Consumer Law Library

Medema Homes, Inc

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 271

Citation
86 F.T.C. 271
Docket
C-2702
Complaint
1975-07-21
Decision
1975-07-21
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Truth in Lending Act
Industry
housing sales
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Tommie W. Wakefield
Respondent counsel
Pro "e
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

credit lending

Cite this decision

Medema Homes, Inc, 86 F.T.C. 271 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0032

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0032)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF MEDEMA HOMES, INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDF:RAL TRADE COMMISSION AND TRUTH IN LENDING ACTS Docket C 2702. Com,plaint, July 197. Df!cisioll hly, 197.5 Consent aruer re4uiring a Littleton, Colo., mortgage loan broker, among- other things to cease violating the Truth in Lp.oding Act by failing to disclose to consumers in connection with the extension of consumer credit, such informat.ion as required by Regulation Z of the said Act.

Appearances For the Commission: Tommie W. Wakefield. For the respondents: Pro "e.

COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Medema Homes, Inc., a corporation, and C. J. Medema and Richard D. Jones, individually and as officers of said corporation, hereinafter sometimes referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts, aod the implementing regulation promulgated under the Truth in Lending Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Medema Homes, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado, with its principal offce and place of business located at 4901 East Dry Creek Rd., Littleton, Colo. Respondents C. J. Medema and Richard D. Jones are offcers of the corporate respondent. They formulate, direct and control the acts and practices of the corporate respondent including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. Their address is the same as that of the corporate respondent.

PAR. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been engaged in the advertising, offering for sale and sale of housing to the general puhlic.

PAR. 3. In the ordinary course and conduct of their business as 272 n:IJr:RAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint Sf) F T.C. aforesaid, respondents regularly arrange fur the extension of consumer credit or offer to extend or arrange for the extension of such credit, as arrange for the extension of credit" and "consumer credit" are defined in Section 226.2 of Regulation ii, the implementing regulation of the Truth in Lending Act, duly promulgated by tbe Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

PAR. 4. Subsequent to July 1 , 1969, respondents, in the ordinary course of business as aforesaid and in connection with credit sales, have caused, and are causing, to be published, advertisements, as "credit sale" and "advertisement" are defined in Section 22G.2 of Regulation Z which advertisements aid, promote or assist, directly or indirectly, the extension of other than open end credit.

PAR. 5. Respondents, in certain of the above-mentioned advertisements, have stated and are stating the amount of the downpayment (in dollars or as a percentage of the sale price) without also stating, as required by Section 226. 1O(d)(2) of Regulation Z, all the following terms:

(a) the cash price: (the amount of the loan; (b) the amount of the downpayment required or that no downpayment is required, as applicable;

(c) the number, amount and due dates or period of payments scheduled to repay the indebtedness if the credit is extended; and (d) the amount of the finance charge expressed as an annual percentage rate.

PAR. 6. Respondents, in certain of these advertisements, have stated and are stating, the rate of a finance charge, as "finance charge" is defined in Section 226.2 of Regulation Z, and have not expressed said rate as an "annual percentage rate " using the tenn "annual percentage rate," as "annual percentage rate" is defined in Section 226.2 of Regulation Z, in violation of Section 226.1O(d)(l) of Regulation ii. PAR. 7. Respondents, in certain other of these advertisements, have stated and are stating the rate of interest as a simple annual rate in conjunction with the "annual percentage rate," but have printed and are printing the simple annual rate more conspicuously than the annual percentage rate" in violation of Section 226.1O(d)(l)(i) of Regulation ii.

PAR. H. Pursuant to Section 103(q) of the Truth in Lending Act respondents' aforesaid failures to comply with the provisions of Regulation Z constitute violations of that Act and, pursuant to Section 108 thereof, respondents have thereby violated the Federal Trade Commission Act.

271 Decision and Order DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Kansas City Regional Offce proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder, and the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes tbe following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Medema Homes, Inc. is a corporation organized existing and doing business under and by virtue ofthe Jaws of the State of Colorado, with its office and principal place of business located at 4901 E. Dry Creek Rd., city of Litteton, State of Colorado. Respondents C. J. Medema and Richard D. Jones are offcers of said corporation. They formulate, direct and control the policies, acts and practices of said corporation, and their principal offce and place of business is located at the above-stated address. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondents Medema Homes, Inc., a corporation its successors and assigns, its officers, and C. J. Medema and Richard D. Jones, individually and as officers of said corporation, and respondents ), Decision and Order 86 agents, representatives, salesmen and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with any advertisement to aid, promote or assist, directly or indirectly, any arrangement or extension of consumer credit as "consumer credit" and advertisement" are defined in Regulation Z (12 CFR !'226) of the Truth in Lending Act (Pub. L. 90-321, 15 U. C. !'1601 et seq. forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Representing in any such advertisement, directly or by implication, that no downpayment is required, the amount of the downpayment or the amount of any instalment payment, either in dollars or as a percentage, the dollar amount of any finance charge, the number of instalments or the period of repayment, or that there is no charge for credit, unless all of the following items are clearly and conspicuously stated, in terminology prescribed under Section 226.8 of Regulation Z as required by Section 226.1O(d)(2) of Regulation (a) the cash price; (the amount of the loan; (b) the amount of the downpayment required or that no downpayment is required, as applicable;

(c) the number, amount and due dates or period of payments scheduled to repay the indehtedness if the credit is extended; and (d) the amount of the finance charge expressed as an annual percentage rate.

2. Stating in any advertisement the rate of a finance charge unless said rate is expressed as an annual percentage rate, using the term annual percentage rate " as "finance charge" and "annual percentage rate" are defined in Section 226.2 and as required by Section 226.1O(d)(l) of Regulation Z.

3. Stating in any advertisement the simple annual rate of interest in conjunction with the "annual percentage rate" unless the "annual percentage rate" is printed as conspicuously as the simple annual rate as required by Section 226.1O(d)(I)(i) of Regulation Z. 4. Failng, in any advertisement, to make all disclosures as required by Section 226.10 in the manner prescribed by Sections 226. , 226.8 and 226.10 of Regulation Z.

It is further ordered That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in any corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. It is further ordered That the individual respondents named herein promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of their present business or employment and of their affiiation with a new business or CARLILE-AGEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.. ET AL. 27;' 27S Complaint employment. Such notice shan include respondents' current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which they are engaged as wen as a description of their duties and responsibilities.

It is further ordered That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions. It is further ordered That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 86 F.T.C. 266 · 86 F.T.C. 275 →