Consumer Law Library

Mark Enterprises, Inc

Volume 85 · 85 F.T.C. 1068

Citation
85 F.T.C. 1068
Docket
8984
Complaint
1974-07-29
Decision
1975-06-17
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
home improvement
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting
Order term (years)
3
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

bait and switchdeceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

Mark Enterprises, Inc, 85 F.T.C. 1068 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v085-0126

Report an error in this record (decision id v085-0126)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN Tile MATTER OF MARK ENTERPRISES, JNC., E'1 AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMSSION ACT Dockd 8.98.4. Complaint, July 1.974-Deci:;;ion, June, 1975 Consent order requiring- a Kansas City, Mo., seller and installer of residential, abovethe-ground swimming pools and other home improvement products, among other things to cease using bait and switch tactics and other deceptive sellng practices- 1068 Complaint Appearanccs For the Commission; F. Kelly Smith, Jr. For the respondents; William B. Miller Kansas City, Mo., and Peabody, Revlin, Lambert Dennison Wash., D. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commssion Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Mark Enterprises Inc., a corporation, also doing business as Marc Enterprises, Inc., and Paul K Cassidy, individually and as an offcer of said corporation hereinafter sometimes ref cited to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commssion that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Mark Enterprises, Inc., also doing business as Marc Enterprises, Inc., is a corporation org-aned, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal offce and place of business located at 8025 Main in the city of Kansas City, State of Mo. Respondent Paul K Cassidy is an individual and offcer of said corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His business address is the same as that of the corporate respondent.

PAR. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution to the public of products including, but not limited to, residential above ground swimming pools, and in the installation thereof. P AR. : . In the course and conduct of their busines", as aforesaid respondents now cause, and for some time last past have caused, their products, when sold, to be shipped from their place of business in the State of Missouri to purchasers thereof located in varous other states of the United States, and maintain, and at all times mentioned herein have maintained, a substantial course of trae in said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federdl Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business and for the purose of inducing the purchase and instalation of their residential above ground swimming pools, respondents and their salesmen or representatives have made, and are now making, numerous statements and representations in advertising and promotional material and Complaint R5 F.

through oral statements and representations with respect to the nature and limitations of their offers, their prices and their purchasers savmgs.

Typical and illustrative of said statements and representations, but not all inclusive thereof, are the following; MARC SAYS, mUNG THE COUNTRY CLUB HOME Rig Pool-- Big Savings! SUN_, MON., TUBES.

ONLY OFFER LIMITED CALL NOW NOW ONLY $649 Installed SAVE an extra $50 Now! THE RIVERIA" (sic) 31 feet x 16 feet Outside Dimensions 15 feet x 24 feet Swim Area 4 feet Deep P AR- 5- By and through the use of the aforesaid statcmcnts and representations and others of similar import and meaning, but not specifically set out herein, separately and in connection with oral statements and representations of their salesmen or representatives respondents have represented, and arc now representing, directly or by implication, that:

L The offers set out in their advertisements are bona fide offers to sell swimming pools and their installations of thc kind therein described at the prices and on the terms stated.

2. Their offer of a 31' x 16' outside dimcnsion swimmng pool for $649 is for a limited period of only three days. 8. Their swimming pools and installations arc being offered for sale at special or reduced prices, and savings are thereby afforded to their purchasers because of reductions from respondents' reglar selling pnce.

1068 Complaint swimming pools is complete for the 4. Installation of their advertised price and no other installation work nceds to be done. 5. After the installation of their product is complete, the homes of their purchasers will be used for demonstration and advertising puroses by respondents and, as a result of allowing their homes to be used as models, purchasers will be. granted reduced prices or will receive allowances or discounts.

PAR. 6. In truth and in fact:

1. The offers set out in respondents' advertisements are not bona fide offers to sell swimming pools and their installations of the kind therein described at the prices or on the terms and conditions stated but are made for purpose of obtaining leads to persons interested in the purchase thereof. After obtaining such leads, respondents' salesmen or representatives call upon such persons and disparage respondents advertised s\\ mming pools and their installations and "therwse discourage the purchase thereof and attempt to sell and frequently do sell different and more expensive swimming pools and installations. 2. Respondents' advertised offer of a 81' x 16' outside dimension swimming pool for $649 is not made for a limited period of time. Said product is regularly advertised for the represented price or at another so called reduced price over a period of time greater than the represented limitations.

