Consumer Law Library

J & J Furniture Corp

Volume 87 · 87 F.T.C. 383

Citation
87 F.T.C. 383
Docket
C-2800
Complaint
1976-03-08
Decision
1976-03-08
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
furniture and home appliances
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; notice_to_customers; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting
Order term (years)
2
Commission counsel
Sandra L. Bird
Respondent counsel
Wallman Liebman New York City
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

credit lending

Cite this decision

J & J Furniture Corp, 87 F.T.C. 383 (1976). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v087-0049

Report an error in this record (decision id v087-0049)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF J & J FURNITURE CORP., ET AL.

CONSE ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2800. Complaint, Mar. 1976-Decision, Mar. , 1976 Consent order requiring anew Yark City seller and distributor of furniture and home appliances, among- other things where sales presentations have been made in whole or in part in Spanish, to cease failing to furnish buyers with Spanish language translations of contracts, agreements or other documents used in connection with retail credit sales. Further, respondents are required to prominently display in-store notices of customers' right to receive all necessary documents in both Spanish and English.

Appearances For the Commission: Sandra L. Bird. For the respondents: Wallman Liebman New York City. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade , aCommission having reason to believe that J & J Furniture Corp. corporation, and Luis R. Jerez, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, have violated Section 5 of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the puhlic interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent J & J Furniture Corp. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its offce and principal place of business located at 179 East 116th St., New York, New York. Respondent Luis R. Jerez is an officer of said corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including those hereinafter set forth. His business address is the same as that of the corporate respondent. PAR. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution to the public of furniture and home appliances. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business, as aforesaid orrespondents have engaged in and are now engaged in commerce, their practices affect commerce, as Hcommerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended. Respondents purchase for 384 FEDERAL TRADE COM:IISSION DECISIOKS Complaint 87 F.

resale furniture and home appliances from suppliers located in various States of the United States. Respondents cause these products, when purchased by them, to be transported from the place of manufacture or purchase to their business establishment located in New York. In addition, respondents have disseminated and have caused to be disseminated advertisements concerning said products in newspapers and radio broadcasts of interstate circulation. Said advertisements have been disseminated for the purpose of inducing the purchase of respondents' merchandise.

PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business as aforesaid, and for the purpose of inducing consumers who only speak, read, write or understand Spanish, or consumers whose predominant language Spanish to purchase their products, respondents have disseminated and have caused to be disseminated, in commerce, advertisements in the Spanish language and, in a substantial number of instances, have caused their sales personnel to conduct oral sales presentations to such consumers in the Spanish language.

PAR. 5. In the further course and conduct of their business as aforesaid, and for the purpose of facilitating the purchase of their merchandise, respondents regularly extend credit or arrange for credit to be extended to retail purchasers.

In connection with said credit transactions, respondents utilize contracts, documents, notices, forms or other legal instruments which are printed only in the English language.

PAR. 6. In the further course and conduct of their business as aforesaid, respondents fail to provide customers who only speak, read write or understand Spanish, or whose predominant language Spanish, with a complete and accurate translation in Spanish of the documents normally executed and provided to customers in connection with credit sales, or which are required by law to be provided to customers in connection with such sales at the time of the transaction. PAR. 7. Respondents' failure to provide customers who only speak read, write or understand Spanish, or whose predominant language is Spanish, with a full and complete translation in Spanish of all the documents described in Paragraph Six hereof, deprives a substantial number of Spanish-speaking consumers, many of whom have been induced to deal with respondents as a result of respondents' advertisements or sales presentations in Spanish, of the opportunity to receive full and adequate disclosure of the tems and conditions of any agreements they have entered into, of their rights and obligations under such agreements, and of other written infonnation or notices normally provided to consumers at the time of the transaction. Therefore, the acts and practices of respondents, as set forth in J & .J FIJRNlTlJRE CORP , ET AL. 385 383 Decision and Order Paragraphs Five and Six hereof, were and are unfair, misleading and deceptive.

