Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

William D. Yarnell

Volume 69 · 69 F.T.C. 1055

Citation
69 F.T.C. 1055
Docket
C-1076
Complaint
1966-06-24
Decision
1966-06-24
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
home improvement products
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting; notice_to_customers
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons

Cite this decision

William D. Yarnell, 69 F.T.C. 1055 (1966). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v069-0081

Report an error in this record (decision id v069-0081)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM D. YARNELL doing business as :'ATIONAL ALUMIKUM COMPANY CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , 11\ REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT June 24, 1.966 Docket C-1076. Complaint, June 24, J.66-Demsion, Consent order requiring a Columbia, S, , dealer in aluminum siding and re. lated home improvement products to cease using fictitious pricing and savings claims, misrepresenting payment of commissions, source of products, business affliation, and maintenance of such products. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that William D. Yarne1l, an individual trading and doing business as National Aluminum Company, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent, William D. Yarne1l, is an individual trading and doing business under the name of National Aluminum Company, with his principal place of business located at 2200 Main Street, in the city of Columbia, State of South Carolina.

PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and for some time last past been, engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale and distribution of aluminum siding and related home improvement products to the public.

PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of his business, respondent Complaint 69 F.

now causes, and for some time last past has caused, his said products, when sold, to be shipped from his place of business in the State of South Carolina to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States and maintains, and at a1l times mentioned herein has maintained, a substantial course of trade in said products in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of his business, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase or respondent' s products, respondent' s salesmen or representatives have represented, and now represent, directly or by implication, in oral solicitations to prospective purchasers that:

(1) Purchasers who allow materials installed by respondent to be used as models and for demonstration purposes wil receive special or reduced prices for respondent' s products and that savings will thereby be granted respondent' s customers in reductions from respondent' s established se1Jing prices. (2) Purchasers wi1 receive a commission from respondent for each sale and insta1Jation of his materials made as a result of displaying or advertising their homes or as a result of referring other purchasers to respondent.

(3) Aluminum siding sold by respondent is manufactured by Reynolds Aluminum Company.

(4) Respondent is connected or affliated with Reynolds Aluminum Company.

(5) Aluminum siding sold by respondent will never need any painting.

PAR. 5. In truth and in fact:

(1) For the reason that respondent does not se1J his products at established sellng prices, the prices represented as special or reduced prices at which respondent se1Js his products to purchasers who agree to have their homes used as models for demonstration purposes are not special or reduced prices and savings are not granted respondent's customers in reductions from any established se1Jing price.

(2) Respondent does not in every instance display or advertise homes in accordance with its promises and representations; nor does it, in those instances in which sales are made as the result of the use of purchasers' homes for advertising or display purposes pay commissions or other compensation to such purchasers. In the few instances where commissions are paid by respondent to purchasers for referring other purchasers to respondent, they are NATIONAL ALUMINUM CO. 1057 1055 Complaint not paid in accordance with respondent's promises and representations.

(3) Aluminum siding sold by respondent is not manufactured by Reynolds Aluminum Company.

(4) Respondent is not connected or affliated with Reynolds Aluminum Company.

(5) Aluminum siding sold by respondent wil require painting. Therefore, the statements and representations set forth in Paragraph Four hereof are false, misleading and deceptive. PAR. 6. In the conduct of his business, at aD times mentioned herein, respondent has been in substantial competition, in commerce, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of aJuminum siding and related home improvement products of the same general kind and nature as that sold by respondent. PAR. 7. The use by respondent of the aforesaid false, misleading and deceptive statements, representations and practices has had and now has, the capacity and tendency to mislead members of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondent's products by reason of said erroneous and mistaken belief. PAR. 8. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, were and are al1 to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondent's competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition in commerce and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. DECISION AI\D ORDER The Commission having heretofore determined to issue its complaint charging the respondent named in the caption hereof with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the respondent having been served with notice of said determination and with a copy of the complaint the Commission intended to issue together with a proposed form of order; and The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by respondent of al1 the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint to issue herein, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as set Order 69 F.

forth in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission s rules; and The Commission, having considered the agreement, hereby accepts same, issues its complaint in the form contemplated by said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent William D. Yarne1l is an individual trading and doing business under the name of National Aluminum Company, with his principal place of business located at 2200 Main Street in the city of Columbia, State of South Carolina. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is orde,' That respondent Wiliam D. Yarnell, an individual trading and doing business as National Aluminum Company, or trading and doing business under any other name or names, and respondent' s representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale, distribution or installation of aluminum siding or other products, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

1. (a) Representing, directly or by implication, that any price for respondent' s products is a special or reduced price unless such price constitutes a significant reduction from an established selling price at which such products have been sold in substantial quantities by respondent in the recent regular course of his business.

(b) Representing, directly or by implication, that purchasers will receive commissions or other compensation, unless respondent provides an opportunity or program whereby purchasers can qualify for such commissions or other compensation, and provides such commissions or other compensation, in every instance, to those quaJjfying therefor; misrepresenting, directly or by implication, that a home wil be used for display or advertising purposes; or misrepresenting in any manner commissions or any other compensation to be received by respondent's purchasers.

NATIONAL ALUMINUM CO. 1059 1055 Order (c) Representing, directly or by implication, that aluminum siding sold by respondent is manufactured by Reynolds Aluminum Company; or misrepresenting, in any manner, the identity of the manufacturer or the source of any of respondent' s products.

(d) Representing, directly or by implication, that respondent is connected or affliated with Reynolds Aluminum Company; or misrepresenting, in any manner, respondent' busin connections or affliations.

(e) Representing, directly or by implication, that aluminum siding sold by respondent wiJ never need painting; or misrepresenting, in any manner, the painting or other maintenance required for respondent's products. 2. Misrepresenting, in any manner, the savings available to purchasers of respondent's products.

3. Supplying or placing in the hand of any distributor dealer or salesman, brochures, sales manuals, charts, pamphlets or any other advertising material which are displayed or may be displayed, to the purchasing public which contain any of the false or misleading representations prohibited in Paragraphs 1 and 2 herein.

It is further ordered That respondent deliver a copy of this order to every salesman or representative, now or at any time hereafter, engaged in seJJing or soliciting the sale of respondent' products.

It is further ordered That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order. Complaint 69 F. T.

← 69 F.T.C. 1055 · 69 F.T.C. 1060 →