Consumer Law Library

Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.

Volume 130 · 130 F.T.C. 1219

Citation
130 F.T.C. 1219
Docket
9293
Decision
2000-11-28
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
antitrust
Outcome
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 130 F.T.C. 1219 (2000). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v130-0031

Report an error in this record (decision id v130-0031)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC., ET AL.

Docket No. 9293 Order, November 28, 2000 On November 27, 2000, Complaint Counsel and Counsel for Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Carderm Capital L.P., and Andrx Corporation filed a joint motion to withdraw this matter from adjudication for the purpose of allowing the Commission to consider a consent agreement in disposition of this matter. ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION This matter is before the Commission upon the joint motion filed by Complaint Counsel and Counsel for Respondents that this matter be withdrawn from adjudication -- pursuant to Sections 3.25 (b) and (c) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. ยงยง 3.25(b),(c) (2000) -- for the purpose of considering a proposed consent agreement executed by Complaint Counsel and Counsel for Respondents. Counsel represent that in their views the agreement is appropriate to settle the issues in this proceeding and that it conforms to the requirements of Rule 2.32 of the Commission Rules of Practice.

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid motion to withdraw this matter from adjudication be, and it hereby is, granted. By the Commission.

← 130 F.T.C. 1214