8. Respondents' swimming pools and installations are not being offered for sale at special or reduced prices, and savings are not thereby afforded to their purcbasers because of reductions from respondents' regular selling prices. In fact, respondents do not have regular selling prices for particular advertised swimmng pools, but the prices at which said swimmig pools are offered for sale vary from purchaser to purchaser and from month to month. 4. Installation of respondents' swimmng pools is not complete for the advertised price. In fact, purchasers are often required to provide some steps in the installation process themselves. 5. After installation of respondents' swimming pools is completed the homes of respondents' purchasers will not, in most instances, be used for demonstration or advertising purposes by respondents and as a result of allowing, or agreeing to allow their homes to be used as models, purchasers are not granted reduced prices, nor do they receive allowances or discounts of any type.

Therefore, the statements and representations, as set forth in Paragraphs Four and Five hereof, were, and are, false, misleading and deceptive.

PAR. 7. In the course and conduct of their aforesaid business, and at all times mentioned herein, respondents have been, and now are, in _ Decision and Order 85 F. substantial competition, in commerce, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of residential above ground swimming pools of the same general kind and nature as those sold by respondents. PAR. 8. The use of the respondents of the aforesaid false, misleading and deceptive statements, representations and practices has had, and now .has, the capacity and tendency to mislead members of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondents' swimming pools and installations by reason of said erroneous and mistaken belief. PAR. 9. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents as herein alleged, were and are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondents' competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfai methods of competition in commerce and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce in violation of Section 5 of the FesJcral Trade Commission Act.

DECISION AND ORm;R The Federal Trade Commission having issued its complaint against the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been served with notice of the Commission s complaint charging them with violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commssion Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containig a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signng of said agreement is for settement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having decided to withdraw the matter from adjudication, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, and having duly considered the comments fied thereafter pursuant Section 2.84(b) of its rules, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.84(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Mark Enterprises, Inc., also doing business as Marc Enterprises, Inc., is a corpration organid, existing and doingbusiness under and by viue of the laws of the State of Missouri, with MARK ENTERPRISES, INC. 1073 106 Decision and Order its office and principal place of business located at 8025 Main, City of Kansas City, State of Missour.

Respondent Paul K. Cassidy is an officer of said corporation. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of said corporation, and his principal office and place of business is located at , the abbve stated address.

2. The Federal Trade Commssion bas jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That Mark Enterprises, Inc., a corporation, also doing its business as Marc Enterprises, Inc., or under any other name, successors and assigns, and Paul K. Cassidy, individually and as an officer of said corporation, and respondents' offcers, agents, representatives and employees directly or through any corporation, subsidiar, division or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale, distribution or installation of residential above-ground swimming pools, or any other home improvement products and services at retail in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Using, in any manner, a sales plan, scheme or device wherein false, misleading or deceptive statements or representations are made in order to obtain leads or prospects for the sale of other products installations or servces.

2. Making representations purporting to offer borne improvement products, installations or services at retail when the purose of such representations are not to sell the offered products, installations or servces but to obtain leads or prospects for the sale of other such products, installations or servces at higher prices. 8. Discouragig the purchase of any swimming pool or other home improvement product, installation or servce at retail by failing to deliver as contractually obJig',;ted or disparging any product, instalation or servce which is advertised or offered for sale by respondents. 4. Representing, directly or by implication, that any home improvement product, installation or servce at retail is offered for sale by respondents when such offer is not a bona fide offer to sell such product, installation or service.

5. Representing, directly or by implication, that any of respondents offers to sell home improvement products, installations or services at retail are limited as to time or restricted or limited in any other manner, unless such represented limitations or restrictions are actualy in force and in good faith adhered to.

