Consumer Law Library

Soundtrack Chevell Industries, Inc.

Volume 88 · 88 F.T.C. 434

Citation
88 F.T.C. 434
Docket
8998
Decision
1976-09-21
Document type
other
Case type
procedural
Outcome
other
Commission counsel
Richard H. Gateley and John J. Hemrick
Respondent counsel
Thompson, Knight, Simmons & Bullion, Dallas, Tex
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Soundtrack Chevell Industries, Inc., 88 F.T.C. 434 (1976). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v088-0047

Report an error in this record (decision id v088-0047)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In THE MATTER OF SOUNDTRACK CHEVELL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. Docket 8998. Order, Sept. 21, 1976 Determination that subpoena enforcement proceedings should not be commenced with remand to administrative law judge for issuance of a new subpoena. Appearances For the Commission: Richard H. Gateley and John J. Hemrick. For the respondents: Thompson, Knight, Simmons & Bullion, Dallas, Tex.

ORDER REMANDING Matter To ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE The administrative law judge has certified complaint counsel’s motion that the Commission institute proceedings to enforce a subpoena ad testificandum directing Mr. James Cowan to testify. The subpoena directed Mr. Cowan to appear on July 22, 1976, at a hearing in Dallas, Texas. According to the motion, however, complaint counsel “contacted Mr. Cowan and told him not to appear on July 22, 1976, but that he would be called early the following week should the hearings continue.” Complaint counsel assert that they have subsequently been unable to reach the witness.

The Commission has determined that enforcement proceedings should not be commenced unless a new subpoena issues directing Mr. Cowan to appear on a date certain and the witness disobeys the subpoena. Accordingly, It is ordered, That this matter be, and it hereby is remanded to the administrative law judge for issuance of a new subpoena. Commissioner Dole did not participate by reason of absence. FOOD TOWN STORES, INC., ET AL. 435 485 Complaint

← 88 F.T.C. 433 · 88 F.T.C. 435 →