United Sales, Inc.
Volume 72 · 72 F.T.C. 609
Cite this decision
United Sales, Inc., 72 F.T.C. 609 (1967). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v072-0010
Report an error in this record (decision id v072-0010)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF UNITED SALES, INC., ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECTION 2 (C) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket C-1254. Complaint, Sept. 25, 1967 Decision Sept. , 1967 Consent order requiring a Kansas City, Mo., food broker to cease accepting ilegal brokerage in connection with the sale of food products. COMPLAI"T The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the parties respondent named in the caption hereof, and hereinafter more particularly described, have been and are now violating the provisions of subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended (U. , Title 15, Section 13), hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges with respect thereto as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent L'united Sales, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Kansas. Its offce and principal place of business was located at 4235 Janesvile Street, Wichita, Kansas, unti January 3, 1967. The principal place of business is now located at 315 South Gladstone, Kansas City, Missouri. Respondent Ray :VIickle is an individual who is president of United Sales, Inc. His principal offce and place of business is the same as that of the corporate respondent. This respondent has operated United Sales, Inc., since its incorporation in 1963, when he and one Robert L. Fel1ers, then President of Griff' s of America, Inc., jointly formed Lnited Sales, Inc., each owning 50% of the stock. Respondent Mickle has since acquired al1 of the outstanding capital stock of the corporate respondent. PAR. 2. The parties respondent are now and for the past several years have been engaged in business primarily as brokers acting as intermediaries in the sale of food commodities and other products from suppliers to buyers operating hamburger stands in various States other than the State of Kansas. As such, the parties respondent have received commissions, brokerage or other compensations in connection with sales made to Griff' s of America, Inc., franchised and company-owned hamburger stands through Rig-ley Distributing Co. a division of Griff' s and Brice Wholesalers, Inc.
PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business for the past several years, the parties respondent named herein, directly or indirectly, have caused food commodities and other products, Decision and Order 72 F.
when purchased, to be transported from the State of origin to destinations in other States. Thus, there has been at aJl times mentioned herein a continuous course of trade and commerce, as commerce" is defined in the aforesaid Clayton Act, as amended, in said food commodities and other products across State Jines between the purchasers and the sellers of said products. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of respondents ' business for the past several years, the parties respondent have been collecting and receiving commissions, brokerage or other compensations paid by suppliers on sales of such products to Griff' s of America, Inc., franchised and company-owned hamburger stands through Rigley Distributing Co. and Brice Wholesalers, Inc., when in fact, the parties respondent have been acting for or on behalf of a party to the transaction other than the suppliers by whom such commissions, brokerage or other compensations were granted or paid.
It is further alleged, that the parties respondent, for several years last past, have passed on approximately 90 % of such commissions, brokerage or other compensations, to Griff' s of America Inc., and directly to Robert L. FeJlers, or indirectly to FeJlers through Rigley Distributing Co. Inc. , the purchasers of such products on which such commissions, brokerage or other compensations were paid by suppliers.
PAR. 5. The acts and practices of the parties respondent, as above alleged and described, are in violation of subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended (U. , Title 15 , Section 13).
DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Restraint of Trade proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having, pursuant to the Commission s 1963 Rules of Practice, executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of aJl the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission UNITED SALES, IKC., ET AL. 611 609 Decision and Order by the respondents that the law has been violated as aJ1eged in such complaint, and waivers and provisions as required by the Commission s rules; and The Commission, having reason to believe that the respondents have violated subsection (c) of Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended, and having determined that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, hereby issues its complaint has accepted said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the foJ1owing order: 1. Respondent United Sales, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Kansas. Its offce and principal place of business was located at 4235 JanesviJe Street, Wichita, Kansas until January 3 1967. Its principal place of business is now located at 315 S. Gladstone, Kansas City, Missouri.
Respondent Ray :Wickie is an individual who is president of United Sales, Inc. , and his address is thc same as that of said corporation.
2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents. ORDER It is ordered That respondents United Sales, Inc., a corporation and its offccrs and Ray Mickle, individually and as President of United Sales, Inc., and their agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the purchase of food commodities and other products, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the amended Clayton Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:
Receiving or accepting, directly or indirectly from any seHer, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof upon or in connection with any purchase of food commodities or any other commodity for respondents' own account or where respondents are the agents, representatives or other intermediaries acting for, or in behalf of, or are subject to, the direct or indirect control of, any buyer or any buyer s offcer agent, representative or employee.
It is further ordered That the respondents herein shah, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. Complaint 72 F.