Consumer Law Library

Rheuark Brokerage, Inc.

Volume 72 · 72 F.T.C. 605

Citation
72 F.T.C. 605
Docket
C-1253
Complaint
1967-09-25
Decision
1967-09-25
Document type
consent order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
Clayton Act s2 / Robinson-Patman
Industry
food brokerage
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Rheuark Brokerage, Inc., 72 F.T.C. 605 (1967). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v072-0009

Report an error in this record (decision id v072-0009)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF RHEUARK BROKERAGE , INC., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECTIO:' 2 (c) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket C-1258. Complflint, Sept. 1.967-Decision, Sept. , 1967 Consent order requiring a Kansas City, ::0., food broker to cease accepting ilegal brokerag-e in connection with the sale of food products. Complaint 72 F. T.

COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the parties respondent named in the caption hereof, and hereinafter more particularly described, have been and are now violating the provisions of subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended (U. , Title 15, Section 13), hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges with respect thereto as foJ1ows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Rheuark Brokerage, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, with its offce and principal place of business located at 400 Atlantic Street, Kansas City, Missouri.

Respondent Jack Rheuark is an individual who is president of Rheuark Brokerage, Inc. His principal offce and place of business is the same as that of the corporate respondent. PAR. 2. The parties respondent are now and for the past several years have been, engaged in business primarily as brokers acting as intermediaries in the sale of food commodities and other products from suppliers to buyers operating hamburger stands in various States other than the State of Missouri. As such, the parties respondent have received commissions, brokerage or other compensations in connection with sales made to the owned and franchised hamburger stands of Griff' s of America, Inc., located in Missouri and various other States, through Rigley Distributing Co. a division of Griff' , and Bricc Wholesalers, Inc. In 1965 respondent Rheuark agreed with Robert L. Fel1ers, then president of Griff's of America, Inc., to act as a broker in connection with purchases of various products and supplies for use by the hamburger stands owned and franchised by Griff' s of America, Inc. As part of the agreement respondent Rheuark agreed to pay over to Robert L. Fel1ers or to a corporation controlled by Fel1ers, Rigley Distributing Co., Inc., approximately 90 % of all commissions, brokerage or other compensations received by respondents in connection with certain purchases particularly of potatoes and paper products. PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business for the past several years, the parties respondent named herein, directly or indirectly, have caused food commodities and other product when purchased, to be transported from the State of origin to destinations in other States. Thus, there has been at al1 times mentioned herein a continuous course of trade and commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the aforesaid Clayton Act, in said RHEUARK BROKERAGE, INC., ET AL. 607 605 Decision and Order food commodities and other products across State lines between the purchasers and the sellers of said products. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of respondents' business for the past several years the parties respondent have been collecting and receiving commissions, brokerage or other compensations paid by suppliers on sales to Griff's owned and franchised stands through Rigley Distributing Co. a division of Griff' s and Brice Wholesalers, Inc., when in fact, the parties respondent have been acting for or on behalf of a party to the transaction other than the suppliers by whom such commissions, brokerage or other compensations were so granted or paid.

During the time specified the parties respondent, pursuant to their agreement with Robert L. Fellers, then president of Griff' of America, Inc., have passed back to Fellers directly or indirectly through Fellers' corporation, Rigley Distributing Co. Inc. , approximately 90 % of all commissions, brokerage or other compensations, received from suppliers on their sales to Griff' s owned or franchised stands through Brice Wholesalers, Inc., and/or Griff' s purchasing division, Rigley Distributing Co. PAR. 5. The acts and practices of the parties respondent, as above-alleged and described, are in violation of subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended (D. , Title 15 , Section 13).

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnishcd thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Restraint of Trade proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of subscction (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having, pursuant to the Commission s 1963 Rules of Practice, executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statemcnt that the signing of said agrecment is for settemcnt purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission s rules; and The Commission, having reason 1.0 believe that thc respondents Decision and Order 72 F. have violated said Act, and having determined that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, hereby issues its complaint, has accepted said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order: 1. Respondent Rheuark Brokerage, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, with its offce and principal place of business located at 400 Atlantic Street, Kansas City, Missouri. Respondent Jack Rheuark is an individual who is president of said corporation and his address is the same as that of said corporation.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents. ORDER It is ordered That respondents Rheuark Brokerage, Inc. , a corporation, and its officers, and ,Jack Rheuark, individually and as President of Rheuark Brokerage, Inc. , and their agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the purchase of food commodities and other products, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the amended Clayton Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: Receiving or accepting, directly or indirectly, from any seller, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof upon or in connection with any purchase of food commodities or any other commodity for respondents' own account or where respondents are the agents, representatives or other intermediaries acting for, or in behalf of, or are subject to the direct or indirect control of, any buyer or any buyer offcer, agent, representative or employee. It is further ordered That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. UNITED SALES, INC. , ET AL. 609 609 Complaint

← 72 F.T.C. 596 · 72 F.T.C. 609 →