North Carolina BD. of Dental Examiners
Volume 150 · 150 F.T.C. 849
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
North Carolina BD. of Dental Examiners, 150 F.T.C. 849 (2010). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v150-0027
Report an error in this record (decision id v150-0027)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. 849 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.
After consideration of the proposed transaction as set forth in the Petition and supplemental documents, as well as other available information, the Commission has determined to approve the divestiture of the Michigan Title Plant Assets to Data Trace. In according its approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and representations made in connection with Fidelity’s Petition, and has assumed them to be accurate and complete.
By direction of the Commission.
THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS Docket No. 9343. Order, November 15, 2010 Order granting Complaint Counsel an extension of time to file a response to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and granting Respondent an extension of time to file a response to Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Partial Summary Decision.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME On November 2, 2010, Complaint Counsel filed a Motion For Partial Summary Decision in this matter, and on November 3, 2010, Respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss. Under the Commission Rules of Practice governing adjudicative proceedings, the responses to these Motions would respectively be due on November 17, 2010, and November 15, 2010.' On November 5, 2010, Complaint Counsel and Respondent filed a Joint Motion For Extension of Time (“Joint Motion”), proposing an alternative schedule pursuant to which their respective See Commission Rule 3.24(a)(2), 16 C.F.R. § 3.24(a)(2)(2010), and Commission Rule 3.22(d), 16 C.F.R. § 3.22(d); see also Commission Rule 4.3, 16 C.F.R. § 4.3.
VOLUME 150 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.
responses would be due on November 30, 2010, and _ their respective replies to those responses would be due on December 10, 2010.
The Commission has determined to grant the Joint Motion. The time periods prescribed by the Commission Rules of Practice ordinarily should afford parties to Commission proceedings sufficient time to effect filings of sufficient quality and detail to aid in the preparation of Commission opinions and orders. In this case, however, the virtually simultaneous filing of two dispositive motions -- a Motion For Partial Summary Decision and a Motion To Dismiss -- means that the parties will consequently need to file virtually simultaneous responses and replies. To ensure that the parties can fully address all relevant issues arising from these two Motions in their respective filings, the Commission has determined to grant the extensions the parties have requested. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT Respondent must file any response to Complaint Counsel’s Motion For Partial Summary Decision -and Complaint Counsel must file any response to Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss -- on or before November 30, 2010; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent and Complaint Counsel must file any replies to the foregoing responses on or before December 10, 2010. By the Commission, Commissioner Brill recused.