Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

The Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Volume 162 · 162 F.T.C. 1203

Citation
162 F.T.C. 1203
Docket
9368
Decision
2016-10-14
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
antitrust
Industry
healthcare
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

merger acquisition

Cite this decision

The Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 162 F.T.C. 1203 (2016). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v162-0027

Report an error in this record (decision id v162-0027)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF THE PENN STATE HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER AND PINNACLEHEALTH SYSTEM Docket No. 9368. Order, October 14, 2016 Order granting a Joint Expedited Motion for a Continuance of Administrative Proceedings to continue all current deadlines in this matter—including the commencement of the administrative hearing—by one week. ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE On September 27, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its Opinion and Judgment directing the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to preliminarily enjoin the merger between Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System, pending the outcome of this administrative proceeding.1 In light of prior Commission orders, the administrative hearing was therefore scheduled to commence on October 18.

Complaint Counsel and Respondents now request that the Commission continue the administrative hearing for one week and grant a corresponding extension of all pre-hearing deadlines.2 Hershey represents that it needs additional time to allow its board of directors to determine whether to continue pursuing the merger following the Third Circuit’s ruling. The parties state that a oneweek continuance will give Respondents sufficient time to finalize their decision and may obviate the expenditure of unnecessary resources in preparation for the hearing in this matter, without imposing any countervailing harms. 1 Fed. Trade Commu v. Penn State Hershey Med. Ctr., --- F.3d ---, 2016 WL 5389289 (3d Cir. Sept. 27, 2016), at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ documents/cases/160927pinnacledecision.pdf. 2 Penn State Hershey Med. Ctr., Docket No. 9368, Joint Expedited Motion for Continuance of the Administrative Hearing (Oct. 11, 2016). VOLUME 162 Interlocutory Orders, Etc, In light of the foregoing, we find that there is good cause to grant the requested continuance. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing shall commence on October 25, 2016, and that all pre-hearing deadlines shall be extended until October 24, 2016. By the Commission.

ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK 1205 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

← 162 F.T.C. 1202 · 162 F.T.C. 1205 →