Consumer Law Library

Soft Sheen Company, Inc

Volume 90 · 90 F.T.C. 270

Citation
90 F.T.C. 270
Docket
C-2786
Complaint
1976-01-27
Decision
1977-09-30
Document type
modifying order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
hair care products
Outcome
modified
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure
Commission counsel
Sharon S. Armstrong
Respondent counsel
John 0. Nelson, Molinair, Allegretti, Newitt & Witcoff and Rickey J. Ament Chicago, Ill
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingproduct labelinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Soft Sheen Company, Inc, 90 F.T.C. 270 (1977). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v090-0028

Report an error in this record (decision id v090-0028)

Order status: modified (still in effect) Commission order action. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 3 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE Matrer OF SOFT SHEEN COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

MODIFYING ORDER, IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECS. 5 AND 12 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2786. Complaint, JaTL 27, 1976' Modifying order, Sept. 30. 1977 This order modifies a cease and desist order issued January 27 1976 41 FR 7939 C. 164 to conform with obligations of a consent order issued against a competitiv firm, by limiting substantiation requirements for safety claims in Provision LB.. and revising the third warning, pertaining to hair relaxers, in Provision III.

Appearances For the Commission: Sharon S. Armstrong. For the respondents: John 0. Nelson, Molinair, Allegretti, Newitt & Witcoff and Rickey J. Ament Chicago, Ill. ORDER MODIFYING ORDER To CEASE AND DESIST On October 28, 1976, respondent Soft Sheen Co., Inc. petitioned the Commission to reopen this proceeding to modify the third warning in Provision III of the consent order issued January 28, 1976 against respondents in this matter. The third warning, which is to be made in connection with the sale and distribution of respondents' hair relaxer and which is to appear on the packaging, package inserts and the labels of the product, reads Do not use on bleached, dyed or tinted hair. If you have previously relaxed your hair, relax only the new growth, as described in the directions." Respondent objects to the inclusion of tinted hair in the warning. On March 18, 1976, Soft Sheen requested by letter that the order product coverage be limited to hair relaxers. Our request is incorporated into the October 28, 1976, petition to reopen. Complaint counsel support the petition and recommend that the warning be modified to read:

3. Do not use on bleached hair. Do not use on permanently colored hair which is breaking, splitting or otherwise damaged. For hair that has been permanently colored and shows no sign of damage, use only mild strength formula. 4. If you have previously relaxed your hair, relax only the new growth, as described in the directions.

We agree that the petition should be granted. Most ifnot all, of the products manufactured and sold by Soft Sheen are hair care products, and a substantial portion of the firm s revenues is derived SOFT SHEEN COMPANY, INC., ET AL. 271 270 Modifying Order from the sale of hair relaxers. These latter products are generally sold directly to professional beauticians. Under these circumstances, the Commission believes that modification of the order to limit the substantiation requirements for safety claims to hair care products. and for effcacy claims to hair straighteners, wil serve adequately to protect the public interest. Furthermore, additional expert information provided to the Commission after issuance of the Soft Sheen order, supports revision of the warning requirement. Finally, after entry of its order in this matter, the Commission issued a consent order (89 F. C. 1) against Revlon, Inc., a competitor of Soft Sheen in the sale of hair relaxers, which includes a warning and product coverage identical to the changes recommended by complaint counsel here. For these reasons, the Commission believes that it is in the public interest to grant the modification sought by Soft Sheen.

Accordingly, It is ordered, That the proceeding be, and it hereby is, reopened. It is further ordered, That the order to cease and desist be, and it hereby is, modified by substituting the following for the WARNING contained in Provision III of the order:

WARNING:

1. This product contains potassium hydroxide (lye). You must follow directions carefully to avoid skin and scalp burns, hair loss, and eye injury. Do not use if scalp is irritated or injured. 3. Do not use on bleached hair. Do not use on permanently colored hair which is breaking, splitting, or otherwise damaged. For hair that has been permanently colored and shows no sign of damage, use only mild strength formula. 4. If you have previously relaxed your hair, relax only the new growth, as described in the directions.

5. If the relaxer causes skin or scalp irritation, rinse out immediately and neutralize with the shampoo in the kit. If irritation persists or if hair loss occurs, consult a physician.

If the relaxer gets into eyes, rinse immediately and consult a physician. It is further ordered, That the order to cease and desist be, and it hereby is, modified by substituting the following Provision for I.B. of the order, and relettering the remaining paragraphs accordingly: B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, the effcacy of any hair straightening product or the ingredients therein unless, at the time such representation ib made, respondents have in Modifying Order 90 F.

their possession a reasonable bai:is, consisting of competent and reliable controlled tests, to support such representation; or misrepresenting in any manner the nature of any such product or its ingredients or the effect of any such product or its ingredients on hair or C.skinRepresenting,or any other structurein any manner,of the body.directly or by implication, the safety of any hair care product or the ingredients therein, unless at the time such representation is made, respondents have in their possession a reasonable basis, consisting of competent and reliable controlled tests, to support such representation. 273 Interlocutory Order

← 90 F.T.C. 257 · 90 F.T.C. 273 →