, Decision and Order R5 F.T.C. 6. Representing, directly or by implication, that any price for respondents' home improvement products, installations or services at retail is a special or reduced- price lmless such price constitutes a signifcant reduction from an established selling price at which such products, installations or services have been sold in substantial quantities by respondents in the recent regular coure of their business; or misrepresenting in any manner their prices or the savings a vailable to their purchasers.

7. Failing to maintain and produce for inspection and copying for a period of three years adequate records to document for the entire period during which each advertisement of swimmng pools or other home improvement products w"", run and for a period of six weeks after the termination of its publication in press or broadcast media; a. the cost of publishing each advertisement including the preparation and dissemination thereof;

b. the volume of sales made of the advertised product or service at the advertised price;

c. the wholesale cost to the respondents of each advertised product or service; and d. the retail price charged each customer of respondents for the advertised product or service.

8. Using the word "Sale " or any - other word or words of similar import or meaning not set forth specifcally herein unless the price of said merchandise being offered for sale constitutes a significant reduction from the actual bona fide price at which such merchandise was sold or offered for sale to the public on a regular basis by respondents for a reasonably substantial period of time in the recent regular course of their business. - 9. (a) Hepresenting, orally or in writing, directly or by implication that by purchasing any of said merchandise at retail, customers are afforded savings amounting to the difference between respondents stated price and respondents' former price, unless such merchandise has been sold or offered for sale in good faith at the former price by respondents for a reasonably substantial period of time in the recent regular course of their business.

(b) Hepresenting, orally or in wrting, directly or by implication, that by purchasing any of said merchandise at retail, customers are afforded savings amounting to the difference between respondents' stated price and a compared price for said merchandise in respondents' trade area unless a substantial number of the principal retail outlets in the trade area regularly sell said merchandise at the compared price or some higher price.

(c) Representing, orally or in writing, directly or by implication, that MARK ENTERPRISES, INC. 1070 1068 Decision and Order by purchasing any of said merchandisc at retail, customers are afforded savings amounting to the difference between respondents' stated price and a compared value price for comparable merchandise, unless substantial sales of merchandise of like grade and quality are being lade in ,the trade area at the compared price or a higher price, and unless respondents have in good faith conducted a market surveyor obtained a similar representative sample of prices in their trade area which establishes the validity of said compared price, and it is clearly and conspicuously disclosed that the comparison is with merchandise of like grade and quality.

10. Representing, directly or by implication, that installation of respondents' swimmng pools or other home improvement products is included in an advertised or represented price, unless such represented price does actually include such installation. 11. Misrepresenting, orally or in wrting, directly or by implication thc cfficiency, durability, quality or limitations of said products services and installations.

12. Representing, directly or by implication, that the home of any of respondents' purchasers or prospective purchasers will be used for any type of advertising or demonstration purose or as a model home or that as a result of such use, respondents' purchasers or prospective purchasers will bc granted reduced prices or wil receive discounts or allowances of any type; unless in every instance, the parties to whom such representations are made are offered merchandise or services at a pnce;

(a) that is signcantly less than the price at which identical merchandise or servces are offered to those to whom such representations have not been made; and (b) which constitutes a signcant reduction from the price cstablished by sales of a reasonably substantial number of identical items of merchandise or servces by the respondents in their recent, regular course of business.

It is furthir ordered That respondents shall forthwith deliver a copy of this order to cease and desist to all present and future personnel of respondents engaged in the offering for sale or sale of respondents products, installations or services at retail or in any aspect of preparation, creation or placing of advertising, and that respondents secure a signed statement acknowledging the receipt of said ordcr from each such person:

It is further ordered That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (80) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such a", dissolution, assignent or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corpordtion, the creation or dissolution of ), 1076 j"EDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint R5 l"T.

subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. It is Tllat the. individual respondent named herein fu:rtkJr ordered promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his present business or employment and of his affilation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondent' s current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which he is engaged as well as a description of his duties and responsibilities.

It is further ordered That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, me with the Commission a report, in wrting, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 85 F.T.C. 1052 · 85 F.T.C. 1076 →