Consumer Law Library

Fruehauf Trailer Company

Volume 69 · 69 F.T.C. 180

Citation
69 F.T.C. 180
Docket
6608
Complaint
1956-08-17
Decision
1966-02-11
Document type
modifying order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
truck trailer manufacturing
Outcome
modified
Relief
divestiture; cease_and_desist; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting
Order term (years)
10
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

merger acquisition

Cite this decision

Fruehauf Trailer Company, 69 F.T.C. 180 (1966). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v069-0018

Report an error in this record (decision id v069-0018)

Order status: modified (still in effect) Commission order action. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF FRUEHAUF TRAILER COMPANY' MODIFIED ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Feb. , 1966 Docket 6608. Complaint, Aug. 19.56-Decision, Modified divestiture order, in compliance with the final order of the Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, of January 21 , 1966, requiring respondent to divest itself within 1 year of its Strick Trailers Division which was acquired in 1956, Strick must be restored as a going concern and effective competitor in al1 lines of commerce in whkh it was engaged immediately prior to its acquisition by respondent, and forbiding respondent from acquiring any other manufacturer of truck trailers for 10 years without approval of the Commission;

Divestiture order of May 28, 1965, 67 F. C. 878, required respondent to djvest itself of Strick plus the Hobbs Manufacturing Co. of Fort Worth Texas, and Hobbs Trailer and Equipment Co. of Dallas, Texas, which it acquired in 1955.

MODIFIED ORDER Fruehauf Corporation, having filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on August 6, 1965, a petition to review and set aside the order of divestiture issued herein on May 28, 1965 (67 F. C. 878J; and the Commission and Fruehauf Corporation, having subsequently agreed upon a plan of divestiture and upon the provisions of a final order modifying the order entered by the Commission on May 28, 1965; and the Court on Janurary 21 , 1966, having issued its final order affrming and enforcing said order as submitted by the Commission and Fruehauf Corporation;

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered That the order of May 28, 1965, be, and it hereby is, modified in accordance with the final order of the Court to read as follows:

It is ordered That (A) Respondent, the Fruehauf Corporation, a corporation and its offcers, directors, agents, representatives, and employees shall, within one (1) year from the date of this , of al1 assets of order, divest itself absolutely, in good faith its Strick Trailers Division and such other assets as may be necessary to restore the Strick Company and Strick Plastics .Now known as the F)'uehauf Corporation. , FRUEHAUF TRAILER CO. 181 180 Modified Order Corporation as a going concern and effective competitor in all the Unes of commerce in which it was engaged immediately prior to its acquisition by respondent. As used in this order assets" shah include any properties, rights and privileges, tangible and intangible, including but not Umited to all plants, machinery, equipment, contract rights, patents, licenses, trade names, trademarks and good wjJ of whatever description.

(B) Pending divestiture, respondent shall not make any changes in any of the above-mentioned assets which impair their present capacity for the production, distribution, sale or financing of truck-trailers, or impair their market value, unless such capacity or value is restored prior to divestiture. (C) Respondent in such divestiture shah not sell or transfer, directly or indirectly, any of the assets to be divested to anyone who at the time of divestiture owns or controls more than one percent (1 %) of respondent' s stock, or who is an offcer, director, representative, employee or agent of, or under the control, infiuence or direction of respondent, or any of respondent's subsidiary or affliated companies, or to anyone who is not approved in advance by the Federal Trade Commission.

(D) If respondent divests the assets, properties, rights and privileges, described in paragraph A of this order, to a new corporation or corporations, the stock of each of which is whoHy owned by the Fruehauf Corporation, and if respondent then distributes all of the stock in said corporation or corporations to the stockholders of the Fruehauf Corporation, in proportion to their holding of the Fruehauf Corporation stock, then paragraph (C) of this order shall be inapplicable, and the following paragraphs (E) and (F) shall take force and effect in its stead.

(E) No person who is an offcer, director, or executive employee of the Fruehauf Corporation, or who owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than one (1) percent of the stock of the Corporation, shall be an offcer, director or executive employee of any new corporation or corporations described in paragraph (D) or shah own or control, directly or indirectly, more than one (1) percent of the stock of any new corporation or corporations described in paragraph (D). (F) Any person who must sell or dispose of a stock interest in the Fruehauf Corporation or the new corporation or Complaint 69 F.

corporations described in paragraph (D) in order to comply with paragraph (E) of this order may do so within six (6) months after the date on which distribution of the stock of the said corporation or corporations is made to stockholders of Fruehauf Corporation.

It is furthe1' ordered That for a period of ten (10) years after the date of service of this Order upon respondent, respondent shan cease and desist from acquiring, directly or indirectly, through subsidiaries or otherwise, any interest in any concern engaged in the business of manufacturing truck trailers without the prior approval of the Federal Trade Commission. It is further ordend That respondent shan submit to the Commission on the first day of each calendar month a report in writing setting forth its progress in carrying out the divestiture requirement of this order until the divestiture has been completed with the approval of the Commission; and respondent shan submit to the Commission on the first day of each calendar year a report in writing setting forth its compliance with the cease and desist provisions of this order.

← 69 F.T.C. 169 · 69 F.T.C. 182 →