and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Decision and Order 85 F. DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the bureau proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of such agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34 of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Hugh Mooney is an individual, trading and doing business as Organic Masque Co., with principal place of business at 28a Greenwich Ave., Greenwich, Conn.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondent Hugh Mooney, individually and trading and doing business under the name Organic Masque Co., or under any other name, and his successors, assigns, representatives agents, and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale or distribution of skin preparations or any other product in commerce, as commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwithA. Representing,cease and desistdirectlyfrom:or by implication that: HUGH MOONEY lla ORGANIC MASQUE CO. 511 507 Decision and Order 1. Any such product is a new or revolutionary development; 2. Any such product removes blackheads or wil unclog pores, or that the use of any such product produces or helps to produce clear or blcmish-free skin;

3. Has any quality, characteristics, or capacity, or wil have any result, or wil perform in any given manner, or is effective for any purpose, unless each such quality, characteristic, capacity, result manner of performance, or effectiveness has been fully substantiated by competent and reliable scientific testing. B. Disseminating or causing the dissemination of any advertising by United States mails or by any means in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, which misrepresents directly or by implication:

1. The performance, efficacy, capacity, or usefulness, or any characteristic, property, quality, or the result of use of any such product.

2. The extent to which any such product has been tested, or the results of its use demonstrated.

C. Disseminating or causing the dissemination of any advertisement by any means, for the purpose of inducing or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of any such product, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, which contains any of the representations, acts or practices prohibited in Paragraphs A or B above.

It is further ordered That the respondent promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his present business or employment and of his affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondent's current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which he is engaged as well as a description of his duties and responsibilties. It is further ordered That the respondent shall within sixty (60) days and at the end of six (6) months after the effective date of the order served upon him file with the Commission a report, in writing, signed by respondent, setting forth in detail the manner and form of his compliance will1 the order to cease and desist. 512 FF.DJoRAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 85 F.

← 85 F.T.C. 507 · 85 F.T.C. 512 →