PAR. 8. In the course and conduct of their aforesaid business, and at all times mentioned herein, respondents have been and are now, in substantial competition in commerce, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of furniture, home appliances and other products of the same general kind and nature as those sold by respondents. PAR. 9. The aforesaid acts and practices of the respondents, as herein alleged, were and are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondents' competitors and constituted and now constitute unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the New York Regional Offce proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, and having duly considered the comments fied thereafter pursuant to Section 2.34 of its Rules, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order: 1. Respondent, & J Furniture Corp. is a corporation organized existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State 386 FEDERAL TRADE COM!AISSION DECISIONS Decision and Order 87 F. of New York, with its office and principal place of business located at 179 East 116th St., Kew York, New York.

Respondent Luis R. Jerez is an officer of said corporation. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of said corporation and his business address is the same as that of said corporation.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That respondents J & J Furniture Corp., a corporation its successors and assigns and its officers, and Luis R. Jerez individually and as an officer of said corporation, and respondents agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale, and distribution of furniture, home appliances or of any other products and services in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, do forthwith cease and desist, in connection with credit sales in which the sales presentation has been conducted in whole or in part in Spanish, from:

1. Failng to furnish consumers executing any contracts agree ments or other documents in connection with such sales, a complete and accurate translation in Spanish of each such writing, prior to the execution of the same.

2. Failing to furnish consumers with complete and accurate translations in Spanish of any other documents, notices or disclosures normally provided to consumers in connection with respondents' credit sales at the time of the transaction.

Provided, however That nothing in this order shall be understood to apply to sales receipts or other documents which serve merely as a memorandum of sale and do not, in themselves, contain covenants disclaimers or other provisions defining the rights and responsibilities of the parties.

Further provided That respondents must comply with subparagraphs 1 and 2 of this order by providing consumers either with: a. bilngual documents containing all the provisions and disclosures in both English and Spanish, or b. separate documents containing complete and accurate translations in Spanish of each English language document, and which shall contain in a clear and conspicuous manner in the Spanish language, the following heading in boldface 10 point type: J & J FVHKITVRE CORP., ET AL. 387 383 Decision and Order READ THIS FIRST THIS IS A TRANSLATION OF THE DOCUME T OR DOCUMENTS YOU HAVE RECEIVED OR ARE ABOUT TO SIG It is Jurther ordered That respondents prominently display, in at least two different locations on their premises, one of them being the location where customers usually execute consumer credit instruments or other legally binding documents, the following notice in Spanish: NOTICE TO SPANISH SPI:AKIKG CUSTOMERS IF YOC ARE A SPANISH.SPEAKIKG CUSTOMER AND THE SALES PRES. E:OTATION WAS MAD 1:, IN WHOLE OR IN PART IN SPANISH, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO RECEIVI: A SPANISH TRANSLATION OF THE CREDIT CONTRA"T A:OD OF THE OTHER DOCUMENTS RI:LATED TO THE FINAKC. ING OF YOUR PURCHASE BEFORE YOU SIGN AKYTHING. DO NOT SIGN A:OY DOCUMEKTS UNTIL YO!; HAVE RE"I:IVED AND READ THE SPANISH TRANSLATIOKS.

It is Jurther ordered With respect to each account in which translations in Spanish are provided, as required herein, that respondents shall maintain in their fies, for a period of two years, statements signed by respondents' customers acknowledging receipt of such translations.

It is Jurther ordered That respondents deliver a copy of this order to cease and desist to all operating divisions and to all present and future personnel of respondents engC?ged in making sales presentations and in the consummation of any consumer credit transactions. It is Jurther ordered That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order. It is Jurther ordered That the individual respondent named herein promptly notify the Commission upon the discontinuance of his present business and of his affiiation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondent's current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which he is engaged as well as a description of his duties and responsibilties. It is Jurther ordered That no provision of this order shall be construed in any way to annul, invalidate, repeal, terminate, modify or exempt respondents from complying with agreements, orders or directives of any kind obtained by any other agency, or act as a defense to actions instituted by municipal or State regulatory agencies. :provision of this order shall be construed to imply that any past or 388 FEDERAL TRADE "OMMISSION DECISIONS Decision and Order 87 FTC. future conduct of respondents complies with the rules and regulations , or the statutes administered by the Federal Trade Commission. It is further ordered That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. DARY' S FGRNITURE CORP,. ET AI" 389 389 Complaint

← 87 F.T.C. 379 · 87 F.T.C. 389 →